Talk:American Family Association: Difference between revisions
Christopher Mann McKay (talk | contribs) Headers |
restoring discussion that was dismissed by CMMK and Orpheus |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*[[/Archive 3|Archive 3]]: [[2007-08-16]]—[[2007-09-21]] |
*[[/Archive 3|Archive 3]]: [[2007-08-16]]—[[2007-09-21]] |
||
}} |
}} |
||
==Removal of AFA views from the article== |
|||
Orpheus, I refer to this link that was just archived by CMMK [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAmerican_Family_Association%2FArchive_3&diff=159451324&oldid=159368914]. You two have not been explaining over and over, you have been repeatedly dismissing sourced views. The "not a press release, detailed directory" objection simply doesn't hold. There is no policy on those points, and concisely presented sourced views do not apply. Summary style is WP style. I have explained that the important parts of what you keep deleting are simply deleted from the article. So the views are being suppressed. Two editors repeatedly deleting and dismissing reliable sources and discussion does not mean consensus. I am totally willing to apply for outside input on this matter and therefore I am totally willing to listen to Wikipedia community input. You can keep trying to dismiss my comments if you like, but its not going to stop me from applying Wikipedia policies to the article. [[User:Hal Cross|Hal Cross]] 02:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:01, 22 September 2007
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Removal of AFA views from the article
Orpheus, I refer to this link that was just archived by CMMK [1]. You two have not been explaining over and over, you have been repeatedly dismissing sourced views. The "not a press release, detailed directory" objection simply doesn't hold. There is no policy on those points, and concisely presented sourced views do not apply. Summary style is WP style. I have explained that the important parts of what you keep deleting are simply deleted from the article. So the views are being suppressed. Two editors repeatedly deleting and dismissing reliable sources and discussion does not mean consensus. I am totally willing to apply for outside input on this matter and therefore I am totally willing to listen to Wikipedia community input. You can keep trying to dismiss my comments if you like, but its not going to stop me from applying Wikipedia policies to the article. Hal Cross 02:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)