Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997
 | |
| Long title | A bill to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act to improve the regulation of food, drugs, devices, and biological products, and for other purposes. |
|---|---|
| Acronyms (colloquial) | FDAMA |
| Enacted by | the 105th United States Congress |
| Effective | November 21, 1997 |
| Citations | |
| Public law | 105-115 |
| Statutes at Large | 111 U.S. Stat 2296 |
| Codification | |
| Acts amended | Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act |
| Titles amended | Title 21 USC 301: Food and Drugs |
| Legislative history | |
| |
The United States Food and Drug Administration Modernization Acts (FDAMA) are amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which regulated products by the FDA. The first bill, the FDA Modernization Act of 1997, reduced the timeline for approving new pharmaceutical drugs. It also loosened rules around broadcast pharmaceutical advertising.
In 2022, the Act was updated with the FDA Modernization Act 2.0, which cancelled a 1938 mandate to require animal testing for every drug development protocol.
History
Congressman Richard Burr and Senator James M. Jeffords were the chairperson sponsors of the Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Modernization Act of 1997 or FDA Modernization Act of 1997.[1] The U.S. legislation was signed by Bill Clinton on 21 November 1997,[2] and fully enacted by 1 April 1999,[3] putting into law reforms begun under the National Partnership for Reinventing Government. One result of the passing of the act was a reduction in the time for the approval of new pharmaceutical drugs.[4] Critics questioned whether the shortened time frame for the approval of prescription drugs would do more harm than good.[5]
In 2022, the Act was updated with the FDA Modernization Act 2.0. Signed into law by President Joe Biden, the act cancelled an earlier mandate (set by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act of 1938) to require animal testing in drug development.[6]
FDA Modernization Act of 1997
The following are the most significant provisions of the 1997 act:
Prescription drug user fees
The act reauthorized, for five more years, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 (PDUFA). This enabled the FDA to reduce the average time required for a drug review from 30 months to 15 months.
FDA initiatives and programs
The law enacted FDA initiatives undertaken under Vice President Al Gore's Reinventing Government program. The initiatives include measures to modernize the regulation of biological products by bringing them in harmony with the regulations for drugs and eliminating the need for establishment license application; eliminate the batch certification and monograph requirements for insulin and antibiotics; streamline the approval processes for drug and biological manufacturing changes; and reduce the need for environmental assessment as part of a product application.
The act also codified FDA regulations and practice to increase patient access to experimental drugs and medical devices and to accelerate review of important new medications. In addition, the law provided for an expanded database on clinical trials, ClinicalTrials.gov.[7]
Information on off-label use and drug economics
The law abolishes the long-standing prohibition of broadcasting by manufacturers of information about unapproved uses of drugs and medical devices. The act allows a firm to circulate peer-reviewed journal articles about an off-label indication of its product, providing the company is also committing itself to file proof of research within a certain amount of time.
The act also allows drug companies to provide economic information about their products to formulary committees, managed care organizations, and similar large-scale buyers of health-care products. The law, however, does not permit the spreading of economic information that could affect prescribing choices to individual medical practitioners.[8]
Pharmacy compounding
The act creates a special exemption to ensure continued availability of compounded drug products prepared by pharmacists to provide patients with individualized therapies not available commercially. The law, however, seeks to prevent manufacturing under the guise of compounding by establishing parameters within which the practice is appropriate and lawful.[8]
Risk-based regulation of medical devices
The act complements and builds on the FDA's measures to focus its resources on medical devices that present the greatest risks to patients. The law also directs the FDA to focus its post market surveillance on higher risk devices, and allows the agency to implement a reporting system that concentrates on a representative sample of user facilities—such as hospitals and nursing homes—that experience deaths and serious illnesses or injuries linked with the use of devices.
Finally, the law expands an ongoing pilot program under which the FDA accredits outside—so-called "third party"—experts to conduct the initial review of all low-to-intermediate risk class I and II devices. The act, however, specifies that an accredited person may not review devices that are permanently implantable, life-supporting, life sustaining, or for which clinical data are required.[8]
Food safety and labeling
The act eliminates the requirement of the FDA's premarket approval for most packaging and other substances that come in contact with food and may migrate into it. Instead, the law establishes a process whereby the manufacturer can notify the agency of its intent to use certain food contact substances and, unless the FDA objects within 120 days, the manufacturer may proceed with the marketing of the new product. Implementation of the notification process is contingent on additional appropriations to cover its cost to the agency. The act also expands procedures under which the FDA can authorize health claims and nutrient content claims without reducing the statutory standard.[8]
Standards for medical products
In the area of drugs, the law codifies the agency's current practice of allowing in certain circumstances one clinical investigation as the basis for product approval. The act, however, does preserve the presumption that, as a general rule, two adequate and well-controlled studies are needed to prove the product's safety and effectiveness.
In the area of medical devices, the act specifies that the FDA may keep out of the market products whose manufacturing processes are so deficient that they could present a serious health hazard. The law also gives the agency authority to take appropriate action if the technology of a device suggests that it is likely to be used for a potentially harmful unlabeled use.[9][8]
FDA Modernation Act 2.0
In 2022, the FDA Modernization Act 2.0 was approved and signed into law by President Joe Biden.[10] The FDA Modernization Act of 2.0 removed the requirement for animal testing in drug development, making it optional.[11] This enabled further development of new alternative technologies such as cell assays, computer modeling, and bioprinting.
See also
References
- ^ 105th U.S. Congress (April 23, 1997). "H.R.1411: Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Modernization Act of 1997". U.S. House of Representative Bill Summary & Status. Library of Congress THOMAS. Archived from the original on July 5, 2016. Retrieved March 23, 2013.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Clinton, William J. (21 November 1997). "Statement on Signing the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997". The American Presidency Project. John T. Woolley & Gerhard Peters, University of California, Santa Barbara. Retrieved 2009-07-27.
- ^ Buck, Marcia L. (12 January 2000). "The FDA Modernization Act of 1997: Impact on Pediatric Medicine". Pediatric Pharmacotherapy. 6 (12). Medscape.
- ^ Kaitin, Kenneth I.; Joseph A. DiMasi (2000). "Measuring the pace of new drug development in the user fee era" (PDF). Drug Information Journal. 34 (3). Drug Information Association, Inc.: 673–680. doi:10.1177/009286150003400303. S2CID 73311165.
- ^ Friedman, M.D., Michael A. "Testimony on the Implementation of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997". Assistant Secretary For Legislation. Archived from the original on 10 June 2011. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
- ^ Han, Jason (March 2023). "FDA Modernization Act 2.0 allows for alternatives to animal testing". Artificial Organs. PMID 36762462 – via PubMed.
- ^ Todd, JL; White, KR; Chiswell, K; Tasneem, A; Palmer, SM (October 2013). "Using ClinicalTrials.gov to understand the state of clinical research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine". Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 10 (5): 411–7. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201305-111OC. PMC 3882749. PMID 23987571.
- ^ a b c d e "FDA Backgrounder on FDAMA". FDA. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
- ^ "Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997". The National Academies. Archived from the original on 14 March 2012. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
- ^ "Statute at Large 136 Stat. 4459 - Public Law No. 117-328 (12/29/2022)". Congress.gov. November 16, 2024. Retrieved November 16, 2024.
- ^ Adashi, Eli Y. (September 2023). "The FDA Modernization Act 2.0: Drug Testing in Animals is Rendered Optional". The American Journal of Medicine. 136 (9).
