Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Erotica: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
NickK (talk | contribs)
m interwiki
76.115.99.116 (talk)
Line 9: Line 9:
[[Image:Francisco de Goya y Lucientes 011.jpg|thumb|''The Naked Maja'' (c. 1800–1803) by [[Francisco de Goya]].]]
[[Image:Francisco de Goya y Lucientes 011.jpg|thumb|''The Naked Maja'' (c. 1800–1803) by [[Francisco de Goya]].]]


Distinction is often made between erotica and [[pornography]] (as well as the lesser known genre of sexual entertainment, [[ribaldry]]), although depending on the viewer they may seem one in the same. Pornography's objective is the graphic depiction of sexually explicit scenes.<ref name=MIT>[http://www-tech.mit.edu/V116/N65/erotica.65l.html Erotica is Not Pornography], William J. Gehrke, ''The Tech'', December 10, 1996</ref> Pornography is often described as exploitative or degrading.<ref name=MIT/><ref name=India>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/815524.cms Don't confuse erotica with porn], Jug Suraiya, ''[[The Times of India]]'', August 15, 2004.</ref> Erotica, on the other hand, seeks to tell a story with sexual themes.<ref name=MIT/> It attempts to explore desire through mystery and intrigue.<ref name=India/>
Distinction is often made between erotica and [[pornography]] (as well as the lesser known genre of sexual entertainment, [[ribaldry]]), although depending on the viewer they may seem one in the same. Pornography's objective is the graphic depiction of sexually explicit scenes.<ref name=MIT>[http://www-tech.mit.edu/V116/N65/erotica.65l.html Erotica is Not Pornography], William J. Gehrke, ''The Tech'', December 10, 1996</ref> Pornography is often described as exploitative or degrading.<ref name=MIT/><ref name=India>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/815524.cms Don't confuse erotica with porn], Jug Suraiya, ''[[The Times of India]]'', August 15, 2004.</ref> One person's pornography is another's erotica, and vice-versa. In other words, if a politician or priest finds a work containing only consenting adults "perverted", then it says more about the mental state of the accuser than the intentions of the photographer or viewer.<ref name=MIT>[http://www.fotografics.org/article2.html], Roy Wallace, ''Erotica Vs Pornography'', 2004</ref>


In December of 2007 one of the world's largest collections of pornography and erotica, the ''L'Enfer collection'' housed at the [[Bibliotheque Nationale]] in [[Paris, France]], was opened for the public.<ref name=Ind>[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/europe/sex-please-were-french-pariss-dirty-secret-761348.html Sex please! (we're French): Paris's dirty secret], John Lichfield, ''[[The Independent]]'', December 3, 2007.</ref> Marie-Franoise Quignard, one of the collection's curators, tried to distinguish between the different elements in the collection:
In December of 2007 one of the world's largest collections of pornography and erotica, the ''L'Enfer collection'' housed at the [[Bibliotheque Nationale]] in [[Paris, France]], was opened for the public.<ref name=Ind>[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/europe/sex-please-were-french-pariss-dirty-secret-761348.html Sex please! (we're French): Paris's dirty secret], John Lichfield, ''[[The Independent]]'', December 3, 2007.</ref> Marie-Franoise Quignard, one of the collection's curators, tried to distinguish between the different elements in the collection:

Revision as of 07:35, 9 February 2009

Fernande (1910–1917) by Jean Agélou.

Erotica (from the Greek Eros—"desire") or "curiosa," works of art, including literature, photography, film, sculpture and painting, that deal substantively with erotically stimulating or sexually arousing descriptions. Erotica is a modern word used to describe the portrayal of the human anatomy and sexuality with high-art aspirations, differentiating such work from commercial pornography.[1] "Curiosa" is generally used to refer to erotica and pornography as discrete, collectible items, usually in published or printed form.

Various sub-genres of erotica exist. As with fiction as a whole, there are erotic stories with a science fiction, fantasy, horror or romance focus. Additionally, erotica can also focus on specific sexual behavior or fetishes such as BDSM, wearing uniforms, cross-dressing, polygamy and sexual promiscuity. Fan fiction featuring characters engaging in male homosexual acts has become known as slash fiction.

Erotica and pornography

The Naked Maja (c. 1800–1803) by Francisco de Goya.

Distinction is often made between erotica and pornography (as well as the lesser known genre of sexual entertainment, ribaldry), although depending on the viewer they may seem one in the same. Pornography's objective is the graphic depiction of sexually explicit scenes.[2] Pornography is often described as exploitative or degrading.[2][3] One person's pornography is another's erotica, and vice-versa. In other words, if a politician or priest finds a work containing only consenting adults "perverted", then it says more about the mental state of the accuser than the intentions of the photographer or viewer.[2]

In December of 2007 one of the world's largest collections of pornography and erotica, the L'Enfer collection housed at the Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris, France, was opened for the public.[4] Marie-Franoise Quignard, one of the collection's curators, tried to distinguish between the different elements in the collection:

"There is a photograph of an act of oral sex by the artist Man Ray.... For some reason, I find that this goes just too far. Perhaps because it is a photograph and so real, while engravings or lithographs, give you a certain distance and idealisation. Man Ray confronts you point-blank here with something which should, perhaps, better remain intimate."[4]

Erotic photography: A scene at a BDSM dungeon

The Canadian Supreme Court wrestled with the line between pornography and erotica going back to 1962's case Brodie v. the Queen, which involved D. H. Lawrence's erotic classic Lady Chatterley's Lover. In its decision on whether Lawrence's book was obscene, the court noted that it "has none of the characteristics that are often described in judgments dealing with obscenity --dirt for dirt's sake, the leer of the sensualist, depravity in the mind of an author with an obsession for dirt, pornography, an appeal to a prurient interest, etc."[5] In 1992, the Canadian high court changed its 'dirt for dirt's sake' test until it ruled in the case of sex shop operator R. v. Butler that a work is pornographic if it is "degrading and dehumanizing."[5] This remains the central test in Canadian courts.

In Ukraine, the national expert commission on public moral protection derived criteria on how to distinguish pornography from erotica.[6] According to the order, pornography is a detailed image of coitus and naked genitals for sexual stimulation without any artistic or educating aims. For an image to be considered erotica, the number of images can not exceed 20 percent of the total, nor 50 percent of the whole of an image. Erotica is a portrayal “without open visualization of genital interaction”. Pornography, according to the national expert commission, is a portrayal of group and homosexual intercourse, scenes of sexual violence and/or sexual perversions.[6]

See also

Template:Multicol

Template:Multicol-break

Template:Multicol-end

References

  1. ^ Pornography - MSN Encarta
  2. ^ a b c Erotica is Not Pornography, William J. Gehrke, The Tech, December 10, 1996 Cite error: The named reference "MIT" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  3. ^ Don't confuse erotica with porn, Jug Suraiya, The Times of India, August 15, 2004.
  4. ^ a b Sex please! (we're French): Paris's dirty secret, John Lichfield, The Independent, December 3, 2007.
  5. ^ a b Today's porn in it for the big titillation, Joseph Brean, National Post, February 11, 2008.
  6. ^ a b Order How to Distinguish Pornography from Erotica, Mignews.com.au, February 27, 2007.