You may have been redirected from:User talk: Anynobody

Archives

Archive - Archive 1 - 04/2007 - 05/2007 - 06/2007 - 06/2007 2 - 07/2007 08/2007 09/2007 10/2007 11/2007 12/2007 01/2008 02/2008 03/2008 04/2008

This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Iran-stamp-Scott2335.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, I honestly have no view on it one way or another and had edited it to remove three duplicate stamps. Anynobody 03:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no deadline. You are welcome to post it at WP:ANI to try and get someone to take action. I read the discussion a couple of nights ago and thought about it for an hour or so but was not ready to close the discussion. Much more has been added since then, but I have not had time to revisit it. -Regards Nv8200p talk 01:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you did such a good job with the Inex-Adria Flight 1308 image, I am making another request. I am interested in an image for the article concerning Turkish Airlines Flight 981. I am looking for a 1600 X 1200 image of this plane, if possible. I'll leave the details up to you. And003 (talk) 02:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, I shouldn't have much trouble doing this, luckily airliners.net has an image of the plane and have already done a DC-10 sans its rear cargo door for American Airlines Flight 96. Anynobody 03:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can also use this image as a reference for the right side of the aircraft. And003 (talk) 22:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I should have it done tomorrow :) Anynobody 02:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not amend the text that says "lost" to "sank". This issue is well discussed in the Talk section and "lost", the normal word in English for a ship that goes under the waves, is the best compromise after an extensive debate. "Sank" invites questions as to who sunk it, which is disputed. Thanks, bigpad (talk) 11:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't take this the wrong way but I'm going to move this to the article's talk page and respond there, this way anyone not watching my page can participate. Anynobody 03:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries and I've responded there. As a newcomer to this article, however, please be aware that your contributions, while welcome, do not necessarily help it! bigpad (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit-warring on the article, especially since there is a valid discussion going on. You're not helping the situation by repeatedly altering the infobox. You're on the verge of being disruptive. Please let the discussion run its course. Parsecboy (talk) 03:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]