And thanks for keeping the TF2 article clean. :) --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 04:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but the paragraph:

Lucid dreamers regularly describe their dreams as exciting, colourful, and fantastic. Many compare it to a spiritual experience and say that it changed their lives or their perception of the world. Some have even reported lucid dreams that take on a hyperreality, seemingly "more real than real", where all the elements of reality are amplified. Lucid dreams are prodigiously more memorable than other kinds of dreaming, even nightmares, which may be why they are often prescribed as a means of ridding one's self of troubling dreams.

is nothing but weasel words and the claim that "The validity of lucid dreaming as a scientifically verified phenomenon is well-established." is unsourced and does need a citation. Your edit summary in removing my tags was unnecessarily incivil. Please try to stay calm and comment on the content being discussed. Gwernol 00:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the citation for the "validity" claim, that's excellent. Glad we could agree on the paragraph too. Best, Gwernol 00:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - have responded to - well whatever that thing is. I have rolled back your changes - again - you will notice that the set you hasve changed were not mine but an admins! And I have contacted said admin.

It is a pity this could not have been delt with rationally and normally.

I am now off to have a drink - its new years eve here but wish you a hapy new year --Wolfit 20:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfit, I am dealing with this rationally. I started a mediation so it could be fairly decided. You simply edit war and revert all my changes. I don't really care that an admin reverted my changes, that doesn't mean anything... LilDice 20:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For your help on the Opie and Anthony article. Most of the articles sighted on Opie and Anthony's higher ratings don't even exist at those sites anymore. TheWikiTruthisOutThere

Thank you for your suggestion that I should have added real sources. My contribution was intended to provide info on a very popular induction device that is not currently discussed. This would be similar to the other induction devices currently discussed - Nova Dreamer and Lucille. I'm new to adding information to Wikipedia, although I've been using for a couple years. I'm working on several additions to my previous change which will hopefully provide the needed sources and verifiablity. Should I post the new version of my changes directly to the page (in the same way I did previously) or should I first send you the new version of my changes so you can confirm that are now acceptable (and if not possibly give me a couple suggestions on what else I can do to improve)? Bengler 00:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not realize that I reverted to a worse edit. Thanks for fixing it.Mvemkr 02:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits regarding Stern are off a bit. If you want, email me offline to discuss and/or explain? newsyprd@megahits.com.

Discuss on the articles talk page about how they are 'off a bit'. That's what it's for. LilDice 12:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Props on your recent edits to the dream article! V-Man737 01:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on [[:, which you did not on [[:{{{1}}}]]]]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 22:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]