Template talk:Wikipedias: Difference between revisions
Pavel Vozenilek (talk | contribs) →Volapük: new section |
m →Volapük |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
More details can be found on Meta, in discussion about the [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Volap%C3%BCk_Wikipedia proposal to close] this Wikipedia. Although the decision was to keep vo: it didn't change anythiong on the fact that there's practically no content. I believe having vo: on the same level as es: or ru: is unjust and farce. Since there's no indication that vo: has at least one thousand of human edited articles I left it out altogether. [[User:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek]] ([[User talk:Pavel Vozenilek|talk]]) 21:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC) |
More details can be found on Meta, in discussion about the [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Volap%C3%BCk_Wikipedia proposal to close] this Wikipedia. Although the decision was to keep vo: it didn't change anythiong on the fact that there's practically no content. I believe having vo: on the same level as es: or ru: is unjust and farce. Since there's no indication that vo: has at least one thousand of human edited articles I left it out altogether. [[User:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek]] ([[User talk:Pavel Vozenilek|talk]]) 21:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
alleged |
alleged |
||
:Any criticism of the Volapuk Wikipedia should also include other Wikipedias like the [[:lmo:|Lombard wikipedia]] which is even worse off than the Volapuk. It's about 100 articles away from reaching 100000 articles, and is terribly bloated with fluff and nothing (and I found a fair amount that is in English and not Lombard). Do we have a fair metric to remove Wikipedias off this list? For example: Maybe Depth must be equal to or greater than Log(<nowiki>{{ARTICLECOUNT}}</nowiki>)*2. So, then, a Wiki with 100000 articles must have a depth equal to or greater than 10 to be shown. (For Depth statistic, see [[meta:List of Wikipedias]]. The higher, the better.) Lombard's depth is currently ZERO, and Volapuk's is 2. By comparison, Norwegian's depth is 18, and the Rumanian depth is 16, and both are of comparable article-number sizes to the Volapuk and Lombard. What do you think? -- [[User:Yekrats|Yekrats]] ([[User talk:Yekrats|talk]]) 17:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:51, 20 November 2007
This template implies that there are only 14 Wikipedia language editions which have between 1,000 and 10,000 articles. But actually, there are 71. (See meta:List of Wikipedias.) I am not suggesting that the other 57 Wikipedias with that level of articles be added to the template. Actually, I would prefer that there be fewer Wikipedias listed in this template. It would be better to refer users to meta:List of Wikipedias if they want information along these lines. --Metropolitan90 17:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Volapük
I removed Volapük Wikipedia claiming to have 100,000+ articles. This Wiki has one active (and computer savvy) user and he generated most of the text using a bot.
More details can be found on Meta, in discussion about the proposal to close this Wikipedia. Although the decision was to keep vo: it didn't change anythiong on the fact that there's practically no content. I believe having vo: on the same level as es: or ru: is unjust and farce. Since there's no indication that vo: has at least one thousand of human edited articles I left it out altogether. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 21:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC) alleged
- Any criticism of the Volapuk Wikipedia should also include other Wikipedias like the Lombard wikipedia which is even worse off than the Volapuk. It's about 100 articles away from reaching 100000 articles, and is terribly bloated with fluff and nothing (and I found a fair amount that is in English and not Lombard). Do we have a fair metric to remove Wikipedias off this list? For example: Maybe Depth must be equal to or greater than Log({{ARTICLECOUNT}})*2. So, then, a Wiki with 100000 articles must have a depth equal to or greater than 10 to be shown. (For Depth statistic, see meta:List of Wikipedias. The higher, the better.) Lombard's depth is currently ZERO, and Volapuk's is 2. By comparison, Norwegian's depth is 18, and the Rumanian depth is 16, and both are of comparable article-number sizes to the Volapuk and Lombard. What do you think? -- Yekrats (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)