Talk:Colgan Air Flight 3407: Difference between revisions
24.247.120.89 (talk) No edit summary |
→N200WQ: comment |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[N200WQ]] should redirect here. [[Special:Contributions/76.66.196.229|76.66.196.229]] ([[User talk:76.66.196.229|talk]]) 06:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC) |
[[N200WQ]] should redirect here. [[Special:Contributions/76.66.196.229|76.66.196.229]] ([[User talk:76.66.196.229|talk]]) 06:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
:No need for the redirect. Aircraft registration can be, and often are reissued. The unique identity of an individual aircraft if its ''construction number'' (c/n) or ''manufacturers serial number'' (msn). [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 06:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:52, 13 February 2009
Aviation: Accidents Start‑class | ||||||||||||
|
Disaster management Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
New York (state) Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Article title
Per precident, the title of the article should probably be Colgan Air Flight 3407; see, for example Comair Flight 191. There's no rush to move the article there, but I will likely do so tomorrow ... unless there are strenuous objections. -- Flyguy649 talk 06:13, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- All of the media (including CNN live right now) are referring to it as a Continental Flight. I don't see why we wouldn't just use the formula Continental Airlines Flight 3407, operated by Colgan... Joshdboz (talk) 06:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
The Continental website doesn't even call it Colgan Air Flight 3407. They call it Continental Connection Flight 3407. The news reports call it Continental. So Colgan is a 3rd and worse choice.
- [1] Read Seanwarner: Good night and good luck (talk) 06:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- And the medias wrong and so are you two. It was operated by Colgan Air, per policy it should be referred to as Colgan flight whatever —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanwarner86 (talk • contribs) 06:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Wikiproject naming guidelines don't trump general Wikipedia guidelines, which instruct us to use the most common and recognizable name in English. Joshdboz (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
I did a search under "Continental Express Flight 3407" and nothing came up so I started an article by that name only to find this one later. Why wasn't this one called by the correct title? Continental Express/Colgan is a separate airline from Continental. The two articles need to be merged now. Cla68 (talk) 06:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Because it is not a Continental Express flight. It is a Continental Connection flight. 24.247.120.89 (talk) 06:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- This article needs to be called Colgan Air Flight 3407. Lets set this straight right now. This is not continental express. this airlie is not owned by continental airlines. this is a colgan air problem. Please call it properly. dont let the media dictate what an encyclopedic entry should be.--75.157.210.26 (talk) 06:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- The only part they got wrong is stating that Continental is Dallas-based. Continental is Houston-based. Colgan Air was the airline involved in this accident and is a regional carrier that is contracted by Continental Airlines to fly flights under the banner of Continental Connection. Additionally, I think the "Continental Express Flight 3407" article should be removed...as the only carriers who fly under the banner of Continental Express are ExpressJet and Chautauqua and neither of them were involved in the crash. 24.247.120.89 (talk) 06:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
N200WQ
N200WQ should redirect here. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 06:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- No need for the redirect. Aircraft registration can be, and often are reissued. The unique identity of an individual aircraft if its construction number (c/n) or manufacturers serial number (msn). Mjroots (talk) 06:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC)