You have started an article about Vellore Institute of Technology with an incorrect spelling for Institute. Please check the spelling of the title before you start one. Thanks. Yogi 5:10, 6 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Please tell us what you consider to be wrong about that article. Plugwash 17:52, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically regarding "Please Don't Vandalise (Final Warning)". You do realize that this IP address represents thousands of individuals, and that probably only a handful of them have been vandalising. 15:44, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Judging by this user's edits, it is mostly the same user who has been vandalising using this ip address. Sfacets 22:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain these edits to Shot noise? — Omegatron 01:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverting vandalism on article Nitrous oxide here is heartily appreciated. Hope for your future collaboration. Again, thank you. Causesobad → (Talk) 17:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Might I recommend that you make use of this article's talk page rather than posting banners at the very top? Those are just going to be removed. Thanks. – Lantoka (talk) 20:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not going to argue one way or another that gun control is a civil liberties issue; but certainly, the view that gun ownership is a civil liberty is a highly contested one. When the article says, "He supports civil liberties except for gun ownership", it implicitly states that gun ownership is in fact a civil liberty--thereby taking sides on this controversial issue. That's why I removed the sentence. If you wish to discuss further, feel free to drop me a note at Talk:Raul Grijalva--I have it on my watchlist. Thanks! Meelar (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Might I suggest registering for a username? You can remain anonymous, but it's helpful to have a persistent identity. Best wishes.

In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect other forms of English in Wikipedia articles.

The guidelines are simple. For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, just ask anyone on Wikipedia and they will help you. Thank you. Readro 11:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Renewable energy. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Rmasbury 18:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Wind power, you will be blocked from editing. Sidasta 19:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for your contributions. Your contribution to has been determined to contain incorrect information. Editors adding new material should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information about this. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Corpx 18:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Paxton Media Group, you will be blocked from editing. SalaSkan 11:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Vaughan Road Academy, you will be blocked from editing. Johnny Au 02:26, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note: I'd appreciate any comments at Image_talk:Trinity_Trojan1.GIF regarding the potentially bad fair use rational, so that I can attempt to improve the situation or replace the image appropriately. Thanks! :) --Hebisddave 22:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Boondoggle, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Darkwind (talk) 19:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Conan O'Brien , even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Farosdaughter 16:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Delwar Hossain Sayeedi, you will be blocked from editing. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Thanks. Perspicacite 20:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making unintelligible edits to the Mach number article. EMBaero (talk) 00:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC)EMBaero[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Madurai, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. P|^|C (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Paducah, Kentucky (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 10:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]