Talk:Ecco Pro: Difference between revisions
m →this article reads like an advertisement: Just because something is exciting, does not mean it is an advert. |
|||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
:Read above comments, then looked closely at article text. Found & edited an instance of "even" (POV). Found other exciting words not POV -- they are objective and accurate. The FACTS of Ecco are exciting. The article is 'exciting' not because of POV language but because Ecco itself is vibrant. Interest in comment about what wording, specifically, is POV. |
:Read above comments, then looked closely at article text. Found & edited an instance of "even" (POV). Found other exciting words not POV -- they are objective and accurate. The FACTS of Ecco are exciting. The article is 'exciting' not because of POV language but because Ecco itself is vibrant. Interest in comment about what wording, specifically, is POV. |
||
::Please sign you entries. Being exciting and "vibrant" is inherently subjective thus POV. This article contravenes the [[WP:MOS|manual of style]] in many ways, from the inappropriate tone to the tons of [[WP:EL|external links]] directly in the text. It would take a lot of work to bring it up to standards, but it seems no one who knows about Ecco Pro wants to do it. I'd clean it up myself, but know nothing about the subject, so my edits would mostly be cutting inappropriate material out, which would translate into a major trim.--[[User:Boffob|Boffob]] ([[User talk:Boffob|talk]]) 03:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:30, 3 December 2008
I absolutely agree with Raymond - this article should not be deleted I consider it a balanced and accurate description of Ecco, which does indeed have a very loyal base of users many years after it was no longer supported Personal Info Managers are a hobby of mine and I see little fault at all with the article Grushevskogo (talk) 20:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
I don't see the need to delete the article
I was surprised to see a move to delete the Ecco Pro article. Even though Ecco Pro's development was commercially halted in 1997, it continues to retain a loyal user base and remains an inspiration to those who want to create a better personal information manager. See, for example, Scott Rosenberg's blog entries on Ecco Pro: http://blogs.salon.com/0000014/2004/12/14.html#a796 -- which is one piece of evidence pointing to Ecco Pro's notability.
Hence I took Ecco Pro out of the queue for deletion. (My understanding is that this is the proper protocol to follow.) I hope others will not put it back in.
Raymond Yee Nov 14, 2008
Misc
Recently saw someone clipped a 'looks like advertisement' tag on the wiki. Eh? Sounds too cool & exiting to be 'objective'. But, the program *is* cool and exciting. Its FREE. So, unless there is some mis-statement, or misleading or something, does not seem like advert to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.181.118.54 (talk) 03:27, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
A big issue (for this article and in general):
- Reference to SP2 breaking install, mentions alternate solution that I believe is only available at Compusol and after payment of a small fee. This represents a substantial barrier to entry by users who would like to do a test drive. We have a “vital” interest in keeping the product and unique features available to new users, because while Ecco may be showing its age, some people are leaving the ranks and new blood .would be good. While Ecco is doomed in the long-term, its unique abilities need to be on display for as long as possible so that we can hope for the development of a supported product with the same power
- Totally FREE SP2 and Vista EZ install solution is available at http:Forums.EccoMagic.com (*ABSOLUTELY NO MEMBERSHIP FEE*!!)
- FREE extension available at the 'new' Ecco_Pro forum even allows running exclusively from USB...
Additional Note from an Anonymous User:
I added a description of Ecco's columns-and-outline use that, I hope, is fairly clear without giving Wikipedia users a full user manual. But this page could use some good illustrative graphics.
Need:
- list of support sites (usually at the bottom of the page,
- a graphic of outline with columns with some data – possibly Will Ussery’s GTD template since that is a hot topic.
- A simple high level explanation of columns and the power they give
- a list of common problems and references or info on solution (reference compusol initially?, then maybe bring in here further down the road?)
- List of which Palm and Treo devices can be synchronized and limitations. Do some of their recent devices run the Microsoft flavour of PDA OS (and are therefore not compatible with Ecco?)
- stay compliant with Wikipedia formatting "standards".
- when we start to have subsections to deal with specific subtopics (some listed below) use format like what is used throughout Wikipedia. Would include automatic generation of table of contents etc.
- Open Source discussion
- Utilities in Yahoo library with some description (ideally by topic)
- Utilities such as EccoHelpers, Ivitar software such as VB toolkit etc,
- History of product. Introduced in, development stopped in ...
- Open Source discussion, respectful of Netmanage.
- Possible use of a portal down the road. (like a sub site I think)
Ted-Longstaffe 10:02, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
this article reads like an advertisement
to me at least, i feel like i'm being given a sales pitch. what's this about a "list of ecco wannabes"? there's nothing encyclopedic about that. there are also a lot of excited statements that don't suggest a neutral point of view. ("through the extraordinary step of disassembling and modifying the binary executable", "available here FOR FREE"). is there any need for there to be an external link to the programmer's current law firm? i could go on... 64.0.112.44 (talk) 09:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
1. relax. FREE and LEGAL. (1) the original program is distributed FREELY. (2) the modifications/extensions are overlays. FREE is ... FREE and LEGIT.
2. the disassembling of the binary executable to do what it now does, is extraordinary. If you think that term is not accurate to the fact... please give example of something you find "extraordinary". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.181.118.54 (talk) 03:32, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, the article reads rather too much like an advertisement and is unencyclopedic in several ways. I don't have time to fix it, nor interest in the topic, but am registering my thought here in order to begin to allow facilitate a discussion and consensus among those WP editors who do care to work on this. N2e (talk) 14:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with N2e. The page looks like an advertisement. It needs to be edited to remove all the POV language. lk (talk) 09:20, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Read above comments, then looked closely at article text. Found & edited an instance of "even" (POV). Found other exciting words not POV -- they are objective and accurate. The FACTS of Ecco are exciting. The article is 'exciting' not because of POV language but because Ecco itself is vibrant. Interest in comment about what wording, specifically, is POV.
- Please sign you entries. Being exciting and "vibrant" is inherently subjective thus POV. This article contravenes the manual of style in many ways, from the inappropriate tone to the tons of external links directly in the text. It would take a lot of work to bring it up to standards, but it seems no one who knows about Ecco Pro wants to do it. I'd clean it up myself, but know nothing about the subject, so my edits would mostly be cutting inappropriate material out, which would translate into a major trim.--Boffob (talk) 03:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC)