This is my restarted talkpage, please respect wikipedia guidelines and be nice.

You had incorrectly tagged the article as copyright violation. The text was copied from [1] which is free use, as it mentions GFDL at the bottom of that page. I understand that you did that tagging under good faith, for even I have made such mistakes. However make sure in the future you check the copyright status of the webpage before tagging its wiki article under {{db-copyvio|url=}}. Thank You. Welt^anschaunng 10:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per your request on WP:RFR, I have enabled your account with the rollback feature. Please read documentation on the tool, and remember that it is to be used for the removal of vandalism only—it must not be used to aid edit warring.

If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me at my talk page. Best, AGK (contact) 21:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I wrote it - it's short and to the point :) thanks for checking though. SMC (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For examples of what a schoolip would write, have a look at my talk page history's reversions. And if you suspect vandalism in future, check the article (or user page's) history. SMC (talk) 12:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Josh, I am sorry to inform you that I have closed your RfA as unlikely to reach consensus: there was an 0:5 ratio against the request at the time of processing. However, don't be downhearted by this: I can assure you that your contributions are both highly welcome and valued—many editors have failed their first request for adminship, only to sail through later and become well-respected administrators.

You may wish to review the Guide to RfA before submitting future nominations, as well as well as here and here, both of which list the more highly-supported RfAs. Additionally, admin coaching is a useful aid for editors interested in becoming an administrator. If I can assist you at all, please do not hesitate to contact me. Kindest regards, AGK (contact) 19:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, and thanks for getting back to me. regards - Joshuarooney2008 (talk) 10:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the BBC WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the British Broadcasting Corporation.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Tiddly Tom (talk)

Josh, you tagged this page section about MPAA ratings as not having a worldwide view. If you review the discussion page on this article about the phenomenon of U.S. movie trailers, this was already addressed. There is the possibility of discussion of other ratings systems around the world being added, but the historical article about the U.S. movie trailer industry certainly merits a section about U.S. movie trailer ratings, as the entire process of editing trailers is (often mercilessly) ruled and enforced by the Motion Picture Association of America. Bsteph1 (talk) 02:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, thanks for letting me know. Joshuarooney2008 (talk) 18:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I must say, that was a rather mean thing to write, I am after all only new. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian Fletcher (talk • contribs) 10:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? If you were refering to the response I gave you on Jimbo Wale's talk page, I don't think that is mean at all, what I do think however, is comments like the one you left on his talk page are not appropriate, this is after all an encyclopedia, not a forum. Joshuarooney2008 (talk) 14:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you requested protection of User talk:Oh wiki your so fine your so fine you blow my mind for abusing talk page edit rights. Would you mind sharing some of those edits you consider abusive? — Knowledge Seeker দ 18:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, what I meant was, could you share the “diff” links to the specific edits you consider abusive? Are you referring to the unblock request to which I responded several days ago? — Knowledge Seeker দ 19:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes. That edit was inappropriate. However, it was two and a half days ago and he was already blocked for it (a block which was later removed). This is now well “after the fact” and I don’t believe that it is sufficient justification for protection. I’ll wait to see, though, if the protecting administrator can produce a better reason why the page should be protected. — Knowledge Seeker দ 19:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are referring to the block on User:Oh wiki your so fine your so fine you blow my mind? That block was a (somewhat questionable) username block; it was not issued for any wrongdoing. Did you consider simply explaining to him that he should use his new username instead of his old username to reply? And why does it matter if other users were trying to get him to communicate? He is free to communicate if he wishes. If that’s all there is, then I’m going to remove the protection.

On an unrelated note, I notice that on your user page, you state “This user believes that every Wiki edit should have a summary”, yet very few of yours do. Why is that? — Knowledge Seeker দ 19:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. Though if he makes edits like that, it would probably be better to block him rather than protect the pages he vandalizes. Let me know if you encounter any problems with him. — Knowledge Seeker দ 20:09, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I (grudgingly) understand and accept your protecting of my page, it has since been unblocked but I have learnt my lesson. Also what you said "Do you have any intentions of contributing to Wikipedia? If not, I can request you to be blocked" is a legitimate claim even though it was expressed a tad bit rude however I will contribute and I am looking at stubs on which to elaborate on or maybe even start my own article which you-never-know may become a featured article, that is admitably unlickely. By the way I think we have started off on the wrong foot and should be friends do you accept my apology and plea for friendship?

I am soooooooo glad you accepted my apology and that we are now friends. ‎ Adrian Fletcher (talk) 09:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you see there is this editor called User talk:TharkunColl who has a racist image on his user page, can you do me a favour and give him a warning about it or delete it.

thanks