New Shoreham (UK Parliament constituency)
New Shoreham | |
---|---|
Former borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
County | Sussex (now West Sussex) |
Major settlements | Shoreham-by-Sea |
1295–1885 | |
Seats | Two |
Replaced by | Lewes |
New Shoreham, sometimes simply called Shoreham, was a parliamentary borough centred on the town of Shoreham-by-Sea in what is now West Sussex. It returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of England from 1295 to 1707, then to the House of Commons of Great Britain until 1800, and finally to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 until it was abolished by the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885, with effect from the 1885 general election.
A modern constituency called Shoreham existed from 1974 to 1997.
Boundaries, franchise and boundary changes
New Shoreham is a part of Shoreham-by-Sea, located around its port. The borough, in 1800, had about 1,000 electors. The qualification for the vote before 1832, unusually for a borough, was the possession of a 40 shilling freehold which was the normal franchise for a county constituency.
The explanation for the franchise qualification was the result of a disputed by-election in 1770. At that time all the electors qualified by paying scot and lot, a local property tax. Stooks Smith provides two notes on what happened, following a result in which Thomas Rumbold received 87 votes and John Purling had 37 votes (a third candidate, William James, received 4 votes).
The Returning Officer on the ground that nearly all the 87 were bribed declared Mr. Purling elected, but Mr. Rumbold was seated on petition. On the 14th Feb. 1771, Mr. Roberts the Returning Officer was brought to the Bar of the House, and on his knees received a very severe reprimand from the Speaker for having taken upon himself to return Mr. Purling.
However, as a result of Mr. Robert's action there had been an investigation.
Parliamentary Elections, New Shoreham Act 1771 | |
---|---|
Act of Parliament | |
Long title | An Act to incapacitate John Burnett, Charles Hannington, Thomas Haselgrove, Ralph Moor, Thomas Parsons, Thomas Snook Junior, Thomas Hannington, John Hannington, John Robinson, William Cheeseman, George Browne, John Parsons, John Curl, Frederick Bean, William Bean, Samuel Tuppen, John Sawyers, Thomas Crowter, Thomas Pockney, Joseph Dedman, John Dean, John Whning, William Stevens. John Bawcomb, Robert Parker, John Hogsflesh, John Purse, John Dean, Thomas Jennings, John Snook Junior, Richard Tilstone, William Turner, Walter Sawyers, Charles Mitchell, John Jarmand, John Wood, Friend Baniel, William Gratwick, Nathaniel Hillman, Thomas Roberts, John Ashman, William Cooter, Thomas Frost, Michael Smith, Richard Carver, Michael Burrant, Emery Churcher, Walter Broad, Richard Stoneham, James Bennett, Clement Freeman, William Jupp, Thomas Crowter, John Barnard, James Mitchell, James Millar otherwise Miller, William Newnham, Jeffery Carver, Randall Button, James Carver, John Martin, John Dedman Senior, William Jennings, William Hards, Thomas Gear, William Rusbridge, Henry Robinson, and Henry Hannington, from voting at Elections of Members to serve in Parliament, and for the preventing Bribery and Corruption in the Election of Members to serve in Parliament, for the Borough of New Shoreham, in the County of Sussex. |
Citation | 11 Geo. 3. c. 55 |
Dates | |
Royal assent | 8 May 1771 |
The evidence given by the Returning Officer, Mr. Hugh Roberts, before the Committee, was the means of bringing to light a most singular system of wholesale bribery, carried on by a body of Electors, who styled themselves, the "Christian Society", and who had for some time being in the habit of selling seats to the highest bidders. By 11th Geo. III. C. 55,[a] the whole of the members, amounting to 81, were deprived of the right of again voting at any Parliamentary Election, and the old class of voters disfranchised, the right of election being extended to the 40s. freeholders of the Rape of Bramber.
The rapes were traditional subdivisions of Sussex. The six rapes each consisted of a strip of territory from the northern border of the county to its southern coast, so the area involved was considerably larger than that of the normal parliamentary borough.
As a result of the extension of the boundaries the constituency became more like a county one than a typical borough of the era.
When an electoral register was first compiled, before the 1832 election, the 1,925 electors included 701 freeholders and 189 scot and lot voters. The remaining electors would have qualified under the occupation franchise introduced for all boroughs by the Reform Act 1832, which also preserved the ancient right franchises of the existing electors. The twentieth century parliamentary historian Lewis Namier said that "New Shoreham was the first borough to be disenfranchised for corruption".[1]
Members of Parliament
1295–1640
1640–1885
Election results
Elections in the 1830s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Charles Burrell | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Henry Howard | Unopposed | |||
Tory hold | |||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Charles Burrell | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Henry Howard | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,600 | ||||
Tory hold | |||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Charles Burrell | 785 | 39.9 | ||
Whig | Harry Goring | 774 | 39.4 | ||
Tory | George Frederick Jones | 406 | 20.7 | ||
Turnout | 1,154 | 59.9 | |||
Registered electors | 1,925 | ||||
Majority | 11 | 0.5 | |||
Tory hold | |||||
Majority | 368 | 18.7 | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Burrell | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Harry Goring | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,910 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Harry Goring | 850 | 37.9 | ||
Conservative | Charles Burrell | 773 | 34.5 | ||
Whig | David Salomons | 619 | 27.6 | ||
Turnout | 1,322 | 68.1 | |||
Registered electors | 1,940 | ||||
Majority | 77 | 3.4 | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Majority | 154 | 6.9 | |||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1840s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Burrell | 959 | 38.5 | +21.3 | |
Conservative | Charles Goring | 856 | 34.4 | +17.2 | |
Whig | Edward Fitzalan-Howard | 673 | 27.0 | −38.5 | |
Majority | 183 | 7.4 | +0.5 | ||
Turnout | 1,581 (est) | 82.4 (est) | c. +14.3 | ||
Registered electors | 1,918 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +20.3 | |||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +18.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Burrell | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Charles Goring | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,864 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Goring's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Lord Alexander Gordon-Lennox | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1850s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Burrell | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Lord Alexander Gordon-Lennox | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,865 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Burrell | 991 | 43.4 | N/A | |
Conservative | Lord Alexander Gordon-Lennox | 806 | 35.3 | N/A | |
Independent Liberal | Henry Williams Pemberton[21][22] | 487 | 21.3 | New | |
Majority | 319 | 14.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,386 (est) | 77.0 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 1,800 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Burrell | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Stephen Cave | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,843 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1860s
Burrell's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Percy Burrell | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Stephen Cave | 972 | 39.6 | N/A | |
Conservative | Percy Burrell | 891 | 36.3 | N/A | |
Liberal | James Hannen[23] | 592 | 24.1 | New | |
Majority | 299 | 12.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,524 (est) | 77.0 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 1,978 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Cave was appointed Vice-President of the Board of Trade, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Stephen Cave | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Percy Burrell | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Stephen Cave | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 4,774 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1870s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Percy Burrell | 2,527 | 43.3 | N/A | |
Conservative | Stephen Cave | 2,414 | 41.4 | N/A | |
Liberal | William Lyon | 896 | 15.4 | New | |
Majority | 1,518 | 26.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 3,367 (est) | 67.4 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 4,998 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Cave was appointed Judge Advocate General of the Armed Forces and Paymaster General, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Stephen Cave | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Burrell's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Walter Burrell | 2,152 | 60.7 | −24.0 | |
Liberal | William Egerton Hubbard[24] | 1,394 | 39.3 | +23.9 | |
Majority | 758 | 21.4 | −4.6 | ||
Turnout | 3,546 | 69.1 | +1.7 | ||
Registered electors | 5,129 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −24.0 |
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Walter Burrell | 2,445 | 37.6 | −5.7 | |
Conservative | Robert Loder | 2,195 | 33.8 | −7.6 | |
Liberal | William Egerton Hubbard[24] | 2,059 | 31.7 | +16.3 | |
Majority | 136 | 2.1 | −23.9 | ||
Turnout | 4,379 (est) | 79.9 (est) | +12.5 | ||
Registered electors | 5,480 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −6.9 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | −7.9 |
See also
Notes and references
- ^ Page 129, Lewis Namier, The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III (2nd edition – London: St Martin's Press, 1957)
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw bx by bz ca "The Story of Shoreham" (PDF). Retrieved 26 December 2011.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 12 November 2011.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 12 November 2011.
- ^ "Gates, Sir John". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/10448. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 12 November 2011.
- ^ "Knollys, Sir Francis (1511/12–1596)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- ^ "Fenner, Sir Edward". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- ^ "Fenner, Thomas". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- ^ Created a baronet, January 1661
- ^ In December 1708 Hammond, who was a Commissioner of the Navy, was voted by the House of Commons to be therefore ineligible for election, and a writ for a by-election was immediately issued
- ^ Created Earl of Mexborough (in the Peerage of Ireland), February 1766
- ^ Created a baronet, February 1766
- ^ On petition, Purling was declared not have been duly elected, and his opponent Rumbold was declared to have been elected instead. Furthermore, the House voted that "the most corrupt practices had been used", and an Act of Parliament was passed in 1771 to permanently disqualify the returning officer and 80 other voters from ever voting again in a Parliamentary election, and to extend the right to vote for the Members for New Shoreham to all the 40 shilling freeholders of the Rape of Bramber.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Stooks Smith, Henry (1845). The Parliaments of England, from 1st George I., to the Present Time. Vol II: Oxfordshire to Wales Inclusive. London: Simpkin, Marshall, & Co. pp. 93–95. Retrieved 1 December 2018 – via Google Books.
- ^ Goring was classified by Craig as a Liberal, although his entry in Dod's Parliamentary Companion (reprinted in Stenton) describes him as "inclined to Conservative principles".
- ^ Churton, Edward (1838). The Assembled Commons or Parliamentary Biographer: 1838. p. 102. Retrieved 1 December 2018 – via Google Books.
- ^ Mosse, Richard Bartholomew (1838). The Parliamentary Guide: a concise history of the Members of both Houses, etc. p. 168. Retrieved 1 December 2018 – via Google Books.
- ^ a b Jenkins, Terry; Spencer, Howard. "New Shoreham". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. pp. 275–276. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3.
- ^ "Election for the Borough of New Shoreham and Rape of Braniber". West Sussex Gazette. 2 April 1857. p. 2. Retrieved 9 July 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ "Dublin Daily Express". 24 March 1857. pp. 3–4. Retrieved 9 July 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ "Representation of Shoreham and Bramber Rape". Sussex Advertiser. 20 June 1865. p. 4. Retrieved 11 March 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ a b "Nominations". Belfast Telegraph. 3 April 1880. p. 3. Retrieved 21 December 2017 – via British Newspaper Archive.
Sources
- Victoria History of the County of Sussex – south part of the Rape of Bramber
- Boundaries of Parliamentary Constituencies 1885–1972, compiled and edited by F. W. S. Craig (Parliamentary Reference Publications 1972)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (The Macmillan Press 1977)
- The Parliaments of England by Henry Stooks Smith (1st edition published in three volumes 1844–50), second edition edited (in one volume) by F.W.S. Craig (Political Reference Publications 1973) out of copyright
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament: Volume I 1832–1885, edited by M. Stenton (The Harvester Press 1976)
- D. Brunton & D. H. Pennington, Members of the Long Parliament (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954)
- Cobbett's Parliamentary history of England, from the Norman Conquest in 1066 to the year 1803 (London: Thomas Hansard, 1808)
- Maija Jansson (ed.) Proceedings in Parliament, 1614 (House of Commons) (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1988)
- J E Neale, The Elizabethan House of Commons (London: Jonathan Cape, 1949)
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "N" (part 2)