Past discussions
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Till January 21, 2007 Till February 15, 2007

I've been sticking scrupulously to the high road and I don't appreciate the fact that you're not.

If you want to throw insinuations like "Taoist", "communist" or "agenda" at me, I can come right back with "Indian nationalist".
And I've policed real Han chauvinists on Wikipedia so I have the diffs to prove your accusations false whereas you really, really don't.

As I said before, I didn't want this to become an edit war.
Perhaps I should have made clear that I don't want this to become a flamewar either.
So drop your cheap ad hominem BS.

JFD 23:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did make suggestions. At this point we may as well just let Saposcat have at it, which would allow us the wikibreak you suggested.
JFD 01:17, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm moving the discussion between you and JFD onto the Zen talk page, as it really belongs there for all to see, rather than hidden away on my talk page. Once I've done the move, I'm going to make a few brief comments as time allows. Cheers. —Saposcat 11:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of WP:Sock, by the way ? I hope this is not repeated. _{Freedom skies| talk}  16:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dont threaten me on my talk page. I am aware of the policy, but i dont know how i broke it. Before i created a user name i used to edit under IP 198.7.249.101. After i became IP198 i stopped editing under the IP. The reason i mentioned that i was formerly 198.7.249.101 on my user page was so people could know that those edits belonged to me. IP198 17:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of the policy, but i dont know how i broke it.

Not enough edits were made from this account to explain you being apparently being well versed in WP. Your contributions overlap with another user. I will watch your contributions and you will face appropriate concequenses if you violate any WP Policy. The overlaps have been registered and more will be collected as evidence and produced on appropriate time._{Freedom skies| talk}  17:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

are accusing me of being a sock of fowler&fowler? i suggest you look at the discussion of salwar kameez, you will see that we have different opinions on the matter. Also dont remove neutrality tags(Kashmir Conflict) without a discussion. Just because someone has a different opinion than you does not give you the right to discredit them. as for being well versed with wikipedia, how hard is it? IP198 17:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will take into account the contribs and the pattern you and the user in question share. Socks have been known to "communicate" with each other to gain credibility. The level of expertise you show does not reflect you contribs accurately. Overlaps will be produced on appropriate times. _{Freedom skies| talk}  17:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do have rather high intelligence, so that could explain why i have shown such "expertise". as for me being fowler, i suggest you look at the edits on History of Pakistan. when i was editing under the IP i changed the article to the ancient lands of pakistan, fowler changed it to the ancient lands of modern day Pakistan. also look at salwar kameez have completly different positions regarding the spelling, and national dress. He removed my edits calling them 'nationalistic". Please do not take an apparent grudge against fowler out on me. do not remove my edits by saying WP Sock. if you want to change the article for the betterment of the article go right ahead, but do not accuse me of being a sock it is really insulting. also do not remove the neutrality tag on the Kashmir Conflict without a discussion. I will be reverting the edits you have made. once again do not change my edits unless it is to improve the article, and stop accusing me of being a sock. IP198 17:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very suggestive; speaking things like "I do have high intelligence" and blanking discussion page at the first hint of allegations of unexplained expertise. Having multiple IPs at one's disposal is not uncommon. I'll wait and watch. My opinion, the overlaps will stop and the editing on other topics will continue. The pattern and nature of the edits will be similar though. The initial overlap seems to be good enough for future references though. _{Freedom skies| talk}  18:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i reverted your edits on iqbal, but i forgot that i was logged out. i used this IP 24.91.15.182. Please do not use this to this to block me. Also do not block the IP, as i am at a friends house so it is not my IP. As for balnking my talk page i like my page to be clean, thats the only reason. As for "I do have high intelligence", it was a joke. You were the one praising me for my "expertise" after all. IP198 18:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I won't be using the edits on Iqbal for references on probable future ocassions. _{Freedom skies| talk}  19:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you stop inserting Indian subcontinent on the intro of this page. Afghanistan is not part of the subcontinent so the term is incorrect. Also in Bangladesh and India the salwar is worn mainly by women, while in Afghanistan and Pakistan it is worn by both men and women. IP198 20:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is an informal discussion and a straw poll at Talk:Indo-Aryan migration/chat2007. Your input would be beneficial. --RF 08:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its quite balanced right now, as the mainstream view of the NDF is prominent. Remember that the reader can easily see what the NDF is after reading of their involvement in Marad and the killing of the CPIM activists. There's no need to waste time adding two words which will only lead to edit wars.Bakaman 16:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]