Higher education B‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Pittsburgh B‑class Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Qatar B‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Qatar, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Qatar-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.QatarWikipedia:WikiProject QatarTemplate:WikiProject QatarQatar B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The way this is written currently makes it sound like $30,000 is all student orgs get in funding. Since it is more like $700,000 from the JFC this might want to be changed.

Student groups receives almost one million dollars from JFC funding, a bit more than $700,000. --BenjaminTsai ^Talk 07:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Top in the fields" tends to encompass the top-10 schools. If we go by US News, http://www.cmu.edu/clips/rankings.html rankings, then public policy is among the best in the fields. Removing mention of the public policy school is vandalism.

Graduate Public Affairs -

1. 8 overall

Criminal Justice Policy Mgmt - #1 Information and Tech Mgmt - #1

Health Policy and Mgmt - #7 Environmental Policy and Mgmt - #7 Public Policy Analysis - #4

There have been multiple times that the Public Policy has been deleted from the sentence "The public policy, computer science, computer engineering, and drama programs are considered to be among the best in their fields." Raskolnikov4138 has kept putting it back in. While one might not like it, its repeated removal is not vandalism, it is a difference of opinion. I think we need to come to concensus about what it means to be "among the best in a field". USNews ranks Public Policy departments between first and eighth in their subcategories. I would argue that "among the top in the field" should be defined as top 3 or top 5.

Even if we agree that it should be included, Public Policy should not be first in the list. It is less notable than Computer Science, for example. --Matt 02:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. Public policy is NOT more notabale than Carnegie Mellon's other stregths. But if we want to be consistant, graduate engineering is ranked "only" number 8, while computer engineering is ranked #3. How about something like:

The computer science, computer engineering, drama, and PUBLIC POLICY ANALYSIS programs are considered to be among the best in their fields.

Minus the caps, of course.

Rodion Raskolnikov

Our school CMU is mostly famous for CS, ECE and Drama. When one mentions Carnegie Mellon, Computer Science, computers and technology generally comes to mind. Let us not joke ourselves about the eminence of say the public policy program which is far outstripped by other more notable schools such as Georgetown and some of the Ivy Leagues. But, we CMU, definitely, without doubt, are number #1 when it comes to computers (still ranked number #1 and the only program in the school that is #1)! Hence we should not clutter what we are really known for with less notable academic programs. This Wikipedia entry on CMU has consistently mentioned our CS and ECE programs as top, only Rodion Raskolnikov came by recently with his Public Policy adddition. -This previously unsigned post was added on 03:09 UTC, 13 April 2006 by User:128.2.246.196

Firstly, plz sign your comments with four tildes after it. Secondly, the article is not to tell people what they already know/ is most widely known, but rather, in encyclopedic tradition, to state what is. Come to a consensus on what cut off you would like to use, or perhaps even divide into a section for each department. Please dont try to start a flame war though. Qleem 03:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Top three should be it. Let's not add IS because it a fairly undistinguished field - a Business Admin version of Computer Science, if you could say; not as intellectually rigorous as the real thing.--—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.66.236.205 (talk • contribs) 04:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Note: logic is listed as #5 in the nation but this is not on the list. That is surely an academically rigorous field. So, by the preceeding arguement, it should be added.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.2.47.18 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

One more comment: there is no reference on the "prestige" of the drama program. How is it justified to keep this program listed while removing the others?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.2.47.18 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

I changed the rankings paragraph to reflect general departments known for their excellence, rather than naming individual fields. All of the categories are strengths that were listed before, but my rationale for renaming the categories is that each corresponds to a division within the university; i.e. arts, business, CS, engineering, and public policy all have specific schools or colleges dedicated to them. LuoYanshan 20:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the following sentence from the article introduction. It is an unsubstantiated claim, and I have been unable to repudiate it from my research. I am highly suspicious of this claim, since it frankly sounds like gossip. Please readd this information only with reputable references noted. -- Creidieki 21:35, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• It is reported that the university has, on multiple occasions, turned down offers to join the Ivy League.

It is unsubstantiated gossip. Rutgers turned down an invitation. Rutgers, Army, and Navy were once rivals with the Ivy League schools before the conference was formalized. Also, CMU is a Division III school; it would have to file an application to jump to Division I, go through a probationary period and evaluations with the NCAA before it can join the Ivy League.

Rutgers never got an invitation either, obviously. It's a public mega-university that is not remotely academically compatible with the Ivy League. Omnibus 05:27, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rutgers wasn't always a large state school. It was founded as the sister school of Columbia (Queen's and King's colleges, respectively) and remained a small private school up until the 1940s. Still has athletic rivalries with Princeton and Columbia in soccer, field hockey and some other sports. But financially, it was always in the shadow of the Ivies.

Is she for real? On September 22, 2005, a History and Policy student named Stephanie appeared on the "Jaywalking All-Stars" segment of The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. She's scheduled to appear again on September 23, 2005.

Note: She, of course, was just acting. It was TV.

Also on TV, Carnegie Mellon junior ECE major Kermin Elliott Fleming won the 2004 Jeopardy College Championship.

• Kermin's final wager was 1337. And he's from Kentucky. And he lives in Webster Hall. I only write this because I feel important, since my friend is his roommate.

Various authors, activists, scholars, politicians, business leaders, and other notable people have given speeches at Carnegie Mellon over the years. Among them:

• Jeffrey Katzenberg, CEO of DreamWorks Animation SKG - October 6, 2005
• Michael Moore - October 26, 2004
• Dr. Condoleezza Rice - October 21, 2004
• Sen. John Kerry, 2004 presidential campaign - October 20, 2004
• Fmr. Sen. John Edwards, 2004 vice presidential campaign - September 28, 2004
• Bill Gates - February 25, 2004
• Kevin Mitnick - March 18, 2003
• Dr. Howard Zinn - September 23, 2002
• Tom Ridge, Commencement Speech - May 19, 2002
• Robert C. Merton, Nobel Prize recipient - September 6, 2001
• Al Gore, 2000 presidential campaign - October 27, 2000
• Jerry Springer, spoke about politics - October 26, 2000
• Ralph Nader, 2000 presidential campaign - September 26, 2000
• Jane Goodall - April 4, 2000

"The campus was the first educational institution in the world to be completely covered by a wireless network."

Probably true, but not proven. Buena Vista University and Drexel University claim to be the first completely wireless campuses. Carnegie Mellon does not make this claim. Buena Vista, Drexel, and CMU completed campus-wide coverage by the fall of 2000. However, Drexel did not make their dormitories accessible before making their claim. So CMU most likely was ahead of Drexel despite Drexel's (arguably misleading) claim. CMU's Wireless Andrew covered its campus by the time it completed a major upgrade in August 2000. Initial research and experimentation by CMU began in 1994, even before WiFi standards were developed.

Some elementary schools, high schools, private schools, etc. had complete wireless networks before Carnegie Mellon did. (Look at the wording of the original statement. It should mention "post-secondary.")

Do we really want to put the Pittsburgh Universities template at the bottom of the the Carnegie Mellon page? It's an eyesore, contributes no information for people interested in reading about Carnegie Mellon, and does not appear on any other non-Pittsburgh major university pages I've visisted. --BenjaminTsai 20:34, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks fairly ridiculous. Omnibus 05:23, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I developed the Pittsburgh Universities box . . . if you wish to submit proposals for its streamlining I'm all for it, possibly just majors to majors, smallers to smallers, but I feel that the Pittsburgh box is much more neccessary then the "conference" box . . . Tartans deal more with the city of Pittsburgh and Pitt, Duquesne, and Carlow students then they do with "conference" schools. The Pittsburgh box should be visible, if not I see no need for a conference box, Carnegie Mellon is not a "sports" school on the national scene it adds nothing to people trying to read about Carnegie Mellon. Knowing that Pittsburgh has a wealth of university students and the cooperative nature between Pitt and CMU is much more relevant then a sports conference. Ideas about how to better streamline the box are welcomed but the box is much much more relevant then linking to a school that competes in lacrosse with the Tartans. Hholt01 06:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that the template is huge, and the yellow is really glaring. Plus, Carnegie Mellon is a national university - it relates more to MIT more than Duff's Business Institute. I argue that the Carnegie Mellon article is more a destination article than one would surf through looking at Pittsburgh colleges. If we want to say Carnegie Mellon works with Pitt and Duquesne, that should be a feature in the article, instead of adding a huge Pittsburgh Universities box at the bottom --Matt 20:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I recently readded it (without checking if such a discussion existed), because I found such information useful. I found it in University of Pittsburgh, when I was looking at other schools in Pittsburgh, and I would not have had to look at all (through Pittsburgh etc.) it had been here originally. But yes, the colour could be changed. -- Rmrfstar 20:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check out template:Colleges and universities in metropolitan Boston. I think it does a good job with putting 25 Universities in a small box while being smaller and more in line with the color themes of Wikipedia. I'd be alright with a box like that for major & minor schools in Pittsburgh. --Matt 06:52, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Querying "Association of Independent Technological Universities" site:cmu.edu on Google gives no results - it seems like such a minor thing that it doesn't seem important in Carnegie Mellon's article. I move to remove it remove it - what do others think? (Actually, searching around more for this, I get almost no information on this organization. I don't think it's worth including.) --Matt 06:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The official Carnegie Mellon identity page says "From the informal mascot, the Scottie dog". I would say this should be the source - though in other places, The Tartan is listed - but nothing in such an official or vetted place. I say we leave it as Scottie Dog --Matt 04:36, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disgree on this one, I wish I had a better link but Carnegie Mellon's Qatar admissions materials refers to the mascot as the Tartan. Given how often I've heard that during my years, I'm going to go with it. Bugg42 00:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From The Word (Student Affairs' guide book to student life) "The squad also includes the Scottie Dog, Carnegie Mellon’s mascot." --Matt 01:37, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Tartan "Snapshots from the slopes. The ski season turned out to be challenging and unpredictable, highlighted by an appearance of the Tartans’ mascot, the Scottie Dog." (Page 11)

The Carnegie Pulse " Carnegie Mellon's mascot, the Scottie Dog, put in his two cents by grabbing a pen and paper: "

There's a difference between the team name and the mascot sometimes - and this is one of those times. --Matt 15:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a picture of Scottie Dog at the 2005 Homecoming football game (pic). (Source: this blog entry.) - Slo-mo 07:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

As of right now, there is no official mascot [1], although people are definitely hard at work trying to establish one. [2] *shrug* So I added a tag of "unofficial" to the Scottie Dog entry. -Fuzzy 19:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saw that the other day, meant to update the article. Thanks for doing this --Matt 23:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new west coast campus in Mountain View, CA. Is anyone planning on adding a section for this? I think at least a link should be added to their website: link

There's a mention of the Silicon Valley campus with a link to Carnegie Mellon University (West) in the article - maybe a section would be appropriate, but it is mentioned, and a stub exists. I think both should be expanded. --Matt 06:29, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed a list of subtrivial trivia such as "In a 1999 episode (Lovers' Walk, Season 3, Episode 8) of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Joyce (Buffy's mother) says to Buffy, Carnegie Mellon has a wonderful design curriculum." and "In The West Wing episode "Eppur Si Muove" (Season Five), Ellie Bartlet's diplomas can be found on a wall; the bottom one is a B.S. from Carnegie Mellon." in an article about a university. To me that seems like the sort of outrageous stuff someone would make up to parody Wikipedia. Such inclusions in serious articles are completely and totally inappropriate, and they reduces the credibility of the project overall. Build a Carnegie Mellon University in popular culture if you must, but don't put material like that in the article. --Gmaxwell 18:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't really care enough to revert any more, but I'd like to state for the record that I disagree with you. I ask that you consider the possibility that the Wikipedia community might not agree with you in all cases on what Wikipedia is or is not, especially given that the section you object to has been in the article for a year and a half, and you're the only person (as far as I've seen) who has seen fit to try to remove it in that time (and were immediately reverted by two diffferent people, one being me). I can cite several other examples of articles (two on prominent universities and one other) with "in fiction" sections, but frankly I'm hesitant to give you the opportunity to go remove those. User:Glenn Willen (Talk) 16:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have reinserted the references in popular culture. They reflect the outside world's portrayal of Carnegie Mellon and its reputation, thus inclusion is justified. A few items have been deleted. I deleted the manga reference because many can argue that manga is not "popular" (as in "popular culture"). I deleted the Chasing Amy reference because it was not included in the final cut of the film. Hopefully others will view this as a fair compromise. Any further deletions of this section may result in a request for administrative review. I assert that the section is verifiable and worthy of inclusion. - Slo-mo 23:20, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Moved to its own article. Case closed. --Matt 23:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • "University X in fiction/literature or popular culture" sections are found in several university-related articles on the Wikipedia, e.g. the Harvard, Cambridge, Yale, Princeton, Berkeley, and Oxford articles. Since the wiki-community seems to think such a section does not belong in the CMU page, I wonder if the same should apply also to other university-related pages.

It might be a good idea to bring that topic up on those pages. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 01:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the trivia people are driving at the root issue: the article is too big, and every organization with someone who knows how to edit wikipedia has an entry on the main page. I spent a very involved 4 years at Carnegie Mellon and I haven't heard of the debate team or Awareness of Roots in Chinese Culture club.

I believe that the article should be cleaned up. Organizations should go in their own article. I don't think misc.market needs that much detail. Movies filmed at Carnegie Mellon should be in its own category or its own article.

I'll try and clean it up this weekend if I can, but the article is in serious need of help. --Matt 18:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty sure the student organizations should be either heavily gutted, or split into its own article. I'm not convinced that the debate team, society of hispanic engineers, or CMU Originals are "notable" student organizations.

I also don't think that cmu.misc.market is appropriately labeled as a 'tradition' up there with Buggy, Booth, etc.

Thoughts? --Matt 16:24, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. The student organizations overwhelms the article and detracts from the overall quality. I gave it its own page with a prominent link.

The article in general has been gutted since I viewed it about six months ago. While the student orgs page creation is a good move, there's a lot that was useful that was here that is now gone. I haven't been around to watch, so I don't know what happened, but I think that a lot of things should be restored. We used to have an article that didn't require cleanup, and now we have one that does. Greyscale 13:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I, Raskolnikov have just finished cleaning up the article. It still obviously needs hours and hours of work to improve. But I think I improved the article and its organization. I hope my fellow Wikipedians---and CMUers---support it.

So far, so good --Matt 00:24, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My bro goes to Carnegie Mellon. He says the history of the university involves that in the early years, every student was required to work regular shifts in the power plant shoveling coal. Also, the buildings were built on slopes such that in case the university failed, the buildings could be be converted into a gravity assisted assembly line production factory.

Can anyone verify this?

They say the thing about gravity assist on the student tour. I don't know about verification for the article though --Matt 02:48, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also heard the gravity assist thing on the tour, although only about one building with a huge slanting hallway. also heard about the powerplant on the tour. Qleem 02:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have heard it asserted that the gravity assist bit is bullshit. (They do say it on the tour, though.) Don't know about the coal shoveling. User:Glenn Willen (Talk) 18:38, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KGB asserts that the gravity assist bit is BS, yes. (AFAIK, mainly because real assembly lines don't use sloping hallways. Which makes sense to me; what would you be doing, rolling things down them? What if you needed to stop the assembly line in an emergency?)  I, too, have heard that engineering students had to shovel coal for the power plant, and I think it may be true; but I don't know how it could be verified, short of finding a Carnegie Tech grad and asking him. --Quuxplusone 05:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually only the main hallway slopes, each room off to the side is flat. Presumably the piece would be rolled down from room to room. Qleem 18:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The gravity thing has to be bull, considering that the first building built with sloping hallways was Doherty Hall (1908). Porter Hall (1906) could easily have been built with the same sloping hallways, especially given its terrain. Brad

The gravity assisted assembly line can't be true. If so, why is ground leveled before factories are built on it? I'm pretty sure the real reason Baker and Doherty have sloping hallways is because they're built on sloped ground. It seems like Occam's Razor applies here. --Decrypt3 00:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is an urban legend, about as silly as rubbing Hamerschlag's nose. Greyscale 05:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archived CMU Name Talk Topics

Hopefully, I can put some of the misunderstandings about "CMU" to rest. I was a student there in 1988, when the logo first became an issue and followed the events throughout. I've done a bit of research to corroborate my old and failing memory.

First, the research. Currently, there is no registrant for the typed text "CMU" or even a stylized logo of only those letters. You can verify this by accessing the Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) and searching for "CMU"). While there have been applications for graphic logos incorporating the letters CMU (including the currently "live" one), take a look at serial number 73699355. Carnegie Mellon filed for registration on 12/7/97 and opposition was published on 9/13/88 (presumably by Central Michigan, but it doesn't say). The application was abandoned on 5/2/1989. Note that the applications both before and after this were also published for opposition -- who knows who actually opposed them.

Suffice it to say that if anyone attempts to register only the letters "CMU", the application will most likely not be granted as either Carnegie Mellon or Central Michigan will oppose it. It's simply too ambiguous at this point.

If I understand the use of the term "Typed Drawing", as used in the documents in TESS correctly, Carnegie Mellon is the registrant of the text "Carnegie Mellon" (and Carnegie-Mellon) regardless of stylization (search for "Carnegie Mellon" in TESS). Note the ® on the Carnegie Mellon Website. So, the words "Carnegie Mellon" cannot be used together in any form without violating the trademark.

As general trademarks go, Central Michigan University has trademarked their seal, the stylized "C", stylized "cmich" and some sort of building graphic, (search for "Central Michigan University" in TESS and select "Owner Name and Address" in the Field drop-down), they do not appear to have trademarked anything else. They have attempted to trademark the stylized CMU logo that includes the underline with "Central Michigan University" spelled out beneath it -- presumably because they couldn't anyway.

So, Carnegie Mellon, Central Michigan University, California Miramar University, Central Methodist University or anyone else in the world, for that matter, could put "CMU" on hats, shirts, mugs, etc. -- they just couldn't claim that it was a registered trademark. In fact, California Miramar and Central Methodist do refer to themselves as "CMU."

This is where memory comes in. When Carnegie Mellon couldn't register "CMU", they decided to instead depart from using the letters altogether and develop a logo with "Carnegie Mellon" spelled out. Before that, everything at the university shop had "CMU" on it. They registered this without problem, of course. They could have continued to sell merchandise with "CMU" and used it on their letterhead, etc., but why would they? Central Michigan was well-entrenched with the letters and a much larger school.

Carnegie Mellon is the registrant of the cmu.edu domain. Carnegie Mellon as one of the first half-dozen or so top-level domain registrants on April 24, 1985, (see http://www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timeline/) and was known as CMU on ARPAnet even before that (note that there were fewer than 10,000 hosts on the internet in 1985 -- probably only a few thousand). The trademark change in 1990 was a few years before the World Wide Web began to become anything like what it is today, so there wouldn't have been much concern with changing "cmu.edu" to "carnegie-mellon.edu" until it was not at all feasible (if it ever really was).

So, there is nothing wrong with saying "known as CMU". There are those of us who support the name change because it accurately identifies the university. It's sort of like how YOURSTATE State" people correct you when you say "University of YOURSTATE" and vice versa. Bsrbennett (talk) 06:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I remember seeing once a really bad low-budget movie (maybe a made-for-TV movie, I'm not sure) that was shot at CMU, but is not mentioned in the Movies filmed at Carnegie Mellon University article. It was about a female Secret Service agent in charge of protecting an African-American senator who was running for POTUS and was subsequently shot and killed in a hotel room. The actual story took place several months (years ?) after the assassination when that agent (now retired from the Secret Service) was living in Pittsburgh and dating an English professor from a fictional local university whose location happens to coincide with the CMU campus. Has anybody else seen that movie or does anybody remember its name ? 200.177.2.49 03:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This past fall the movie Smart People was shot on campus for several weeks in late October/early November, and again for a week in December. The story follows a widower English Professor openly stated to be a member of the CMU faculty, and his personal life as he finds a new love. Dennis Quaid plays the English professor, and Sarah Jessica Parker is the female lead, his newfound love. 76.18.209.17 03:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)nodono01[reply]

The Contemporary Carnegie Mellon section contains an entire paragraph of repeated information.

Also, the section is FAR too limited, as only a very limited spectrum of the contemporary conditions of Carnegie Mellon is accounted for. If you are going to list rankings, why not list ALL rankings, rather than focus on a selective few departments. I can list a BUNCH of other programs/departments in this university that are in the top 10:

• Heinz School ranked 8th overall (Public Policy Analysis 4th, Environmental Policy 7th, Health Policy 7th) by US News
• Psychology Ph.D ranked 9th (Cognitive Psych 2nd, Experimental Psych 5th, Behavioral Neuroscience 12th, Developmental Psych 12th) by US News.
• Bachelor of Architecture ranked 9th by Design Intelligence [3].
• MFA program ranked 10th (Multimedia/Visual Communications 2nd, Industrial Design 3rd*, Graphic Design 6th) by US News (*and Design Intelligence). And its pretty much common knowledge that the Acting, Musical Theatre and Directing programs in the School of Drama are among probably the top two or three in the country.

Beyond rankings, there is certainly much more pertinent information to add to this section. The school seems to be getting a lot of national press lately. An entire subsection could probably be written about the recent architecture and art installations that have completely veered off course from the appearance of the rest of campus. There are other items of importance too, I just can't think about them right now.

This section also seems to overlap with the Organization section (the academic units of the university may also count in this section). I think a slight overhaul is in order.

Sinisterminister 22:02, 9 September 2006 (EST)

It should be also mentioned that, in Philosophy, CMU is ranked # 1 in Mathematical Logic and, I guess, top 3 in Philosophy of Mathematics and top 5 in Philosophy of Science. 161.24.19.82 12:44, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no list of famous alumni.--Gkklein 22:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a significant gap between Category:Carnegie Mellon University alumni and List of Carnegie Mellon University people? --Matt 15:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a matter of readability, I think that there should be a short list of exceptionally notable alumni (and faculty!) on the CMU main page. The List of Carnegie Mellon University people is long, bloated and hard to get through; I know there are concerns about the main CMU article's own readability, but alumni and faculty are worthy topics to include. LuoYanshan 19:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This section is rather biased towards pop culture, with rather irrelevant references to Hollywood actors, movies. How about mentioning some of the other nobel prize winners? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.94.250.139 (talk) 02:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I checked this article a few months back, and there was a lot more information on it that I found of interest that has since been deleted, or moved and apparently not linked to. I would very much like to see the information on student organizations come back; organizations like Scotch 'n' Soda, for instance, have graduated people like Steven Schwartz and are quite well-known. I can see why we might not want all this on one page, but there *should* be a page for it. Greyscale 05:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the discussion to delete the two articles that I remember being split out: Carnegie Mellon in popular culture and Movies Filmed at Carnegie Mellon. I don't remember what happened to the student organization article. The problem with student organizations is defining the cutoff point for which are listed in the main article. --Matt 15:12, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why has this section been deleted ? It's a standard section in all college/university articles on the Wikipedia. 200.177.31.242 13:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If we followed the standard Wikipedia template, both "Carnegie Mellon in popular culture/fiction" and "notable student organizations" would have to be restored. It looks like the CMU article has been significantly downgraded.

I don't understand this logic. This section should be restored if it hasn't been already. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 18:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not actually sure it should be restored. Check out WP:TRIV. I actually find the section interesting, but it seems that Carnegie Mellon in popular culture might be fairly close to a Trivia section. What's your take? --Matt 03:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and delete then similar "trivia" sections in the Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Berkeley, Duke, Cambridge, Oxford, etc. articles !

My apologies to whoever made the old table of schools, but I think its purpose is better served with a concise listing of colleges as well as research institutes... notes about the college's founding and name should belong either in the college's own article or in the history section. As far as highlighting the good programs at CMU, I suggest -- although I don't have the time right now -- that we discuss the various departmental strengths in the Schools & Divisions section, instead of trying to cram noteworthy programs into the rankings section. As my note below indicates, I've already consolidated the programs mentioned in Rankings. LuoYanshan 20:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an orphan free image I stumbled across: Image:CarnegieMellonDownCut.jpg. --Strangerer (Talk) 22:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't Asa Packer of Lehigh be included in the list of Civil War industrialists who founded universities?

• I suppose he could, try adding it back again and posting a message to the user's talk page who removed it, asking them to explain the removal here before removing it from the CMU article page. PadreNuestro 01:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a new article on Carnegie Mellon University in the Portuguese-language Wikipedia. I would appreciate if any CMU student or alumni who is fluent in Portuguese could help expand it.

Please note that the article was originally written following the new spelling rules laid out in the 1990 Luso-Brazilian Orthographic Agreement. Whenever double spelling is allowed by the agreement, Brazilian variants were used (hence prêmio as opposed to European Portuguese prémio for example). Brazilian vocabulary was also used whenever it differs from European Portuguese usage (e.g. "pesquisa" instead of investigação). Please keep that in mind in order to preserve consistency in the text (see also Wikipedia conventions on avoiding the use of different varieties of the same language in the same article).

Thanks in advance for any help. Toeplitz 17:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No mention that for many, many years the cross country team held the NCAA record for consecutive dual-meet victories at any level? 68.35.62.251 (talk) 07:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Don't really care.[reply]

Isn't it weird to mention the orgin of the Cut without mentioning the requirement by the Hunts when founding Hunt Library that the space between the library and the Cut remain open until 2000 -- and that the University, in one of its smarter decisions, chose to respect that even after the expiration of the original promise? 68.35.62.251 (talk) 07:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Again, don't really care[reply]

I agree with the above comment for inclusion of this group. How many other universities' non-theatre population have been the genesis of Tony-award winning plays? I'm guessing none.68.35.62.251 (talk) 07:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Really, really don't care.[reply]

"the university had seven colleges and schools" is not accurate. There are many schools inside the colleges. The College of Fine Art has many schools in itself. Because there is a naming conflict between some of CMU's major and minor departmental divisions, it's not appropriate to use that sentence. How should we rephrase? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.237.227.231 (talk) 23:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think a section such as this is warranted, similar to the one for UC Berkeley. It could talk about How CMU students founded Jumiper, Sun Microsystems, Redhat, Lycos^[1] etc. How CMU projects such as Mach became part of OS X, AFS, Wireless Andrew, and Java's relationship to CMU. Other thoughts? Rootxploit (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]