Talk:Immortal Technique: Difference between revisions
Christopher Mann McKay (talk | contribs) Removed fair use warnings because I added the fair use rationales and it clutters the talk page. |
Christopher Mann McKay (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|3={{WikiProject Hip hop|class=start}}}} |
|3={{WikiProject Hip hop|class=start}}}} |
||
{{archive box|[[/Archive 1|Archive 1]] [[/Archive 2|Archive 2]]}} |
{{archive box|[[/Archive 1|Archive 1]] [[/Archive 2|Archive 2]]}} |
||
==Misogyny== |
==Misogyny== |
Revision as of 04:48, 9 July 2007
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Misogyny
"And to the niggaz that write this website with friend requests one day and then talk shit to my staff the next day because I'm making moves and can't talk to you personally...grow up nigga. Big L said it best "You fuckin male groupie you oughta be ashamed of yourself." I only work on music, hood power moves, and Revolutionary projects with soldiers, not bitches. And I don't mean 'bitches' as in women. Because women are strong, they are beautiful, intelligent, they have carried us through all our hardships and they gave birth to Revolution. I mean bitches like ya'll niggaz ain't a men or a women, you're like the fuckin' dogs described in Qu'ran, animals that eat food off the floor and carry germs. Little Shaytan dicksucking ass niggaz. Fuck outta here. If I had the time I'd burn your mothers house down you half a fag fruit pop mandarin name droppin no talent fake fuck. I hope you talk the talk when you see me in person and don't try to get close to me trying to act like you down with this movement." - taken from http://www.immortal-technique.com/home.html
There, he actually posted that message concerning some tour he was on, I hope you dumbasses can finally get that in hip hop bitches isn't always used as an insult to women.
PS- For some reason, it wouldn't let me post this comment because it said all myspace links were blacklisted so I had to remove them, if there is a way to post comments without removing them, then I'm sorry, but I do not know how and it said I should just remove all of the links that lead to the blacklisted sites. --- Efil4tselaer (talk · contribs) 23:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Also I found this from the same website,
"... It is a progressive step and a life changing process that forever restructures an individual such as Malcolm-X- and founding members of the Zulu Nation. However, a Revolutionary that becomes a gangsta is usually one that has become corrupted by power. A gangsta is in the business of extortion, gambling, murder, and prostituting our greatest resource and the soul of our people, our women. ...".
He says women are our greatest resource and the soul of our people, honestly, you guys take lyrics much too seriously. --- Efil4tselaer (talk · contribs) 23:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Archived page
Moved dated discussion to archive pages.--NPswimdude500 01:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Updated Upcoming projects and events
I added that Immortal Technique will be on the Rock The Bells tour this summer. -Bruno
User: 87.186...
I do not understand why you keep reverting my edits, I added categories, fixed some links such as [[2001]] to [[2001 in music]], added a link to the theory of the controlled demolition of the WTC, and a few other things. Why do you keep reverting to an old version? What you are doing is you are trying to take possession of this article, which is wrong. You keep reverting to a previous version of the page because you don't like how the "External links" section is made. Now, to show you that there is no need for how you formatted the "External links", or that it is actually wrong, I am going to use the Dr. Dre article as an example:
- You change [http://www.viperrecords.com/ Viper Records official website] to [http://www.viperrecords.com/ viperrecords.com] Viper Records official website. What is the point of doing that? Here, look at how Dr. Dre's article links to his Aftermath Entertainment label (I am not the one that made it like that, in fact, I barely edit the article): [http://aftermath-entertainment.com/ Aftermath Entertainment website]. There, another article uses it like that, why do you keep changing it to where it says "Viper Records official website" outside those brackets?
- You change [http://www.babygrande.com/artists.jsp?artist=14 Biography of Immortal Technique at Babygrande.com] with a free MP3 download of "Bin Laden" to [http://www.babygrande.com/artists.jsp?artist=14 babygrande.com page] with free mp3 download of ''Bin Laden'' (you used to put "Bin Laden" Pt. 1, until I told you there's only "Bin Laden", and "Bin Laden (Remix)"). First of all, when I first read that, I thought it might be something like some MySpace page or something like that, like an unofficial website or whatever, but when I checked to see what it is, I saw it is just a biography of Coronel. That is why I changed it, because it describes it better, it tells you it is a biography, not just the rather vague "babygrande.com page". Also, I am telling you to write "MP3", as "MP3", not "mp3", look at the MP3 article, it writes it as "MP3" all the time, so maybe we should write it like that article does, if they wanted to write it like "mp3", we could write it like that, but since they are writing it like "MP3", then we should use it as they are using it. I for one trust that article more than I trust you.
- You change [http://not-in-our.name/redir/immortaltechnique/ Immortal Technique discography website] complete list of recordings to [http://not-in-our.name/redir/immortaltechnique/ Immortal Technique Discography Site] complete list of recordings. First, it is not "Site", it is "Website", so again you are wrong. Second, if we do not capitalize "Viper Records official website", then we do not capitalize "Immortal Technique discography website". You do not capitalize those words. See here [http://www.dubcc.com/forum/index.php?topic=30148.0/ Dr. Dre productions @ Dubcc.com], it only capitalizes his name, but not productions, so just leave it like that.
- Also, you removed all of my categories (although there are other things I can say that you removed while you reverted, this is the most important one):
- Category:Rappers known by pseudonyms
- Category:People from Manhattan
- Category:Freestyle rappers
- Category:Rappers
- Category:Underground hip hop musicians
- Category:Hip hop musicians
You even have the nerve to call my edits vandalism. I mean, no matter what, MY edits are not vandalism, even if I am not right and you might be right about how you write those external links, my edits are certainly not vandalism, for one, if they are wrong, you did not show me any proof, or anything, and second, I am using another article as an example, so the way I am writing it is used by other articles too. Also, you are the one who is vandalizing because you removed the categories. I suggest you stop, and stop using rude, vulgar, and insulting summaries, like when you said I'm "stupid as fuck". --- Efil4tselaer 20:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
all you do is vandalisimg the article. i wont get further into it, just one thing: its "site" not "website", are you not only retarded but also illiterate?! --87.186.33.22 13:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Funny, but, you are wrong, and you are the one that is illiterate, "vandalisimg"? "its"? (maybe it's) "wont"? Damn your grammar is horrid. Also no, it is not "site", where do you think you get "site"... "website" maybe? Anyway, I am not the one vandalizing, no one really cares about what you have to say since you are a pathetic vandal. You are the reason why the article has been semi-protected, I guess that means that you vandalized. You are the one that keeps vandalizing the article, not me, and now you will be blocked forever until you stop vandalizing this article. --- 74.109.26.185 00:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Marxist?
"Many of his views align closely with contemporary Marxism, as can be seen in the song "The Poverty of Philosophy" from Revolutionary Vol. 1." - Can someone please explain what exactly Felipe says in "The Poverty of Philosophy" that aligns him closely with contemporary Marxism. I have listened to the song and read the lyrics and I can find no connection. —User:Christopher Mann McKay 02:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- "The povery of philosophy" is an essay by Marx in response to Proudhon's "the philosophy of poverty". Numerous songs by tech make reference to socialism, and socialist ideals, but whether its of the marxist strain is a largely academic question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Immanuel goldstein (talk • contribs) 23:29, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- From what I can tell from his lyrics, he holds some socialist views favorably, but I wouldn't go so far to say his views "align closely with contemporary Marxism." There needs to be a source for this statement, else I'll reword it. —Christopher Mann McKayuser talk 22:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)