Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John McCain, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John McCain was changed by Tcncv (u) (t) deleting 41895 characters on 2008-03-21T07:06:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Response: The error was caused by a simultaneous revert by myself and another user. The result was a truncated page. Cluebot corrected the error before I could. Tcncv (talk)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2008, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Rien   22:51, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Response: The error was caused by a failed revert action that resulted was a truncated page. RienPost corrected the error before I could. (Thank you for your diligence RienPost.) I have since restored the intended prior version. Tcncv (talk)

Hello... FYI, your note about intermediate versions should go to the IP User:124.82.76.79. My only edit to that page was a revert of vandalism one week ago. --Ckatz^chat_spy 18:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I'll resubmit my note, if it still applies. Tcncv (talk) 18:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For reverting my dumb friends' edits to Columbus High School (Georgia) Evan ¤ Seeds 03:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You made my day! Tcncv (talk) 03:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wup! SO sorry about that! κaτaʟaveno^T_C 02:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. We all have a slip of the mouse sometimes. Tcncv (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks foe letting me know. Smokizzy (talk) 03:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt vandalise Matthew Mcnair Secondary I AM A STUDENT THERE the VP's name was spelt wrong. And i am a previous student at hamilton elementary the Vice principal became a principal in a delta school and they have a new vice principal.

If your edits are a mix of vandalism and other edits, it's easily assumed that these other edits are also false. If you believe them to be true, you may add them back in and I will leave them alone. Tcncv (talk) 00:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's a good faith edit? --Deep Alexander (talk) 00:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, it means that I respectfully acknowledge that that your edit was made with the intention of improving the article, but after looking at my sources, I happen to disagree. However, my opinion isn't worth more than anyone else's. Wikiedia welcomes all productive contributions (subject to certain Wikipedia standards). I suggest you investigate the most common usage. If you believe your change to be correct, add it back in and I will leave it alone. Tcncv (talk) 00:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching the nice little rollback collision on the Hogwarts article. The other editor and I apparently were both trying to rollback at the same time and, well, you saw the result! --InDeBiz1 (talk) 05:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Things get dicey when there are multiple simultaneous vandalism IPs. Sometimes it's best just to compare to the prior day and rollback if there's nothing productive. --- Tcncv (talk) 05:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is absurd. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.33.13.233 (talk) 03:14, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In what way? Surely you can't expect your changes to go unchallenged, do you? -- Tcncv (talk) 03:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That picture of a Brontosaurus cannot be from 1905, there was no such thing as color back then. It must be from 1945 at the earliest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.245.207 (talk) 04:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new with wiki entries and appreciate your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.221.51 (talk) 03:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Revert on Bootloaders When you did a revert of my previous post was your intention to remove the rather large chunk of the page that you did? I've reverted your undo because the paragraph you deleted was nothing to do with my addition (and thus your "undo" of my edits was a false assertion). (Note from 22:01, 1 April 2008 88.106.191.225 - transferred from my home page, where it initially sat unnoticed, since the change didn't trigger an alert.)

Hello. Thank you for catching and correcting the material deletion. For some reason the rollback tool sometimes (very rarely) does not restore the entire article as intended. Not sure why - possibly a communication error. I usually check the results, but apparently didn't scroll down far enough to catch this one.

As for your changes to the article, I originally only reviewed your first change and was of the opinion that it contradicted the discussion of common multi-stage boot processes that appeared later in the article. That was why I attempted to roll it back. I now realize that I neglected to review all of your changes. Had I done so, I would have seen the overall positive nature of your edits and not taken the action I did. Please accept my apologies. I will strive to be more careful in the future.

And thank you for your contributions. -- Tcncv (talk) 05:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't think I did (I was using huggle). Thanks for putting them back. :) -Chetblong^Talk/_Sign 05:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. We all make mistakes. -- Tcncv (talk) 05:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey noobz. You toaly deleted my addition 2 god forbid n shit. liek dis is toaly uncalled for i was juz stating the obvious LOL. dey are toaly black people hahaha, and i got nuffin rong wit dat, itz juz so tru hahahaha. EDIT: When you sent me a message saying I made a questionable edit, you spelt "have" as "havde". You just lost the game. (Unsigned from 58.173.233.175 (talk) - 08:13, 8 April 2008)

If you disagree with my assessment, you have the ability to add the change to God Forbid‎ back in. I will leave it alone. Just be aware that due to the content of some of your other edits, you may find that your changes will be subject to a higher level of scrutiny. -- Tcncv (talk) 18:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...for the revert on my talkpage! —97198 talk 09:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on my talk page. Cheers! Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 00:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to remind you that using a level 4 vandalism template on a user that has not recieved ANY prior warning is agaisnt the wikipedia regulations.

Should you continue to do this further action may be taken by administrators. Prom3th3an (talk) 04:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]