Ancient Macedonian army: Difference between revisions
Reverting possible vandalism by Special:Contributions/24.222.172.3 to version by Wandalstouring. False positive? report it. Thanks, User:ClueBot. (136446) (Bot) |
Catalographer (talk | contribs) m →Phalanx: military equipment of Phalangites by [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arm%C3%A9e_mac%C3%A9donienne#Les_Phalangites French wikipedia] |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Neither Philip nor Alexander actually used the phalanx as their arm of choice, but instead used it to hold the enemy in place while their heavy [[cavalry]] broke through their ranks. The [[Macedon]]ian cavalry fought in [[wedge formation]] and was stationed on the far right; after these broke through the enemy lines they were followed by the [[hypaspist]]s, lighter infantrymen who served as the [[Monarch|king]]'s bodyguard, and then the phalanx proper. The left flank was generally covered by allied cavalry supplied by the [[Thessaly|Thessalians]], which fought in [[rhomboid]] formation and served mainly in a defensive role. |
Neither Philip nor Alexander actually used the phalanx as their arm of choice, but instead used it to hold the enemy in place while their heavy [[cavalry]] broke through their ranks. The [[Macedon]]ian cavalry fought in [[wedge formation]] and was stationed on the far right; after these broke through the enemy lines they were followed by the [[hypaspist]]s, lighter infantrymen who served as the [[Monarch|king]]'s bodyguard, and then the phalanx proper. The left flank was generally covered by allied cavalry supplied by the [[Thessaly|Thessalians]], which fought in [[rhomboid]] formation and served mainly in a defensive role. |
||
Other forces — [[skirmisher]]s, range troops, reserves of allied hoplites, [[Cretan]] [[archers]], and [[artillery]] — were also employed. The phalanx carried with it a fairly minimal baggage train, with only one [[servant (domestic)|servant]] for every few [[man|men]]. This gave it a [[marching]] [[speed]] that contemporary [[army|armies]] could not hope to match — on occasion forces surrendered to Alexander simply because they were not expecting him to show up for several more days. Phalangites were drilled to perform short forced marches if required. |
Other forces — [[skirmisher]]s, range troops, reserves of allied hoplites, [[Cretan]] [[archers]], and [[artillery]] — were also employed. The phalanx carried with it a fairly minimal baggage train, with only one [[servant (domestic)|servant]] for every few [[man|men]]. This gave it a [[marching]] [[speed]] that contemporary [[army|armies]] could not hope to match — on occasion forces surrendered to Alexander simply because they were not expecting him to show up for several more days. Phalangites were drilled to perform short forced marches if required. |
||
The Macedonian phalanx was not very different from the Hoplite phalanx of other Greeks states, save it was better trained, armed with the pike enabling it to outreach its competitors and stave off enemy cavalry, and wore far lighter armor enabling longer endurance and long fast forced marches, including the ability to sprint to close and overwhelm opposing positions and archers. In essence, the range of their counter-weighted [[sarissa]] pike, allowed them superior mobility as well as superior defense and attack abilities despite the encumbrance disadvantages of the longer weapon once trained up to handling it in formation. Centuries later, the [[Cantons of Switzerland|Canton]] organized militia of Swiss Pikemen enjoyed similar advantages over less well trained contemporary militaries which were identically equipped, which emphasizes the importance of training and unit cohesion in the scheme. In Phillip's and Alexander's time, the Macedonian phalanx had clear technical superiority. |
The Macedonian phalanx was not very different from the Hoplite phalanx of other Greeks states, save it was better trained, armed with the pike enabling it to outreach its competitors and stave off enemy cavalry, and wore far lighter armor enabling longer endurance and long fast forced marches, including the ability to sprint to close and overwhelm opposing positions and archers. In essence, the range of their counter-weighted [[sarissa]] pike, allowed them superior mobility as well as superior defense and attack abilities despite the encumbrance disadvantages of the longer weapon once trained up to handling it in formation. Centuries later, the [[Cantons of Switzerland|Canton]] organized militia of Swiss Pikemen enjoyed similar advantages over less well trained contemporary militaries which were identically equipped, which emphasizes the importance of training and unit cohesion in the scheme. In Phillip's and Alexander's time, the Macedonian phalanx had clear technical superiority. |
||
The armament of the phalangites is described by the military decree of Amphipolis (ca. 200 BC)<ref>[http://epigraphy.packhum.org/inscriptions/oi?ikey=152464&bookid=153®ion=4&subregion=11 Epigraphical Database] frg B.col I,2</ref>.It envisages the fines upon the soldiers deprived of the lawful armament. It refers defensive weapons as a non-metallic armour (kotthybos /[[Ancient Macedonian language#Macedonian words in Epigraphy|κότθυβος]]), an [[ogive]] helmet (kônos /[[Cone|κῶνος]]), a shield ([[aspis]] /ἀσπίς) and leggings (knêmides /κνημίδες).Offensive weapons ([[sarissa]] /σάρισα) and a short sword ([[machaira]] /μάχαιρα). The officers carried a metal half-armour instead of the non-metallic one. It should be stressed that the archaeological discoveries show that the phalangites could also use the two-edged sword ([[xiphos]]/Ξίφος) as well as the spear ([[doru]]/δόρυ) shorter than sarissa. |
|||
===Hypaspists=== |
===Hypaspists=== |
Revision as of 21:34, 4 January 2008
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/Battleofissus333BC-mosaic.jpg/330px-Battleofissus333BC-mosaic.jpg)
The army of ancient Macedon is considered to be among the greatest military forces of the ancient world. It became the formidable force known from history first under the rule of King Philip II of Macedon and then his son, Alexander the Great.
The military innovations, both in weapons and tactics, brought forth by Philip II of Macedon were what truly forged the army that conquered an empire. He turned warfare and combat into a way of life for the Macedonians, who until then had treated the military as a part-time occupation to be pursued during the off-season from farming. By introducing the military as a full-time occupation, Philip II of Macedon was able to drill his men regularly, building unity and cohesion. This created one of the finest military machines that Asia or Greece had ever seen, thanks to the amount of time and effort spent on maneuvers as well as military innovations.
Tactical innovations included the more effective use of the traditional Greek phalanx, as well as coordinated attacks (early combined arms) and tactics between his phalanx infantry units, cavalry, archers, and siege engines. Weapons introduced included the sarissa, a type of counter-weighted long pike, which created many advantages, both offensively and defensively, for the Macedonian infantry in particular, and for its combined military in general.
The armies created by Philip comprised an amalgamation of different forces. Macedonian and other Greeks ( especially from Thessaly,) and a wide range of mercenaries from across the Aegean . After 338BC many of Philip's new recruits for his planned invasion of Persia came from all over the Greek world and the Balkans, although the bulk of the army were from Macedon.
Macedonian cavalry
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Macedonian_Army_Alexander.jpg/280px-Macedonian_Army_Alexander.jpg)
The Macedonian cavalry were the elite arm of Macedonian forces. Arguably regarded as the best cavalry[1] in the ancient world. The heavy cavalry included the Companion cavalry, raised from the Macedonian nobility, and the Thessalian cavalry.
The Companion cavalry (hetairoi, mounted noble 'companions'; like philoi (basilikoi) '(royal) friends', the term became an aulic title in the diadochi period) was divided into eight squadrons called ile, 200 strong, except the Royal Squadron of 300. They were equipped with a 3 meter lance, the xyston, and heavy body armor. During the reign of Alexander the Great, cavalrymen carried no shields. However, the Companion cavalry of the Antigonid dynasty did carry large, round bossed shields of Celtic origin.
The organization of the Thessalian cavalry was similar to the Companion Cavalry, but they had a shorter spear and fought in a looser formation. The numbers given for Alexander's invasion of Persia stated that 1800 Thessalians were deployed for battle, fighting on the left flank, whilst the Companions had the same number on right flank (the right flank was a position of honour in Hellenestic armies, where the best troops would be positioned.)
Of light cavalry, the prodromoi (runners) secured the wings of the army during battle and went on reconnaissance missions. Several hundred allied horses rounded out the cavalry, but were inferior to the rest.
In battle, the Macedonian cavalry under Alexander and Philip II would hit the flanks or rear of the enemy, who would be trying to beat the phalanx of sarissa wielding pikemen in a phalanx. It seems to appear that Alexander would organize his left flank into a thin line to make it appear weak, while a massive phalanx would be on the right. The enemy would attack the left flank, and the phalanx would counter them, leaving the cavalry (behind the phalanx) to run around and attack the enemy infantry, or even the commander, as Alexander did when he defeated Darius once.
Macedonian Infantry
Development
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/92/Macedonian_Army_Pezetairos.jpg/280px-Macedonian_Army_Pezetairos.jpg)
The Macedonian foot soldiers were formed into an infantry formation developed by Philip II and used by his son Alexander the Great to conquer the Persian Empire and other armies. The main component of Macedonian infantry was the Macedonian Phalanx. Phalanxes remained dominant on battlefields throughout the Hellenistic period, although wars had evolved into more protracted operations generally involving sieges and naval combat as much as field battles, until they were finally displaced by the Roman Legion.
Philip II spent much of his youth as a hostage at Thebes, where he studied under the renowned general Epaminondas, whose reforms were the basis for the Phillip's tactics. Phalangites were professional soldiers, and were among the first troops ever to be drilled, thereby allowing them to execute complex maneuvers well beyond the reach of most other armies. They fought packed in a close rectangular formation, typically eight men deep (becoming sixteen men deep under Phillip), with a leader at the head of each column and a secondary leader in the middle, so that the back rows could move off to the sides if more frontage was needed.
Phalanx
The typical Macedonian phalanx was divided into groups of 800 phalangites, a formation devised by Philip, so enabling each unit to act independtly but be able to act cohesively with the other troops. Each phalangite carried as his primary weapon a sarissa, a double-pointed pike over 6 m (18 ft) in length. It is the belief of some that these pikes were so large and heavy that they had to be wielded with two hands in battle. The phalangite training was sufficient to permit proper use of the shield and sarissa. Before a battle the sarissa were carried in two pieces and then slid together when they were being used. At close range such large weapons were of little use, but an intact phalanx could easily keep its enemies at a distance; the weapons of the first five rows of men all projected beyond the front of the formation, so that there were more spearpoints than available targets at any given time. A phalangite also carried a secondary weapon, a short sword for close quarter fighting.
Neither Philip nor Alexander actually used the phalanx as their arm of choice, but instead used it to hold the enemy in place while their heavy cavalry broke through their ranks. The Macedonian cavalry fought in wedge formation and was stationed on the far right; after these broke through the enemy lines they were followed by the hypaspists, lighter infantrymen who served as the king's bodyguard, and then the phalanx proper. The left flank was generally covered by allied cavalry supplied by the Thessalians, which fought in rhomboid formation and served mainly in a defensive role. Other forces — skirmishers, range troops, reserves of allied hoplites, Cretan archers, and artillery — were also employed. The phalanx carried with it a fairly minimal baggage train, with only one servant for every few men. This gave it a marching speed that contemporary armies could not hope to match — on occasion forces surrendered to Alexander simply because they were not expecting him to show up for several more days. Phalangites were drilled to perform short forced marches if required.
The Macedonian phalanx was not very different from the Hoplite phalanx of other Greeks states, save it was better trained, armed with the pike enabling it to outreach its competitors and stave off enemy cavalry, and wore far lighter armor enabling longer endurance and long fast forced marches, including the ability to sprint to close and overwhelm opposing positions and archers. In essence, the range of their counter-weighted sarissa pike, allowed them superior mobility as well as superior defense and attack abilities despite the encumbrance disadvantages of the longer weapon once trained up to handling it in formation. Centuries later, the Canton organized militia of Swiss Pikemen enjoyed similar advantages over less well trained contemporary militaries which were identically equipped, which emphasizes the importance of training and unit cohesion in the scheme. In Phillip's and Alexander's time, the Macedonian phalanx had clear technical superiority.
The armament of the phalangites is described by the military decree of Amphipolis (ca. 200 BC)[2].It envisages the fines upon the soldiers deprived of the lawful armament. It refers defensive weapons as a non-metallic armour (kotthybos /κότθυβος), an ogive helmet (kônos /κῶνος), a shield (aspis /ἀσπίς) and leggings (knêmides /κνημίδες).Offensive weapons (sarissa /σάρισα) and a short sword (machaira /μάχαιρα). The officers carried a metal half-armour instead of the non-metallic one. It should be stressed that the archaeological discoveries show that the phalangites could also use the two-edged sword (xiphos/Ξίφος) as well as the spear (doru/δόρυ) shorter than sarissa.
Hypaspists
The Hypaspists (Hypaspistai) were the flexible arm of the Macedonian infantry; elite spearmen who would guard the flank of the phalanx, often with mixed troops such as archers,Agrianians and Thracian mercenaries. The hypaspistai were of Macedonian blood and formed the 3,000[3] strong foot bodyguard of Alexander II.
Other troops
Philip's conquest of Greece gave Macedon unpredecented control over a wealth of gold and silver mines, and other resources. As a result, Philip and Alexander hired thousands of multi-national mercenaries to strengthen their armies. Diodorus Siculus, a Greek historian, records troops as varied as archers from Crete, heavy cavalry from Thessaly (a condeferate state of Macedon), spearmen from Pontus and Phrygian[4] peltasts fought in the Macedonian army. These mixed troops provided added strength and flexibility to the armies that were continously depleted throughout Alexander's expeditious conquest.
Combined Tactics
The Macedonian army was one of the first military force to use combined tactics, making the variety of troops to fulfil specific duties and therefore to combine their strength.
The cavalry would mostly be positioned on a wing of the army and normally would wait for the Phalanx to lock the enemy in place before charging the flank or rear, often to devastating effect as very few enemies would deviate from the combat - a Greek phalanx would have physical difficulty and most opponents would be killed as they marched perpendicular to the line, then the now-free wing group would attack the main army's flank and begin an envelopment maneuver. This was not always used, however, at the Hydaspes River the cavalry moved far off to the left wing with a few pikemen and ambushed the Indians. At Gaugamela the cavalry moved straight for the Persian King and the hypaspists covered the flanks with the support of javelin skirmishers and allied cavalry. These proved important when the right wing cavalry hit the left guard under Parmenion, forcing the companions to pull back from their pursuit of the Persian left.
Decline
After the death of Alexander, the armies of the Diadochi period were equipped and fought mainly in the same style as Alexander's. Towards the end, however, there was a general slide away from the combined arms approach back to using the phalanx itself as the arm of decision, having it charge into the enemy lines much like earlier hoplites had. This left the formation fairly vulnerable — though near invincible to forwards assault, phalanxes like other infantry formations were fairly prone to flanking, and worse still tending to break up when advancing quickly over rough ground. So long as everyone was using the same tactics these weaknesses were not immediately apparent, but with the advent of the Roman legion they proved fatal in every major engagement, the most famous being the Battle of Pydna, as the Romans were able to advance through gaps in the line and easily defeat the Phalangites once in close.
See also
- Hellenistic armies
- Hoplite
- Pezhetairoi
- Companion cavalry
- Phalanx
- Sarissa
- Xyston
- Wars of Alexander the Great, (Battle of Granicus, Battle of Gaugamela, Battle of Hydaspes)
- Battle of Pydna
- Battle of Cynoscephalae
- Aelianus Tacticus
Notes
- ^ Diodorus Siculus, Arrian
- ^ Epigraphical Database frg B.col I,2
- ^ Ellis, J. R. (1976) p 27
- ^ Diodorus Siculus, Vol. XV1
References
- Diodorus Siculus, "Bibliotheca historica" (Historical Library) volumes XV - XVIII
- Ellis, J. R. (1976), "Philip II and Macedonian Imperialism"
Further Reading
- The Seventy Great Battles of All Time, Edited by Jeremy Black, Thames & Hudson Ltd, 2005