Biography: Politics and Government Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

India: Gujarat / Politics Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance). This article was last assessed in June 2012. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

The facts that form the basis of the mediastorm surrounding Mohan Delkar's are encyclopaedic and many people will look to wikipedia in response to reading worrying media stories for unbiased verity.Veej (talk) 15:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Independent contrib recently removed the 2019 Daman Indigenous Land Clearing Protests section from Praful Khoda Patel page stating "Removing Contentious material about living persons which is unsourced". You may have done this in error as there were multiple sources. Also, it's immaterial whether the text was contentious. Rather it must be relevant and encyclopaedic which it certainly is. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on User talk:Veej Veej (talk) 12:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As this person is now accused in another controversy regarding communally motivated orders in the union territory area, this page is getting bombarded with spam edits. So better lock this to logged in users for now. Abvayad (talk) 18:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Abvayad Am3de594 (talk) 07:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection is required ChandlerMinh (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thasleem ali (talk) 12:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 12:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]