Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NORG, lacks any reliable independent secondary sources. Twitter and Reddit are not acceptable references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iron Front (United States) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Iron Front (United States), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MaitreyaVaruna! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The time allocated for running scripts has expired.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tamayori-hime (mother of Jimmu), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kiki and Sumiyoshi Shrine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kiki (Shinto), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 07:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at History of science instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1st Century in Science and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1st Century in Science, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Astolfo (Fate/stay night), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 07:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can find no source saying he is bisexual, therefore, I have reverted the categories you just added.

Where did you read/see that he is bisexual. Le Marteau (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I read it from a 2014 interview, that I turned out to have misunderstood. He actually said he wanted to be bisexual and had sex with men in the past MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 01:16, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From what I've gathered, he went around to various gay bars with a film crew and found one guy he masturbated in a bathroom. That is not "men". Le Marteau (talk) 02:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I say this only because it is important that we be careful about discussing living people. Misstatements about them, particularly about sensitive issues such as sexuality, must be either removed or corrected anywhere it appears on the encyclopedia, even on talk pages. Peace out. Le Marteau (talk) 02:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not demonstrate sufficient notability for a standalone article based on sources cited in the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Astolfo (Fate/stay night) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Astolfo (Fate/stay night), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure the article supports adding this category. At least 2 articles are about South Korean cults with no mention of China.Slywriter (talk) 19:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC) @Slywriter: Will do. This is a formal list by the Chinese government so there will be proper citations for this, at least on the Chinese Wikipedia articles from I categorized the groups from (with the exceptions of Heterodox teachings (Chinese law) and Murder of Wu Shuoyan which are not groups themselves but strongly linked to it) MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 19:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The two articles I reverted make no mention of any members or activities in China, so unless sections are added about their activities in China and are sourced to WP:SECONDARY reliable sources, it is unlikely the Chinese government list justifies the category. Also, remember Chinese Wikipedia and English Wikipedia are different projects with different guidelines. Slywriter (talk) 19:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and no issue with the other two mentioned, they discuss China.Slywriter (talk) 19:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Slywriter: can you link those two articles so I can look over them? MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 19:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shincheonji Church of Jesus and Dami Mission Slywriter (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MaitreyaVaruna! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is there a way to follow specific Wikipedia projects, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MaitreyaVaruna:

I noticed that you re-moved various articles back to the mainspace, after I'd moved them to draftspace just a few days ago. I also notice that, while you appear to be editing these pages, you haven't yet corrected the biggest issues with them -- chunks of text still in Japanese, badly machine-translated text that isn't grammatical, lack of sourcing, various things listed as "references" when they appear to be more "annotations".

Considering the substantial issues with these pages, I recommend that they be moved back to draftspace until the text can be rendered in grammatical and meaningful English, and appropriate sources can be added (even if that's a matter of translating the bibliographic info for Japanese sources and translating the relevant source text sections).

Also pinging @Liz: since she appears to be much more knowledgeable about drafts and moves than I am.

The articles in question:

• History of Shinto
• Yamatai Kyushu Theory
• Yamatai Honshu Theory
• Makimuku ruins

It looks like you've made the most progress with the Makimuku ruins page. However, this still has numerous issues.

• "Makimukyamata" is not a Japanese term. The text links through to ja:Makimukyamata River, but the Japanese Wikipedia does not have any article by that title, nor by any homophonic title in Japanese script.
• There are still strange machine-translation artifacts littered through the page. Examples include:

The name of the Archaeological site comes from the village of Makimuku in the former Isogi-gun, and the village name "Makimuku" was taken from the "Makimuku Tamaki Palace" of Suinin and the "Makimuku Hijiro Palace" of Emperor Keikō's "Tamaki Palace" and Emperor Hishiro Palace of Keikō,

The above is the entirety of the first paragraph in the #Location and site outline section.

Note that excavation, who was in charge of the Ishino Hironobu, assigned the calendar years 180 to 210 for "Garment 1".

This is the last sentence of the third paragraph in that same #Location and site outline section. Note that the links go through to the Japanese Wikipedia: one to the non-existent article at ja:excavation, and two to irrelevant articles at ja:180 and ja:210, which discuss the numbers themselves.

The three tumuli are surrounded by the Garoshi Katsuyama tumulus (top), the Yatsuka tumulus (bottom left) and the Ishizuka tumulus (bottom right), and the Garoshi Elementary School is located between them.

This is a caption for one of the pictures. The problem here is that the tumuli are not surrounded by anything in the picture, and instead they surround the elementary school.

• Sourcing is inadequate.
• Strange formatting that renders the meaning unclear.

On the map of the site, the area of the site is centered on JR Makimuki Station and stretches about 2km from east to west and about 1.5km from north to south, forming an oval shape with an area of 3km2 (3 million m2).

Emphasis mine. Clearer phrasing might be "three square kilometers", for instance.

• Chunks of text still in Japanese.

In addition to the References at the bottom, there's also the 「搬入土器の出身地割合」 table in the #Main excavated artifacts section.

MaitreyaVaruna, I look forward to your thoughts. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 01:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Eirikr: Thank you for this input. I feel with it I managed to make substantial improvements on these articles, and their sourcing. The Exception being History of Shinto because it is quite long and has a complex set of references MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 06:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MaitreyaVaruna: Thanks for the reply. That makes sense, and I am reassured that someone is actively working on these. I hope the above provides useful feedback on further improvements. Kind regards, ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 23:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coming late to this productive discussion. I am usually moving inadequately sourced or incomplete articles to Draft space than rather than improving content. I am not a content creator but it's nice to see MaitreyaVaruna work on improving articles. All I can really add is that editors often move pages into Draft space when there is a possibility that they could be tagged for speedy deletion. New page patrollers are very efficient in evaluating new pages and tagging for deletion those that meet speedy deletion criteria. Although pages in Draft space can still be tagged for speedy deletion (most often advertising or promotional content), it's considered a "safe space" for articles to be improved upon so that is often the reason why articles that could be deleted are moved to this name space. It's rarely a comment on the substance or subject (or its notability) of an article but after an evaluation of the present condition of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yamatai Kyushu Theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kawachi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your edit because the list of descendants is basically a copy of things at List of emperors of Japan#Gallery. These early emperors are also mythical, and the tree showing status based on the Kiki reflects that. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:42, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MaitreyaVaruna! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Himetataraisuzu-hime, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently working on improving Kyushu dynasty theory and Draft:Yamato Kingship and Yamatai Kyushu Theory and Yamatai Honshu Theory MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 19:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shinshi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shinshi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Continues to fail notability. This article would quickly be deleted if sent to AfD and information on the character is better off placed in List of Fate/Apocrypha characters instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Astolfo (Fate/Apocrypha character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Astolfo (Fate/Apocrypha character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Akihito into Emperor Taishō. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek: How may I do that for edits I previously did but forgot to include in the edit summary? MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just make a dummy edit, or you can fix a minor error in the page like I did here. Thanks for your understanding and willingness! Or, feel free to just tell me where you previously copied material and I'd be happy to take care of it. DanCherek (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aiko,_Princess_Toshi&oldid=1070847193 here from her father, and also the Japanese Wikipedia article on her mother. Here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emperor_Meiji&oldid=1070846904 from Hirohito, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Takahito,_Prince_Mikasa&oldid=1070845311 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nobuhito,_Prince_Takamatsu&oldid=1070845266 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yasuhito,_Prince_Chichibu&oldid=1070845155 all three of them from Emperor Taisho MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 16:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All done! Thanks. DanCherek (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Theology Sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:20, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miko clothing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bow and Ladle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs sourcing to establish how this is notable, as well as improvements to the claims. Claims also need to be attributed. For example, when writing "some say" the question is who is saying this? Is anyone actually saying this? If so, then what are their qualifications? Keep in mind that we can only summarize what has been explicitly stated in reliable sources, preferably academic and scholarly sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shinto mirror and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shinto mirror, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Adding this to your profile MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 05:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 05:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: No reason I just love trouting MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kotobank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotobank until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Salidou, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 00:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Turkic creation myth. Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnamese refugee detention centres in Hong Kong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Styyx was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No signs of significant coverage and meeting the general notability guideline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alperen Tolgahan İme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alperen Tolgahan İme, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 09:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Adolf Hitler Uunona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolf Uunona. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 19:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know it was deleted before. I thought the page was just conspicuously absent in English. The fact basically every other language has it means it probably should be kept though MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just because other projects have it is meaningless. The standard of notability on English Wikipedia is not a global policy. CUPIDICAE💕 19:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should have seen on the page before you created it that the article had been deleted before multiple times. It is now protected from being recreated. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Turkic creation myth. Thanks! Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miko (anime and manga) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miko (anime and manga) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Goszei (talk) 07:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sect Shinto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 23:26, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sect Shinto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 23:27, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@IAmChaos: I have no clue what happened but that redirect was supposed to go to where it is now. MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 23:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yup! As soon as I tagged it I got a watchlist email that you were changing the page, and I've now removed the tag. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 23:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Religious organizations disestablished in 1999 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rollidan was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hikoyai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hikoyai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rollidan (talk) 07:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for having proposed an improvement for the name of my category.--Geysirhead (talk) 07:46, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Geysirhead: do you know what's going on with the move of Category:Rule by a subset of population because it doesn't seem to have happened yet. There's a bot that will move them to Category:Merocracy right? MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 05:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is discussion about the word Merocracy in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 February 19#Category:Merocracy --Geysirhead (talk) 17:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://manga.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page

No one will try to delete your work there. Dream Focus 08:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dream Focus: What article are you talking about? MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Mikos in anime and manga is now up for deletion. Dream Focus 21:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dream Focus: thank you. I added it here https://manga.fandom.com/wiki/Mikos_in_anime_and_manga is that wiki essentially a wiki made by Wikipedians to preserve anime and manga Wikipedia pages that would otherwise be deleted? It feels more academic than the typical wikia wiki MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 22:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well hard to know what to put on the main page. Other wikias have just one thing they are dedicated to, so you can just link to characters, episodes, issues, etc. There were a lot of manga and anime articles being delete almost daily back in 2010 when I started exporting them to there. Dream Focus 23:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Serial Number 54129 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There are other issues too. The prose accepts the existence of genies, etc., in Wikipedia's voice; it reads more as an essay than an encyclopedia entry; and not only does it rely on insufficient sources, it has large amounts (I.e., the majority) of uncited text.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shinko-shiki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shinko-shiki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SN54129 14:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There are not enough references to demonstrate that this topic is notable and that the story section isn't simply made up by the editor. Please look more widely for sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Turkic creation myth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Turkic creation myth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 11:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No substantive change since draftification. As Onel5969 said, you need more sources. I can't find most of the content of the Overview section in your two references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shukubo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shukubo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 16:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dick pic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social dominance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MaitreyaVaruna! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Changing name of image I created, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Religion and alcohol. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is a request to spin off an article. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article, unless the draft satisfies a special notability guide. If the draft satisfies a special notability guide, please identify the notability criterion with a reliable source. This does not mean that the draft should be spun off, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun off. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article, [[Talk:{{{1}}}]]. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article and does not satisfy a special notability guide, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Omiki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Omiki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Yamai national theory, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]