Cquan, like everyone is the world, is at least partially ignorant. This is not a personal attack. Nor is it particularly subtle.

I will do no such thing as using tildes (~) in a way contrary to Allah's intent for their use.

-Grover

While I may defer on the subject of the College of William and Mary, a loosely based statement about a conversation you had with your brother doesn't exactly qualify as an reliable source on the subject. IMHO, stating on an institution's article that an institution's membership in an organization is subject to review is not necessary, since such rules would apply to all members and would logically be found on the article about the organization or subsequent sources. I felt it necessary to explore the statement you added per my own logic, to make sure that such information was included in the proper article. However, as I pointed out, the official policies of the AAU do not state anything about periodic review, so I left it at that. If you have an attributable reference stating otherwise, you should consider adding the content to the AAU article and citing it.

A few other things:

• Making personal attacks, however subtle they may be, is not allowed on Wikipedia, so please don't.
• You should sign your edits using ~~~~, as this provides a link to your user page for identification.
• Also, in general, you shouldn't blank your talk page, but that's just a suggestion.

Thanks. -Cquan 02:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. That is inappropriate...amusing, but inappropriate. Also, it clutters my talk page, so I've saved it to read on my own time. -Cquan 04:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]