Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

French ship Sévère (1778)

History
French Royal Navy EnsignFrance
NameSévère
BuilderLorient [1]
Laid downDecember 1773 [1]
Launched17 January 1775 [1]
In serviceNovember 1778 [1]
Out of service26 January 1784 [1]
FateWrecked 26 January 1784
General characteristics
Class and typeSévère class ship of the line
Tons burthen1300 tons [1]
Length51.2 metres [1]
Beam13.2 metres [1]
Draught6.7 metres [1]
PropulsionSails
Sail planFull-rigged ship
Armament64 guns

Sévère was a 64-gun ship of the line of the French Navy.

Career

Built as an Indiaman by Roth on the lines of a previous ship, Superbe, that had been sold to the Austrian East India Company, Sévère was purchased by the Crown in November 1778 and commissioned for the American Revolutionary War.[1]

She was incorporated into Suffren's squadron. She took part in the Battle of Negapatam in 1782, under Captain Villeneuve-Cillart; during the battle, Cillart panicked and attempted to strike, but was prevented from doing so by officers Dieu and Kerlero de Rosbo. Sévère ended up causing damage to HMS Sultan.[1][Note 1]

In July 1782, in the wake of the Battle of Negapatam, Suffren relieved Cillart from duty and sent him to France to be Court-martialled,[4] replacing him with Lieutenant Maurville de Langle.[5] Maureville de Langle then captained Sévère during the Battle of Trincomalee between 25 August and 3 September 1782,[6] and during the Battle of Cuddalore on 20 June 1783.[7]

Fate

Sévère was later armed en flûte, and was wrecked on 26 January 1784 at the Cape of Good Hope.[1] Consequently, Maurville de Langle was retired from the Navy on 25 July. [8]

Notes

  1. ^ When known in France, the anecdote yielded the pun that "Villeneuve-Cilart wanted to surrender, but "God" (Dieu, the name of the insubordinate officer) would not allow it".[2] Dieu would be killed on Sévère at the Battle of Cuddalore on 20 June 1783.[3]

Citations

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Roche (2005), p. 414.
  2. ^ Hennequin (1835), p. 306.
  3. ^ Lacour-Gayet (1910), p. 546.
  4. ^ Cunat (1852), p. 179.
  5. ^ Cunat (1852), p. 180.
  6. ^ Cunat (1852), p. 217.
  7. ^ Cunat (1852), p. 301-302.
  8. ^ Lacour-Gayet (1910), p. 657.

References