Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Global warming on other planets page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --172.165.169.16 18:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NAU.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2009 Lok Sabha elections, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tikiwont 10:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as 2007 invasion of Iran) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Seinfreak37 17:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that we already have Plans for strikes against the Iranian nuclear program. In the event that someone invades Iran, this page will likely become the article on the invasion. Hut 8.5 17:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great link! It makes an excellent addition to the article. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Global warming happening on other planets. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) 16:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Global warming on other planets, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Greatestrowerever 13:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am deleting the article, coz it does not provide any info whatsoever at the moment. When you or your friends get the time to coalesce information from the links, please recreate the article back then only. Thanks.

In case you need the links, I am putting them here:

• http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/17/222712/69
• http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/U/ukweather2080/guides/planets.html
• http://motls.blogspot.com/2006/05/global-warming-on-jupiter.html
• http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2002/pluto.html
• http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=192
• http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20070404/sc_space/duststormsfuelglobalwarmingonmars;_ylt=AiVxN.mGF7G8fZ3EHMojv.3MWM0F
• http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060504_red_jr.html
• http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/1998/triton.html
• http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200607/s1697309.htm
• http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread221608/pg1

When you write the article, make sure it is properly attributed and the information comes from reliable sources. Also, make sure it is free of any personal bias. Good luck with the article. Also, it has to meet the notability guidelines, otherwise it might be deleted. Good luck with the article. --soum (0_o) 17:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The primary reason we don't need Hoagland's stuff here is notability. Some 9/11 conspiracy theories are well known and deserve being mentioned, but "artificial Iapetus" is certainly not. Wikipedia is not a collection of crackpot theories.--JyriL ^talk 13:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manchu, I got an unsigned comment on my talk page from you regarding some edit I made. I suppose you referred to my edit of 17 April on the Conjunction page, when I removed a link to your site. It is a spamlink. From what I can tell, your website deals with your private occultist conspiracy fantasy, and that is not a generally accepted explanation of the significance (if conjunctions even have any significance at all) of a specific conjunction: so it has no place in an encyclopedia. Your Talk page is full of complaints of your vandalism. Stop propagating BS. Tom Peters 11:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

plz dont remove it,its important.

It's not accurate though --Bugguyak 15:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• thanks for adding that new sightings! i went ahead and fixed the way it was cited, and I removed the blog reference because they got their source from the Times of India which you already referenced (:O) in the future, you may want to try to use the wikipedia template for citing a reference Wikipedia:Citation_templates.
  

As for creating a new India article just on UFO sightings, first create some main articles on an event that occured so that we can link to it, for example for UFOsightings in Brazil notice how each sighting has a main article, so first create some main articles on India UFO sightings so that we can create a UFO sightings in India article to list them, hope this makes sense? if not let me know. (:O) -Nima Baghaei ^{talk · cont · email} 18:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]