This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Family and relationships (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. LGBTQ+ studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of same-sex married couples. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140313111323/http://celebrity.yahoo.com/news/celebrity-weddings-brides-wore-colored-dresses-2012-212200273.html to http://celebrity.yahoo.com/news/celebrity-weddings-brides-wore-colored-dresses-2012-212200273.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525095436/http://www.asianweek.com/2008/09/14/wed-me-up-scotty-george-takei-weds/ to http://www.asianweek.com/2008/09/14/wed-me-up-scotty-george-takei-weds/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120411033656/http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2012/01/09/Alan_Cumming_Remarries_Husband/ to http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2012/01/09/Alan_Cumming_Remarries_Husband/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Sources all seem to be correct, and extremely informative. Major concern is the validity of some of the links as they are not peer-reviewed nor academically written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NatalieCampbell (talk • contribs) 18:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They are currently engaged to each other and may be added to the list when and if they marry. Arthur E. Stewart (talk) 00:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This really needs better sourcing, or removal for those that aren't sourced to BLP appropriate sources or have only partial information. What's the basis for inclusion? Star Mississippi 18:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]