Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Genderfuck: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Celithemis (talk | contribs)
use of parody; add a citation
Now has in-text citations
Line 64: Line 64:


==Sources==
==Sources==
{{Nofootnote}}
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin}}
*Thomas, Calvin, ed. (2000). ''Straight with a Twist: Queer Theory and the Subject of Heterosexuality''. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-06813-0.
*Thomas, Calvin, ed. (2000). ''Straight with a Twist: Queer Theory and the Subject of Heterosexuality''. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-06813-0.

Revision as of 21:12, 2 September 2007

Genderfuck is a self-conscious effort to "fuck with" or play with traditional notions of gender identity, gender roles, and gender presentation.[1] It uses parody and exaggeration to call attention to its transgression of gender roles, seeking to expose them as artificial.[2] The practice has been cited by June Reich (Reich, 1992) as destabilising gender as an analytical category and subverting the possibility of a unified subject.[3]

Examples of genderfuck in relation to physical performance or appearance include people prominently displaying secondary sex characteristics of different genders together, such as breasts and a beard.

The term dates at least to 1974, when an article by Christopher Lonc, entitled "Genderfuck and Its Delights", appeared in the magazine Gay Sunshine. Lonc wrote "I want to criticize and poke fun at the roles of women and of men too. I want to try and show how not-normal I can be. I want to ridicule and destroy the whole cosmology of restrictive sex roles and sexual identification."[4]

Genderfuck is generally an intentional attempt to present a confusing gender identity which contributes to dismantling the perception of a gender binary.[original research?] Genderqueer presentation may or may not deliberately include elements of genderfuck, which is also the case with those identifying as transgendered.

Genderfuck implies not only the instigation of confusion for the sake of breaking down the binary, but also leaving more fluid room to be self-expressive and self-explorative with less expectations of a norm and more room to play via being radically honest.

See also

Sources

  • Thomas, Calvin, ed. (2000). Straight with a Twist: Queer Theory and the Subject of Heterosexuality. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-06813-0.
  • McKenna, Jack (2000). "How I Became a Queer Heterosexual", p.65.
  • Stepp, Meredith (2005-07-15), "Playing our parts in 'genderfuck'", Southern Voice

References

  1. ^ Lawless, Elaine J. (Winter 1998). "Claiming Inversion: Lesbian Constructions of Female Identity as Claims for Authority". The Journal of American Folklore. 111 (439): 3–22. Retrieved 2007-08-30.
  2. ^ Wilkinson, Sue and Celia Kitzinger (1996). "The Queer Backlash". In Bell, Diane (1996). Radically Speaking: Feminism Reclaimed. London: Zed Books. pp. 375–382. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) Quoted in Weedon, Chris (1999). Feminism, Theory, and the Politics of Difference. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. pp. 74–75. ISBN 0-631-19824-5.
  3. ^ Reich, June L. (1992). "Genderfuck: the law of the dildo". Discourse. 15 (1): 125. On genderfuck: The effect of unstable signifying practices in a libidinal economy of multiple sexualities… the destabilisation of gender as an analytical category, though it is not, necessarily, the signal of the end of gender… the play of masculine and feminine on the body… subverts the possibility of possessing a unified subject position. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ Quoted in Bergman, David (1993). Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. p. 7. ISBN 0-87023-878-7.