(credit to EEng)

Casting of ass

Persians

19:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, I Like the Stock, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 09:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, I Like The Stock, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 09:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bradford Island you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bradford Island you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bradford Island for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

No, it will start in Cadada and end in Russia. (see animation below) But the rest is correct. =) --Brateevsky ^{(talk to me)} 09:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Brateevsky: Oh no. I will have to fix this later. Thanks for pointing it out!!!!!!! jp×g 20:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm the person who uses the IP that edited the Censor bars page. I'd like to clarify that the edits made to said page were not me, as my IP address is shared. I don't know who it was, but I'm actually using a school computer, and I don't know if that's a variable in the equation. Anyway, it wasn't me.

Hi, then create an account. Firestar464 (talk) 03:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @MaxPlaysGames certainly appears to have an account, and just hasn't gotten the hang of comment-signing yet. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 03:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MaxPlaysGames: It is what it is. That kind of thing happens all the time, and it's not really a big deal. It isn't held against you if somebody from your school/library/ISP vandalizes articles -- I wish you well in editing! jp×g 06:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bradford Island you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bradford Island for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

grats dude Vaticidalprophet (talk) 08:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Mount Madi-ac, I have reverted your tag (alongside my CSD tag) and draftified the article instead. In this example, I changed the criteria from A3 to A1. Guess what? Iridescent called this inappropriate, and in later declines, they call this mistagging. And regarding the draftification, I have draftified the rest of their articles and removed G5 tags, as they are unfortunately improper and could have been reverted instead of getting what I want. CSD criteria is very strict and I, unfortunately, had to force WP:AGF and draftify all of their articles because of this. However you are right to report them to the ANI - if they don't stop creating articles in the mainspace, then they have to be blocked indefinitely. MarioJump83! 06:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An A1 is absolutely an inappropriate tag here, for the record, and it'd take a fairly deletionist admin to delete it under A3 as well. A1 is an empty page, while A3 would be something like "a river" in full with no rough indication of where it might even be. Did Iri decline the G5s or did you pre-emptively do so? Those are all entirely separate criteria. (That said, G5 is inappropriate if there's no indication it's actually circumventing a block/ban.) Vaticidalprophet (talk) 06:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They declined them. MarioJump83! 06:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I have seen that you did a lot of work on the article DALL-E. I must say, you really expanded that article a lot since I last saw it. ETI 15TrSF (Chat Box) 02:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JPxG. I have reverted (here) your rollback of some careful editing to the Neuroticism page. Maybe your attention was raised by the blanking of an inappropriate/OT section[9]? (I do understand that this was a gf mistake :-) But please note - in retrospect at least - that the edit summaries I left explained the rationale for the various changes (including a link to a pertinent talk-page thread). While I am not familiar with the details of rollback, my general understanding is that WP:ROLLBACKUSE is based on the risk of overhasty reversions, such as this one. Best wishes, 86.186.120.141 (talk) 11:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding: I've just seen this, and frankly am losing my patience. What POV? You seem to be using rollback coupled with a warning template to dispute content. OK, I understand that it's gf... but please reflect on these concerns. And if you still have concerns of your own regarding the gf-status of those edits to a psychology page, you might like to contact User:Markworthen, an experienced PSY editor (and I will happily stand corrected on any concerns regarding content / npov :-). 86.186.120.141 (talk) 11:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@86.186.120.141: When I got up and read this on my phone, the diff looked wrong, so I am now looking at it on my computer, and the diff still looks wrong. I installed a bunch of scripts yesterday, which I think caused me to do something very stupid: what seems to have happened here was that I literally read the diff backwards and thought that you were changing In the study of psychology [...] to One of the Big Five [...], which would have been a terrible edit ruining a perfectly neutral sentence to POV-pushing a psychometric model (when in reality you were removing the garbage). For this, I apologize. The removal of the section still vexes me, but given that the rest of your edits were of such high quality, I will AGF on it. Have a good one! jp×g 18:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that JPxG. Obviously, anyone can make a mistake, and we humans are all intrinsically error-prone. But regarding the appropriate use of rollback (ie, per WP:ROLLBACKUSE) please bear in mind that this *might* have been the initial interaction of a potential new WP editor... you can understand where I'm coming from on this.

RE your concern about the section deletion, if you can find some appropriate mention in the paywalled cited source of the actual subject of the page (neuroticism), then maybe we could discuss. As it was, it appeared to me to be, at best, conceptual *prehistory* (per Eysenck perhaps?), and apparently (unless framed quite differently, with appropriately weighting and sourcing) OT/pov. Bst, 86.186.120.141 (talk) 20:27, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]