Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Moonrise (novel): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Update AH post GAR delist
FA possibility?: Prescient
Line 50: Line 50:


This is a ''long'' way from FA, and probably barely GA standard. --[[User:Jbmurray|jbmurray]] ([[User talk:Jbmurray|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jbmurray|contribs]]) 01:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
This is a ''long'' way from FA, and probably barely GA standard. --[[User:Jbmurray|jbmurray]] ([[User talk:Jbmurray|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jbmurray|contribs]]) 01:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
: A prescient warning. The article has now been delisted. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 21:23, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:23, 19 April 2009

Former good articleMoonrise (novel) was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 19, 2007Articles for deletionKept
January 11, 2008Articles for deletionKept
April 5, 2008Good article nomineeListed
April 19, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Other

I think the section 'Other' should be named something different. Perhaps 'Major events' would work. I will change it tomorrow if no one objects to this. Shrewpelt (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Passed

This article has passed the GA noms. It is well balanced and well-cited to show factual accuracy. The next steps would be to expand the reception, and development sections. If you feel that this review was in error feel free to take this article to WP:GA/R. Thanks. Tarret talk 21:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FA possibility?

Does anyone want to try to see if this article can be made an FA candidate? We could request a peer review and see if there's anything that is clearly missing, and then, when that's done, give it a try as an FAC. Personally, I think the more novel FAs there are, the better for everyone, and this is already at GA class. John Carter (talk) 19:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put in a peer review request after I check with the main contributors. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 02:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Probably all that needs to be done is the expansion of some of the sections and copyediting. After that, it could reach FA. Shrewpelt (talk) 13:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a long way from FA, and probably barely GA standard. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 01:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A prescient warning. The article has now been delisted. Geometry guy 21:23, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]