Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Hi Pbritti, thanks for your feedback on my first DYK review! On that, you said to post {{subst:DYKproblem|[Name of article]|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the relevant user's talk page when you review a hook and don't pass it. Given that I've done a review for another DYK and still don't feel fully comfortable approving solo, I wanted to ask if you believe that {{DYKproblem}} would still be the appropriate message to leave, considering that my review not being a pass is entirely because of my own reservations and currently very limited experience, not an issue with the DYK nomination itself. Thank you again for your advice and assistance in helping me get rolling with actually contributing here on enwiki PixDeVl yell talk to me! 22:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PixDeVl: I'd love to respond more fully but I'm busy tonight with some work stuff (grading students' tests!). Will explain more fully ASAP! ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, feel free to take your time (as someone who condemns my own teachers to grading my tests, how they read my handwriting is beyond me, so if you have any people like me in your classes, I wish you the best of luck). PixDeVl yell talk to me! 02:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

I am a fairly inexperienced Wikipedia editor, who has written some articles that I would like to see reviewed and possibly improved by a more experienced user. I'm reaching out to you because I'm somewhat familiar with you from twitter and after reviewing your profile you seem quite competent. I also believe that the articles would be of interest to you. They are Kilmore Carols, Church of San Juan Bautista (Ohkay Owingeh), and Hell Opened to Christians. The first and last articles I especially would like to see improved with regards to formatting: the "Songs of the Cycle" in the first and the "Contents" in the last would probably best be organized as tables; however, I do not know how to do this technically. Any advice about this would be welcome, as well as about all three articles in general.

Do not feel in any rush about reviewing these articles, as I know you must be busy now that we are into the academic year. I just think you might be interested in taking a look at them. I hope, also, that this is not an inappropriate request, but I do think that Wikipedia is best edited collaboratively. Thank you for your time.

Best Regards,

DefeatingLine (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DefeatingLine: Absolutely glad to help! Let me take a look at the relevant articles and I'll try to get back to you before too long! If you notice I haven't replied here again in a few days, feel more than welcome to ping me once more! ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Working Man's Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Pbritti for accumulating at least 10 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Geoffrey Cuming in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
· · ·

Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]