Talk:Century Initiative: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Community Tech bot (talk | contribs) Files used on this page are up for speedy deletion |
Octagon.pinhole (talk | contribs) →Discussion of neutrality in article: new section Tag: New topic |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* [[commons:File:Century-initiative-logo-full.svg|Century-initiative-logo-full.svg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: speedy | 2021-05-12T11:24:10.319111 | Century-initiative-logo-full.svg --> |
* [[commons:File:Century-initiative-logo-full.svg|Century-initiative-logo-full.svg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: speedy | 2021-05-12T11:24:10.319111 | Century-initiative-logo-full.svg --> |
||
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 11:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC) |
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 11:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Discussion of neutrality in article == |
|||
I've been editing this article to remove what I consider non-neutral language and tone. Author @[[User:ScienceMan123|ScienceMan123]] disagrees. Let's discuss a compromise here. [[User:Octagon.pinhole|Octagon.pinhole]] ([[User talk:Octagon.pinhole|talk]]) 14:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:30, 21 August 2022
The Century Initiative and its policies have been discussed by articles from all of Canada's major newspapers and TV stations, meeting the notability requirements for organizations and companies, so I am removing the notability tag. --ScienceMan123 (talk) 12:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Discussion of neutrality in article
I've been editing this article to remove what I consider non-neutral language and tone. Author @ScienceMan123 disagrees. Let's discuss a compromise here. Octagon.pinhole (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)