This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. This article is supported by the politics and government work group. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Georgia (U.S. state): Atlanta Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Atlanta task force. Atlanta task force To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Rate Atlanta related articles from Unassessed Atlanta articles and Category:Unknown-importance Atlanta articles. Citing sources : Unreferenced Atlanta articles Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Infobox : Atlanta articles without infoboxes Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Atlanta Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Atlanta Stubs : Work on stubs in Category:Atlanta stubs. Other : * Help out with articles placed in Category:Atlanta articles needing attention Add {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)|class=|importance=|atlanta=|atlanta-importance=}} project banner to Atlanta-related articles to talk pages and assess. Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality. Get Atlanta into Featured article status. Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic. WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)... Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles. Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category. Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state) Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state) Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs. Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner. Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. U.S. Congress This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

The article says that he opposes defunding the police, but in his interview he said that he supports defunding the police. [1] The article needs to be corrected. Yurivict (talk) 02:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't say that. This source, which is a small audio clip of a radio interview Ossoff gave, says he thinks "funding needs to be on the line" but the context is unclear, and it's unclear what "funding needs to be on the line" means. Marquardtika (talk) 03:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the difference? "funding needs to be on the line" means that he is for defunding. Yurivict (talk) 04:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's entirely without context. What does "funding needs to be on the line" mean? And the source is insufficient. We have Axios from a week ago saying "Answering a series of questions about his views on specific policies pushed by progressives, Ossoff said he does not support the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, expanding the Supreme Court, defunding police or abolishing ICE." Marquardtika (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is something off-putting and unnatural about the current one (to the point that it doesn't resemble how he looks normally). If I recall correctly, the previous one wasn't particularly good either. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 03:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Snooganssnoogans: hi. take a look at the photos on Flickr of him that we could use (there are some CC videos on YouTube but their search filter for licensing seems to be completely non-functional) -- they're all from one event. not many good ones. switched the current one in from this horrible one but maybe one of the others is better. DemonDays64 (talk) 01:43, 4 December 2020 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

@DemonDays64: Could we replace it with this? This was proposed earlier on this page, but there was apparently a copyright dispute at the time. The file seems to be CC and it looks like the speedy deletion was cancelled. The video it was pulled from looks to be marked as Creative Commons. Do you figure we can use it now? Chillabit (talk) 21:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Snooganssnoogans, DemonDays64, and Chillabit: Reverted, per WP:BRD. In my opinion, the above is quite an awkward picture. While the photo's resolution is high-quality, the facial expression isn't great and the "better lighting" isn't any better; ...the photo especially clashes when next to his opponent's picture on the 2020–21 United States Senate election in Georgia page. Paintspot Infez (talk) 00:15, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it's subjective, I don't mind the rollback. I uploaded this to the Wikimedia Commons if that'd be better. It's from a more recent interview. EDIT: I guess you may want a ping. @Paintspot: Chillabit (talk) 03:52, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Might actually be a better photo! @Snooganssnoogans and DemonDays64: what do you think? Paintspot Infez (talk) 01:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Paintspot: Ok, I went ahead and changed it to File:Jon_Ossoff_on_Showtime.png. DarthFlappy 23:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the image to what DarthFlappy has changed it to until his senate office releases his official portrait. I don’t want there to be a pointless edit war to change his photo to another below average photo of him with just a few days until he is sworn into office. ~ Fluffy89502 (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the photo on the official Senate website is significantly better. At this point, the Senate still hasn't released an official portrait, but this photo should be updated to be at least in line with the one on his Senate page that his campaign has provided. We can update it again later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakshya97 (talk • contribs) 22:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See many other comments on this talk page, such as the rather frustrated #Stop changing the photo to the one from the Senate website, which explain that that photo is not freely licensed and so can't be used. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but aren't there any better free photos we would be open to changing this to where the lighting is superior? Lakshya97 (talk) 22:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to peruse what we've got in commons:Category:Jon Ossoff and suggest a change if you'd like. Though I'd recommend starting a new discussion if you do so, to garner more engagement—you're currently adding to a discussion that hasn't been active in several months. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is typically included in Wikipedia biographies in the early life section more often than personal life where it is appearing on this page. RichardBond (talk) 23:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A high-quality reference is required per WP:BLP. And please use an edit summary when you edit. --Hipal (talk) 02:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding TV appearances of a politician to his "filmography" doesn't make sense for me. BasileusAutokratorPL (talk) 00:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He is a filmmaker in his real-life job --FideKoeln (talk) 04:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't mention TV appearances of pure filmmakers either (I mean the last 2 entries, that is Deadline: White House and New Day). BasileusAutokratorPL (talk) 19:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can/should these sections be merged? I believe there's an overlap, as his "Personal" section covers who his parents are, which would generally go under "Early". The only "Personal" fact that'd warrant not going under "Early" is his marriage. -- Tytrox (talk) 08:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been done. -- Tytrox (talk) 11:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the UK, a Master of Science degree is abbreviated to a MSc rather than MS. Should the education field in his biobox use MSc given this was awarded by a UK university? Drerac (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On the 9th line (office), "Georgia" links to a disambiguation page. It should link to Georgia, not Georgia. BazingaFountain42 (talk) 14:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the U.S. Senate section, Results subsection it says that Ossoff declared victory on Jan. 6, 2020. That should be Jan. 6, 2021. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:CD40:3DB0:F4E6:BC7C:651B:EAA1 (talk) 15:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If he wins, an official source will be forthcoming, but is there anything better than what we have at present? AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 15:31, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Ossoff as Senator- elect, some changes with the title need to be implemented. Pavelmarin2006 (talk) 21:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Article already says he is senator elect. Please be specific about what changes you are asking for. RudolfRed (talk) 00:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems this sentence was not finished? "Members of the House are only required to live in the state they represent, but it" 63.237.165.130 (talk) 03:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the "but it". – Muboshgu (talk) 04:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a '.' at the end :) 63.237.165.130 (talk) 04:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, good eye. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Assuming Warnock is not sworn in on an earlier day than Ossoff, Ossoff will become Georgia's senior senator over Warnock by virtue of his last name preceding Warnock's alphabetically.[15]"

• this is not actually correct. Since Ossoff was elected to a full six-year term, he will become the Senior Senator from Georgia, and Warnock will be the Junior.

"Of the two Senators from a State serving at the same time, the one who was elected first--or if both were elected at the same time, the one elected for a full term--is referred to as the "senior" Senator from that State. The other is referred to as the "junior" Senator."

Source: https://archives-democrats-rules.house.gov/archives/lph-congress.htm#:~:text=Of%20the%20two%20Senators%20from,as%20the%20%22junior%22%20Senator.

I request to change it to (something like): "Upon swearing-in, Ossoff will assume the title of Senior United States Senator from Georgia, as he was elected to a full six-year term in the 2021 Georgia Senate Runoff." Crsbcn (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Seagull123 Φ 22:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever changed the seniority protocol to say "that it runs alphabetically." Please stop. Alphabetical order does not determine seniority in the United States Senate of two candidates elected to the Senate in the same election cycle, and the previous article used as the source is not factual.

Per official Congressional rules:

"Of the two Senators from a State serving at the same time, the one who was elected first--or if both were elected at the same time, the one elected for a full term--is referred to as the "senior" Senator from that State. The other is referred to as the "junior" Senator.

This is taken from the official House Rules on the house.gov website. Source: CRS Guide to Legislative process in the House — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crsbcn (talk • contribs) 01:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't there be the (rare?) case of electing both senators to unexpired terms? In this case, however, Ossoff was running for full term, and he has won that minus 17 days. Notice that the Senate is divided as equally as possible into 3 groups, and for each state, the 2 senators are in different groups. Carlm0404 (talk) 07:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the recent edit changing the reason for Ossoff being senior to Warnock from alphabetical by last name to full term/unexpired term citing the House Rules Committee's website as the source, I could find nothing on either the House Rules Committee's website or Senate Rules Committee's website to support that. On top of that, even though something has been found on a US House website in support of that claim, that is not how the American system of government works because that is not how the British system of government works. In the British system of government, on which the American system of government is modeled, the rules of each chamber of the legislature are binding only on that chamber. Therefore even though the cited source for full term/unexpired term rather than alphabetical by last name is "labeled" CRS (Congressional Research Service), it CANNOT be used for articles relating to the US Senate and the edit that stated thusly MUST be changed back under Wikipedia:V, Wikipedia:NPOV, and Wikipedia:NOR --Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 20:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This RfC should be closed as it is premature. There isn't a difficult to resolve debate on this topic. There's one editor who changed some content and was reverted with sound reasoning. Jdphenix (talk) 14:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Summoned by bot) (edit conflict) Why is this an RfC? It doesn't look like it's been discussed yet? For most article disputes, RfCs are useful after normal talk page discussion fails to find a resolution or when outside opinions are needed. They should also be framed neutrally rather than argue for a particular position. See WP:RFC. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Bigpoliticsfan, please see WP:RFCBEFORE. This does not mean that you cannot continue discussing the matter, however. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of edits, what's up with all these photo bombs? 146.115.139.82 (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the IP may be asking why there seems to be lots of requests asking to add an official Senate portrait. It looks to me like most of them are from one editor which may be the reason. Nil Einne (talk) 06:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this clearly isn't fit for an RfC yet. Also, I don't understand the User:Bigpoliticsfan's point in any real way. Why would a CRS document, which specifically refers to the US Senate, somehow not apply to the US Senate? The OP's point about the House and Senate rules being separate and only binding on the specific house they originate from may be relevant if this was a document that described the rules of the House only but it's not. This is some sort of general guide which refers to the rules in both bodies of Congress. The fact it's on some House website doesn't change any of this. In fact, as the OP noted, it seems to have been prepared by the Congressional Research Service, which means the body preparing it was neither the House nor the Senate but a body working to support the entire US Congress, i.e. including the Senate, so .So, I don't understand why they even refer to the House it was the since it is weirdly the Congress wide/Senate+House the CRS they seemed take issue with in their response, not it the document being on the House website. Personally I'd greatly prefer better secondary source or two, especially one that actually refers to Ossoff. Nil Einne (talk) 06:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 11:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

agreed. this is a misinterpretation of policy and of the cited sources. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 06:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article currently states to not add an IPA directly after Ossoff's last name ("It's pronounced exactly how it's spelled, no need for IPA") but there are multiple ways to say his last name (for example, the "O" at the beginning of his last name could be pronounced as long or short). I propose that IPA should be added. -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. It was originally there, but was removed by one editor. There's many ways it could be mispronounced. A reader could easily assume it's pronounced "OH-soff" or "OSS-iff" instead of the correct "OSS-off". Reverted back. Paintspot Infez (talk) 23:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't he a junior senator not senior? Chloe0303 (talk) 20:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No — he was elected to a full six year term, which ends in January 2027. Warnock was elected to complete the senate term of Johnny Isakson, which ends in January 2023. By length of elected service Ossoff will be the Senior.

Also, neither of them have even been sworn in yet. Crsbcn (talk) 21:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lou22929282727272 (talk) 00:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Official senate photo

The official photo will be added once it is available. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lou22929282727272 (talk) 04:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Official portrait https://www.senate.gov/general/resources/graphic/medium/ossoff-jon.png

 Done Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 05:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Undone: This request has been undone. This image looks to be a copyvio on commons actually, sorry. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 05:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like since Jon Ossoff is now a senator, the picture should be replaced with the picture on the senate.gov website. The current picture makes him just look like an advocate, not a politician. Ltothel (talk) 05:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC) @Ltothel:  Not done the licensing on that is clearly invalid and it will be deleted. There will be a much better free image somewhat soon. DemonDays64 (talk) 05:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lou22929282727272 (talk) 05:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Official portrait

 Not done: Please stop spamming your edit request. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 05:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

74.108.223.90 (talk) 05:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add official portrait from senate website https://www.senate.gov/senators/117thCongress/ossoff-jon.htm

 Not done: Please do not continue posting this edit request. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 05:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a sentence in this bio that reads: "Women's fashion magazines such as Vogue have described Ossoff as physically attractive. Vogue in particular compared it to "[a] grown-up Timothée Chalamet"." That should be "...Vogue in particular compared HIM to..." 199.185.130.170 (talk) 05:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 05:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It (File:Senator Jon Ossoff.png/File:Jon Ossoff Senate photo.jpg) is a copyvio that will be deleted shortly. DemonDays64 (talk) 23:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DemonDays64: The photo keeps being changed, mostly by IPs at this point. Is page protection an option? Lennart97 (talk) 13:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lennart97: good idea, maybe try to get it at WP:RPP please. DemonDays64 (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

@DemonDays64: Request submitted, let's see what happens. Lennart97 (talk) 16:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for two weeks. Lennart97 (talk) 09:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm quite certain that this sentence doesn't make sense: one of a handful of federal elections surrounding the 2018 wave election in which the Democrat underperformed Hillary Clinton. Who underperformed... what? What does Hillary Clinton have to do with it? I don't understand, and none of this is mentioned in the main body of the article.
• Ossoff being the first Jewish senator from Georgia is mentioned twice in the lead: first ...as well as the first Jewish member of the Senate from Georgia... and shortly after ...and the first Jewish senator from the state. I'm not sure which of the two mentions to keep and which to remove.

Lennart97 (talk) 00:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I've taken care of it myself by removing the underperformed Hillary Clinton sentence and the first of the duplicate first Jewish senator sentences. Still curious what Hillary Clinton was supposed to have to do with anything, though. Lennart97 (talk) 13:53, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The text was insert by User:Bernspeed here, you could ask them if you're dying to know. Nil Einne (talk) 15:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

74.108.223.90 (talk) 03:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Official photo

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Bestagon (talk) 04:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is he known as Jonathan, Thomas, or Jon? We should say (known as Jon Ossoff) because we this was done elsewhere. Bernspeed (talk) 15:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bernspeed Jon Ossoff is this person's WP:COMMONNAME. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 08:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• 2017 (67) Jon Ossoff FOR CONGRESS (34502915333).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change Senator Ossoff's picture to his official Senate portrait. That is all LeSoleilRoiUSA (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: And what exactly is the file name of this official portrait as updated either here or to commons? RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:31, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see an official Senate portrait at Commons. I did find an image holding itself out as the official portrait, but a quick search shows that the image isn't official. —C.Fred (talk) 18:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The portrait (seen here) has been repeatedly uploaded and deleted because it is not freely licensed. We can't use it. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I found this file just now, and while he's wearing a mask in it, there is much better lighting. Should it be switched? For what it's worth, he has I guess been seen by way more people wearing a mask, as for essentially the whole 2020 campaign masks were and the whole time since he was elected have been, of course, worn by people everywhere and him with as far as I know no exceptions. DemonDays64 (talk) 02:08, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the photo where his entire face is visible should be retained as the lead photo, despite the poorer lighting. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How about this photo? It's the one from the Congressional Biographical Directory, so I can't see that there any copyright issues with it.

Billmckern (talk) 22:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is a good one. Also general precedent for politicians is to use their political photo. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Emir of Wikipedia, Billmckern, and GorillaWarfare: if there are no objections, I'll crop that photo and use it (the current cropping is wider than we tend to use). Elli (talk | contribs) 00:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK then. Billmckern (talk) 02:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, referencing the above discussion, has anyone made the change that swaps the current photo out with this official photo? If not, can we swap the photo in? I don't mind doing it myself, but wanted to check to see if people are on board with updating it. There shouldn't be any copyright issues here, I think. Lakshya97 (talk) 21:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]