Computer science B‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Time B‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

The redirect 292,277,026,296 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 5 § 292,277,026,296 until a consensus is reached. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 584,554,051,223 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 5 § 584,554,051,223 until a consensus is reached. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 5,391,559,471,918,239,497,011,222,876,596 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 5 § 5,391,559,471,918,239,497,011,222,876,596 until a consensus is reached. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Y10k section is an example of someone taking an April fools joke too seriously. Not only was RFC 2550 released on April 1, 1999, but its content is obviously humorous (unless someone seriously thinks that a program needs to handle all possible dates in the lifetime of the universe and more). In my opinion, this RFC deserves no attention in a serious context. I'm not going to completely remove the section, in case someone can find a source that genuinely speaks of a "Y10k" problem. Nickps (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CodeTalker: I noticed that you reverted my edit in which I added the Wii and Animal Crossing: City Folk year 2036 problems, on the grounds that Reddit and YouTube are not reliable sources. Except that they are pretty much the best sources we can get for this kind of thing. People have discussed on these problems on forums without providing screenshots/photos/videos as proof. Do you think Nintendo is going to openly acknowledge that they have this problem on their console and game? I also can attest to the Wii thing because I have a Wii. Considering that we have an article for the Wii, it seems notable to include. I think we should mention it on the Wii article too. --Grey Clownfish (talk) 02:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the best sources for this information are unreliable, then the information should not be in Wikipedia. That's unfortunate, but all information here must be verifiable. The source does not need to be Nintendo; it can come from a magazine, newspaper or reliable online source that has reported on the problem, like all the other information in this article. Basing the content on your own observations would also not be acceptable, as that would be original research. CodeTalker (talk) 03:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]