Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VitaCraft: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Aagtbdfoua (talk | contribs) |
→[[VitaCraft]]: tenuous connections? |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''Non-notable''' Reads like an advertisement. Sources do not meet criteria of substantial independent work or multiple non-trivial works. <span style="font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; border:none; font-size:10pt; padding:2px; line-height:10pt; width:30em;">—[[User:Ocatecir|<font color="#660099">O</font><font color="#333333">cat</font><font color="#660099">ecir</font>]] <sup><font color="#333399">[[User_talk:Ocatecir|Talk]]</font></sup></span> 12:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC) |
'''Non-notable''' Reads like an advertisement. Sources do not meet criteria of substantial independent work or multiple non-trivial works. <span style="font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; border:none; font-size:10pt; padding:2px; line-height:10pt; width:30em;">—[[User:Ocatecir|<font color="#660099">O</font><font color="#333333">cat</font><font color="#660099">ecir</font>]] <sup><font color="#333399">[[User_talk:Ocatecir|Talk]]</font></sup></span> 12:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''', per nom. - [[User:Aagtbdfoua|Aagtbdfoua]] 02:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''', per nom. - [[User:Aagtbdfoua|Aagtbdfoua]] 02:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment'''. We should get [[User:ChristopherMannMcKay]] involved as originator, and maybe [[User:Pilotguy]], who once deleted [[RFIQin]] (about which I also have concerns). Besides the fact I ''hate'' their misuse of the word [[anhydrous]], I have concerns about the cluster of these three articles. [[VitaCraft Japan]] is being justified by its association through [[Mamoru Imura]] to [[VitaCraft]], US company, which may or may not (?) make/sell [[RFIQin]], which is simply a 'better' (asserted) means for [[Induction cooker|Induction cooking]]. So the justifications are by their connections, with the most notable 'thing' being simply an enhancement (now with [[RFID]]!) of an established technology. But if these articles go away, then should [[Mamoru Imura]] stay? I think they should be considered as a group. (Ouch) [[User:Shenme|Shenme]] 04:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:59, 6 March 2007
Non-notable Reads like an advertisement. Sources do not meet criteria of substantial independent work or multiple non-trivial works. —Ocatecir Talk 12:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. - Aagtbdfoua 02:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. We should get User:ChristopherMannMcKay involved as originator, and maybe User:Pilotguy, who once deleted RFIQin (about which I also have concerns). Besides the fact I hate their misuse of the word anhydrous, I have concerns about the cluster of these three articles. VitaCraft Japan is being justified by its association through Mamoru Imura to VitaCraft, US company, which may or may not (?) make/sell RFIQin, which is simply a 'better' (asserted) means for Induction cooking. So the justifications are by their connections, with the most notable 'thing' being simply an enhancement (now with RFID!) of an established technology. But if these articles go away, then should Mamoru Imura stay? I think they should be considered as a group. (Ouch) Shenme 04:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)