Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Impact Wrestling personnel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NXT Takeover 36.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:

1. The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
2. Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
3. Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
4. Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
5. Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
6. BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
7. Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
8. Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

• The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
• Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
• Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
• Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
• The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
• The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
• Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
• Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I noticed you edit a lot of Cleveland-related articles and was hoping you might be able to help me out with something related to one of the Cleveland Browns players.

The J._C._Tretter article is titled incorrectly. The name of the article should be "JC Tretter" without the two periods, as that is how he formats his name. For reference, https://www.clevelandbrowns.com/team/players-roster/jc-tretter/ lists his name correctly as simply "JC Tretter"

Would you be able to help correct the title of that article, by chance? I would do it myself, but I work with the NFLPA and thus have a conflict of interest.

Thanks, JeffreyArthurVA (talk) 17:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saw that you made the correction. Thanks a lot! JeffreyArthurVA (talk) 20:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the article on JC Tretter does not include a subsection on his time as NFLPA President, so I wrote up a draft at User:JeffreyArthurVA/Sandbox11. Would you mind taking a glimpse at this draft and, if it looks good to you, add it to the JC Tretter article at the end of the JC_Tretter#Professional_career section? Have a good day, -JeffreyArthurVA (talk) 21:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JeffreyArthurVA I saw your write up. The one thing I can see an issue with (not necessarily by me, but others) is WP:Weight. It could be interpreted as putting too much emphasis on that one aspect of his career. Trim a little fat and make it look a little less "rah-rah". I'll take a look again, and we'll go from there. Vjmlhds 23:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vjmlhds Your feedback makes sense and I appreciate it. I trimmed the fat and the rah-rah (and removed the quote from ESPN) to be more matter-of-fact and in proportion to the rest of the article. How does the updated version at User:JeffreyArthurVA/Sandbox11 look to you? Cheers, -JeffreyArthurVA (talk) 20:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JeffreyArthurVA I'd say good enough to be included in the article. Vjmlhds 21:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vjmlhds Thanks. One last question -- could you delete the last sentence of the "Cleveland Browns" section of this JC Tretter article? Now that the "NFLPA President" section exists below it, that last sentence in the Browns section is now duplicative. Have a good one --JeffreyArthurVA (talk) 22:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's good to see someone actually trying to help with the Impact roster instead of just removing things to fuel their egos. I appreciate it. SkylerLovefist (talk) 18:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VJ, as Adicted said, WInc is not a reliable source. Please, use a reliable source for the real name. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 08:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kris Statlander, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 01:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KyleJoan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The View (talk show), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 05:12, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daytime television in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've received numerous notices about violating the original research policy, which you did once again when you added that Ana Navarro is a main fill-in for the four main hosts. Would you like to stop or be taken to ANI again? KyleJoan^talk 15:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]