User talk:Bunnypranav: Difference between revisions
→User right to blank their Talk page: Please do not restore blanked warnings on someone else's user Talk page; they have the right to do so. In addition, you are required to understand Wikipedia policies and guidelines before using RedWarn to perform rollbacks or other actions. |
Closing deletion discussions |
||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
Hi, Bunnypranav. Please do not restore blanked warnings on someone else's user Talk page after the user has decided to delete them, as you [[Special:Diff/1261142736|did here]] at [[User talk:Robenceic]]. With [[WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK|limited exceptions]], users may [[WP:BLANKING|remove anything they like]] from their own Talk page. See [[WP:OWNTALK]] and [[WP:DRRC]]. In addition, please read the warning at the top of [[Wikipedia:RedWarn]]; please make sure you understand the [[WP:PG|Wikipedia guidelines and policies]] involved before issuing any warning to another user or carrying out any rollback using Redwarn. Thanks, [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 20:12, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
Hi, Bunnypranav. Please do not restore blanked warnings on someone else's user Talk page after the user has decided to delete them, as you [[Special:Diff/1261142736|did here]] at [[User talk:Robenceic]]. With [[WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK|limited exceptions]], users may [[WP:BLANKING|remove anything they like]] from their own Talk page. See [[WP:OWNTALK]] and [[WP:DRRC]]. In addition, please read the warning at the top of [[Wikipedia:RedWarn]]; please make sure you understand the [[WP:PG|Wikipedia guidelines and policies]] involved before issuing any warning to another user or carrying out any rollback using Redwarn. Thanks, [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 20:12, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
==Closing deletion discussions== |
|||
Hello, Bunnypranav, |
|||
Just a reminder that XFD discussions are scheduled to last at least 7 full days. Do not close discussions hours early. I've seen last minute participation change a closure decision so unless a discussion is eligible for a [[Wikpedia:SNOWCLOSE|Snow closure]], do not close them before the 7 day requirement. Thank you. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 21:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:35, 17 December 2024
It is 6:49 AM where this user lives. |
At-large fixing
Copied from the AWB tasks discussion:
- Thanks! If you'd like to do more, with "At-large" in other contexts, take a look at this search, which is mostly in the title bar of infoboxes. Or these in links from templates such as Main and Further. Or these in a common text phrase. Dicklyon (talk) 16:42, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also these, but be careful as a few are in reference titles and such that should be left in title case. Dicklyon (talk) 16:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- And these, too. Dicklyon (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, will go through this once I get time. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 04:45, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from Pereyankee on Sociology (19:46, 13 December 2024)
How does sociology came into gain --Pereyankee (talk) 19:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Pereyankee Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I did not understand your question, could you please be a bit clear? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 01:42, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from Muslim niazai on Skechers (19:47, 13 December 2024)
Hi how are you my nema is Muslim niazai I am from Afghanistan I whant this item skechers 200 --Muslim niazai (talk) 19:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Muslim niazai Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately I cannot help you to buy the shoe. If you want some help regarding factual questions, please ask it at Wikipedia:Reference desk. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 01:41, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from Minzdaniel89 (13:19, 14 December 2024)
Hello,
I am a Portuguese scientist, living in London, whose goal is to create profiles for world-renowned scientists who are not on Wikipedia.
Can you help with that?
- Hey @Minzdaniel89, and welcome to Wikipedia! If you want to create new article, have a look at Help:Your first article for some basic guidelines and policies we have to follow. Consider developing a Wikipedia:Drafts article first. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:23, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Alternate titling during RM discussions
Hi there. During your relisting you proffered a different title that was already part of the original nom. May I suggest that you should avoid closing this discussion if you make such a question as it can appear as a form of a super vote. Mentioning this isn’t a bad idea, as sometimes when relishing you can see consensus leaning a specific way and want to call attention to it, but even in those cases I would discourage you from closing as it introduces your relisting comment as now being an involved editor versus uninvolved. TiggerJay (talk) 06:03, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Tiggerjay, sorry for the delayed response.
- I didn't clearly realize that the alt title was already mentioned in the nom, seeing some comments leaning to another title I thought I'd relist it to see which one is more preferred by the community. Now that I see it, I should have written the comment asking for clear opinion on which title is preferred, due to the almost split arguments. I have struck the comment which might look like a vote.
- Anyways, based on my limited activity at RM compared to other closers, this will probably be closed by someone else other than me. I'll still keep in mind to avoid this in-case any opposition due to my probable involvement might arise. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yep, no problem... I've seen things become contentious before with relisting comments being brought up at move reviews if the same person closes them, so I just wanted to caution you. TiggerJay (talk) 15:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:54, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yep, no problem... I've seen things become contentious before with relisting comments being brought up at move reviews if the same person closes them, so I just wanted to caution you. TiggerJay (talk) 15:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from Mark Stuart Hutchison (22:57, 16 December 2024)
I was wondering if you could download an article I tried to get posted on wiki from my google drive and be so kind as to give an opinion as to whether you think it is rubbish or possibly has some merit requiring further investigation which seems to be the opinion of Consensus AI . I have been collaborating with Consensus AI on a radical bipolar symmetry which maps energy to a 4D bipolar space. There is an introduction by Consensus AI followed by my description. This symmetry is cyclic and has no origin like the ridiculous big bang. My google drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1x37DyP5ms7vQ_7VQbdH6S9aLgk_IeIL-?usp=sharing Make sure you download the BipolarUniverse_Edit.docx and not the unedited original. Here is a link to my conversations with Consensus AI: https://chatgpt.com/share/675dec33-75e8-8007-9896-7bb85ef4cb78 Consensus AI was going to try and post the BipolarUniverse_Edit.docx on arXiv site but seems to be encountering some delays. I don't know if they are just formatting obstacles or a lack of finding anyone to endorse publication. The draft submission is at : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cyclic_Bipolar_Universe Yours sincerely, mark hutchison. --Mark Stuart Hutchison (talk) 22:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Mark Stuart Hutchison, your draft submission has been rejected by @SafariScribe. My review as well stand with them, this article looks more like a story or an original research publishing. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:44, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from AmericanTFPPresident on Mario Amadeo (15:28, 17 December 2024)
Hi. I just made an edit, but am not seeing it in the article. Is there a waiting period before it is made public? --AmericanTFPPresident (talk) 15:28, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @AmericanTFPPresident, based on your contributions, you have added some text, and removed it yourself. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
User right to blank their Talk page
Hi, Bunnypranav. Please do not restore blanked warnings on someone else's user Talk page after the user has decided to delete them, as you did here at User talk:Robenceic. With limited exceptions, users may remove anything they like from their own Talk page. See WP:OWNTALK and WP:DRRC. In addition, please read the warning at the top of Wikipedia:RedWarn; please make sure you understand the Wikipedia guidelines and policies involved before issuing any warning to another user or carrying out any rollback using Redwarn. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:12, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Closing deletion discussions
Hello, Bunnypranav,
Just a reminder that XFD discussions are scheduled to last at least 7 full days. Do not close discussions hours early. I've seen last minute participation change a closure decision so unless a discussion is eligible for a Snow closure, do not close them before the 7 day requirement. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 21:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)