Dear administrator, please add the following interwiki link:

[[ia:Patrono:Bot]]

Thank you in advance, Julian 12:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear administrator, please add the following interwiki links:

[[es:Plantilla:Bot]]
[[pt:Predefinição:Bot]]
[[ru:Шаблон:Bot]]
[[zh:Template:Bot]]

Thank you in advance, Julian 14:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} done. CMummert · talk 18:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}}

Please add [[pl:Szablon:Bot]] and [[simple:Template:Bot]] Also, the category might need to be noincluded. Thanks, Yonatan ^talk 18:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done. I haven't changed the category; it's set to sort to the start of the category when not included and to the bot's name when included. --ais523 13:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

The following interwikis have been found using Global Wikipedia Article Search:

[[af:Sjabloon:Bot]]
[[ca:Plantilla:Bot]]
[[gl:Template:Bot]]
[[hu:Sablon:Bot]]
[[id:Templat:Bot]]
[[it:Template:Bot]]
[[sv:Mall:Bot]]

Also consider moving the documentation to the main page using WP:DOC —Dispenser 05:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done, also moved documentation to Template:Bot/doc ^demon^{[omg plz]} 09:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}}

Could an administrator please add the following code:

[[Category:{{{1}}}'s Bots]]

in includeonly tags? It would be incredibly usefull for tracking all bot accounts by a specific user.

Thanks! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 09:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

N Not done This would create a lot of redlinked metadata categories with names that don't follow the normal naming conventions; please gain consensus for something like this first. (A better name would be something like 'Wikipedia bots operated by {{{1}}}'.) --ais523 10:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

{{Editprotected}}

There is a gap under the all the tag code between where the actual bot message ends and the <noinclude> tags start. Please fix, and make the <noinclude> tag appear immediately after all the tag code ends. +spebi ~ 08:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've known editprotected requests on other tags in the opposite direction, requesting the addition of space under the tag so that when multiple tags are used on a page they don't join directly onto each other but instead have a gap. That's likely to be less of a problem here, though. Do you think that despite this, the space should still be removed? Does anyone else have an opinion on this? --ais523 08:10, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I believe the gap should be removed, and if other users want a gap to separate the tag from other tags, they can add <br /> to the end of the tag.

It is slightly different with div tags, which probably makes other users' feel the need to add the gap at the end:

+spebi ~ 08:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh! Adding class="messagebox" creates a small space between each tag. +spebi ~ 08:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So what edit exactly should be made? --ais523 16:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Make the noinclude tag start on the same line that the tag table code finishes:

|}<noinclude>{{Bot/doc}}

instead of

|}

<noinclude>{{Bot/doc}}

Thanks, +spebi ~ 21:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 05:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Hi, could someone add an interwiki link to the Hebrew Wikipedia's version ({{he:תבנית:Bot}} or {{he:Template:Bot}})? Thanks in advance! —Ruakh_TALK 00:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, though the page with the interwikis is actually not protected (Template:Bot/doc). --- RockMFR 02:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, heh. Well, thanks even so. :-) —Ruakh_TALK 02:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone update all the interwiki's from nl:Sjabloon:Bot? Thanks. multichill (talk) 20:20, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

done Shii (tock) 00:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's located at: eo:Ŝablono:Bot

Thanks! -- Yekrats (talk) 12:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotect}}Apparently the bot that was converting pages to the newer {{documentation}} standard skipped this page due to the protection. See WP:DOC. — Dispenser 01:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotect}} Please replace the current image Image:Crystal Clear action run.png with Image:Crystal Clear action run.svg Thanks LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 17:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done PeterSymonds (talk) 21:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, is it just me who finds the svg version ugly? It is only slightly resembling its "original", has broken lighting which in turn breaks the 3D effect entirely (not to mention that it has not "Crystal Clear" feel whatsoever). It is not a suitable replacement until it's improved. Миша13 20:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Please replace the page with the following code:

{{Mbox
|image = [[Image:Crystal Clear action run.png|50px]]
|text  = <div>
'''This user account is a [[Wikipedia:Bot policy|bot]] operated by [[:{{{site|en}}}:User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[:{{{site|en}}}:User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]]).'''

It is not a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppet]], but rather an automated or semi-automated account for making repetitive edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually.

<small>''Administrators: if this bot is malfunctioning or causing harm, please [{{fullurl:Special:Blockip|wpBlockAddress={{PAGENAMEE}}&wpBlockExpiry=indefinite&wpAnonOnly=0&wpEnableAutoblock=0&wpCreateAccount=0&wpBlockReason=Bot%20malfunctioning:%20}} block it].''</small>
</div>
}}{{{category|[[Category:Wikipedia bots|<includeonly>{{PAGENAME}}</includeonly> ]]}}}<noinclude>{{Documentation}}</noinclude>

Thanks. —Ms2ger (talk) 15:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason you need to use {{Mbox}} directly, in stead of one of the others listed at Template:Mbox/doc? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to ombox, since it is only used in "other" namespaces. --- RockMFR 22:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to warn everyone ahead of time that there is discussion going on the bot owners' noticeboard regarding a proposed overhaul of the categories that govern bots and their classification. In light of this, this bot template could be used as a much more powerful tool in future. Don't worry, all existing templates will still work! Anyhow, all discussion welcome (best there, I think, rather than here). - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 10:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Remove one of the '}' from the end of the first parameter after 'user talk'. It's causing the user talk link to break apart. --Clark89 (talk) 04:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --- RockMFR 04:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

| inactive = Bot
The bot is currently inactive or approval has been withdrawn.

to

| inactive = Bot
The bot is currently inactive, but retains the approval of the community.

| unapproved = 
The bot does not yet have the approval of the community.

- Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 10:11, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done and Done. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Cardmaker)} 10:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fix my fail:

{{ombox
|image = {{#switch: {{lc:{{{status}}}}}| active = [[File:Crystal Clear accepted bot.png|75px]]| inactive = [[File:Crystal Clear denied bot.png|75px]]| unapproved = [[File:Crystal Clear denied bot.png|75px]]|[[File:Crystal Clear action run.png|75px]]}}
|text  = '''This user account is a [[Wikipedia:Bot policy|bot]] {{#ifeq: {{lc:{{{awb}}}}}|yes|that uses [[WP:AWB|AutoWikiBrowser]], }}operated by [[:en:User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[:en:User talk:{{{talklink|{{{1}}}}}}|talk]]).'''
It is not a [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppet]], but rather an automated or semi-automated account for making repetitive edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually.
{{#switch: {{lc:{{{status}}}}}
| active = [[Category:Active Wikipedia bots|{{PAGENAME}}]]
The bot is approved and currently active, the relevant [[WP:BRFA|request for approval]] can be seen [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/{{{brfa|{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}}|here]].<br />
| inactive = [[Category:Inactive Wikipedia bots|{{PAGENAME}}]]
The bot is currently inactive but retains the approval of the community.<br />
| unapproved = [[Category:Unapproved Wikipedia bots|{{PAGENAME}}]]
This bot does not yet have the approval of the community.<br />
|}}{{#ifeq: {{lc:{{{awb}}}}}|yes|<small>To stop this bot until restarted by the bot's owner, edit its [[User talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]].  ''Administrators: if this bot continues causing harm after receiving a message, please [{{fullurl:Special:Blockip|wpBlockAddress={{PAGENAMEE}}&wpBlockExpiry=indefinite&wpAnonOnly=0&wpEnableAutoblock=0&wpCreateAccount=0&wpBlockReason=Bot%20malfunctioning:%20}} block it] or remove from the [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage|approved accounts]].''</small>|<small>''Administrators: if this bot is malfunctioning or causing harm, please [{{fullurl:Special:Blockip|wpBlockAddress={{PAGENAMEE}}&wpBlockExpiry=indefinite&wpAnonOnly=0&wpEnableAutoblock=0&wpCreateAccount=0&wpBlockReason=Bot%20malfunctioning:%20}} block it].''</small>}}
|imageright={{#ifeq: {{lc:{{{awb}}}}}|yes|[[File:AWB_logo_draft.png|75px]][[Category:Wikipedia bots using AutoWikiBrowser|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}
}}<noinclude>
{{pp-template}}
{{documentation}}
</noinclude><includeonly>[[Category:Wikipedia bots by name|{{PAGENAME}}]]</includeonly>

- Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 10:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed again. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Cardmaker)} 10:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Could an admin change the 'unapproved' parameter to something like this, per point #2 here. Thanks, Richard⁰⁶¹² 11:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

| unapproved = [[:Category:Unapproved Wikipedia bots|{{PAGENAME}}]]
This bot does not yet have the approval of the community, or approval has been withdrawn, and therefore should not be editing.<br />

Also, to make it clear that unapproved bots should not be editing mainspace, could this:

{{#ifeq: {{lc:{{{awb}}}}}|yes|<small>To stop this bot until restarted by the bot's owner, edit its [[User talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]]. ''Administrators: if this bot {{#ifeq: {{lc:{{{status}}}}}|unapproved|is making edits to pages not in the operator's or its own userspace|continues causing harm after receiving a message}}, please [{{fullurl:Special:Blockip|wpBlockAddress={{PAGENAMEE}}&wpBlockExpiry=indefinite&wpAnonOnly=0&wpEnableAutoblock=0&wpCreateAccount=0&wpBlockReason=Bot%20malfunctioning:%20}} block it] or remove from the [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage|approved accounts]].''</small>|<small>''Administrators: if this bot {{#ifeq: {{lc:{{{status}}}}}|unapproved|is making edits to pages not in the operator's or its own userspace|is malfunctioning or causing harm}}, please [{{fullurl:Special:Blockip|wpBlockAddress={{PAGENAMEE}}&wpBlockExpiry=indefinite&wpAnonOnly=0&wpEnableAutoblock=0&wpCreateAccount=0&wpBlockReason=Bot%20malfunctioning:%20}} block it].''</small>}} be put in place of the current 'Administrators:' section. Richard⁰⁶¹² 12:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note though the exception for editing only the bot's/owner's userspace at WP:BOT#Approval. I don't know whether that's worth mentioning in the first bit or not. Anomie⚔ 20:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done This task. The Helpful One 20:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Can somebody fix the template so it doesn't categorize itself into the bot categories. Q ^{T C} 12:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sort of  Done - it's the documentation that is now causing the problem. Any ideas how to fix? - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 14:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It can be fixed through substing in the template on the /doc page, and then removing the categories, but I'm not sure whether that's desirable seeing as it will clutter the documentation quite heavily. Richard⁰⁶¹² 17:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} When the AWB=yes parameter is called, the resulting statement reads:

"This user account is a bot that uses AutoWikiBrowser,operated by <user> (talk)"

As you can see, there is no space between the comma and "operated". A very small problem I know but we grammar gnomes will thank you. Robert Skyhawk ^{So sue me!} (You'll lose) 04:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done –xeno (talk) 13:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've lowered the protection so the above folks can assist in tweaking this template to be all nice-like. Once the template is stable, feel free to jack it back up. –xeno (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]