Talk:Fabless manufacturing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Colinbartlett (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Category == |
== Category == |
||
Changed the category from <nowiki>[[Category:Electronics manufacturing]]</nowiki> back to <nowiki>[[Category:Semiconductor_device_fabrication]]</nowiki>, which is a subcategory of the first. Fabless semiconductor companies do not produce other electronics than semiconductor electronics. Please explain why if you do not agree. --mabahj 00:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC) |
Changed the category from <nowiki>[[Category:Electronics manufacturing]]</nowiki> back to <nowiki>[[Category:Semiconductor_device_fabrication]]</nowiki>, which is a subcategory of the first. Fabless semiconductor companies do not produce other electronics than semiconductor electronics. Please explain why if you do not agree. --mabahj 00:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Citations == |
|||
There's almost no citations on this article. One reference to an outside site. Most of this seems like it is unsourced. I added the refimprove template to the top. |
|||
Revision as of 00:05, 24 June 2008
Self-promotion
I'd be curious to know if this article was written by one of the folks mentioned in it. Hopefully it's not a case of self-advertising. -- Nonstopdrivel 04:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm in a related field and know that the terminology is not BS. The specific folks mentioned, I dunno. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 20:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- "Fabless semiconductor company" is a very common term in the semi industry (and "Foundries" manufacture their designs), and the Xilinx story sounds right; I don't know the other company.
Category
Changed the category from [[Category:Electronics manufacturing]] back to [[Category:Semiconductor_device_fabrication]], which is a subcategory of the first. Fabless semiconductor companies do not produce other electronics than semiconductor electronics. Please explain why if you do not agree. --mabahj 00:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Citations
There's almost no citations on this article. One reference to an outside site. Most of this seems like it is unsourced. I added the refimprove template to the top.