Jonathan King was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 11, 2009 Good article nominee Listed June 19, 2009 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Biography: Musicians C‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance). Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. BBC C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary) Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article. British crime (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject British crime, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Crime and Criminal Biography C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. London C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Pop music C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why arent we including this in the opening sentence? Xiamatt (talk) 18:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because he was famous, for very different reasons, long before he was convicted of anything. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but now that he is convicted dont you think it is kinda notable? Xiamatt (talk) 18:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly notable. That's why the lead section has a whole paragraph on it, with five sources. I guess the lead section is trying to maintain a chronological flow. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been discussed before and it is about emphasis. As with Rolf Harris and Gary Glitter, King was famous for many years in the pop music industry before the sex offence convictions.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 18:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have just seen the documentary on Who Let The Dogs Out - added a link and mention. https://variety.com/2019/film/news/who-let-dogs-out-documentary-director-interview-1203159482/ 86.140.208.157 (talk) 06:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"He [King] features heavily in the award winning documentary about the song", says one of the edits. Yes, but the Variety source doesn't mention King by name at all, so it cannot be verified from the source.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 06:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just logged onto the page after hearing a track of King's on radio. Was astonished by how many hits he had. Then searched for some of the movies. Again, incredible view counts for almost every one. Is Wiki censored? And if so, by whom? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.80.66.57 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia (note name) is edited by volunteers and a lot of people don't seem to understand that this means what they think might be censorship is just the volunteers priorities, knowledge or the information they have time to find sources for. If you know of sourced information that should go in, either edit the article or suggest it on the talk page. Signatures here are effected by typing four tildes (4x~) by the way. Britmax (talk) 14:00, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody bothers with the washed-up ex-con any more. We're all busy editing Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos. Did someone say lukewarm? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:24, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]