Festungshaft

Festungshaft (English: fortress confinement[1]; Latin: custodia honesta, lit. 'honourary custody') was a privileged custodial sentence in Germany from the 16th century until 1970. It also existed in some neighboring territories and states.
It was a sentence which was generally seen as not conferring dishonour, it granted the sentenced person wide-ranging liberties, and carried no obligation to penal labour.[2]
History
Early history
The concept of Festungshaft began to develop during the 16th century in German military and criminal justice.[2] It was based on the idea of the ius commune that the punishment of an offender should differ based on their standing in the social hierarchy; the reasoning being that conferring the same sentence would be harsher on a noble person than on a commoner.[2] The precise origin of the Festungshaft concept is, however, not known. The German legal scholar Thomas Krause reasons that a military connection seems likely, because many prisoners in fortress confinement were military officers.[2]
As a separate type of custodial sentence, it was only known in some territories of the Holy Roman Empire (e.g., in the Kingdom of Prussia and the Electorate of Saxony), while in other territories only the monarch could impose this privileged type of sentence.[2]
German Empire
With the end of the formal privileges of nobility in criminal justice, fortress confinement was no longer a sentence for the nobility and other persons of high social rank in the German Empire (1871–1945), but was mainly used as a sentence for participating in duels and crimes of a political nature, which were both not seen as generally dishonourable.[2] For duels, fortress confinement was the only type of custodial sentence possible (sections 201–210 of the Reichsstrafgesetzbuch [Reich Criminal Code]). In 1913, for example, 155 persons were sentenced to fortress imprisonment, of those 154 were sentenced for participating in a duel while one offender was sentenced for a political crime. In 1924 – after the conclusion of World War I – 362 persons were sentenced to fortress confinement; of those 51 received the sentence for partaking in a duel, while the rest were sentenced for crimes with a political element.[3]
The Reichsstrafgesetzbuch of 1871, the criminal code of the German Empire, laid down the basic rules for fortress confinement in its section 17:
Die Festungshaft ist eine lebenslängliche oder eine zeitige. Der Höchstbetrag der zeitigen Festungshaft ist funfzehn Jahre, ihr Mindestbetrag ein Tag. Wo das Gesetz die Festungshaft nicht ausdrücklich als eine lebenslängliche androht, ist dieselbe eine zeitige. Die Strafe der Festungshaft besteht in Freiheitsentziehung mit Beaufsichtigung der Beschäftigung und Lebensweise der Gefangenen; sie wird in Festungen oder in anderen dazu bestimmten Räumen vollzogen.
Fortress imprisonment is either lifelong or temporary. The maximum term of temporary fortress imprisonment is fifteen years, the minimum term is one day. Where the law does not expressly threaten fortress imprisonment as lifelong, it is temporary. The punishment of fortress imprisonment consists in deprivation of liberty with supervision of the prisoners' occupation and way of life; it is carried out in fortresses or in other premises designated for this purpose.
— Section 17 of the Reichsstrafgesetzbuch[4]
Under the Reichsstrafgesetzbuch, Festungshaft was in practice[a] the most lenient type of a custodial sentence, the other being – decreasing in harshness – Zuchthausstrafe (correctional sentence), Gefängnißstrafe (prison sentence) and Haft (custody).[6] If Festungshaft was the custodial sentence, the sentenced person could not lose their civilian rights of honour.[7]
The more granular rules for fortress confinement were contained in sections 166–184 of the Grundsätze über den Vollzug von Freiheitsstrafen (Principles on the Execution of Prison Sentences) of 7 June 1923.[8][3] Under these liberal rules, enacted during the time of the Weimar Republic (1918–1933), some German territories (e.g., Prussia, Saxony, and Hamburg) allowed their prisoners in fortress confinement to freely visit the city and persons outside the prison without supervision.[9] Other privileges included that the prisoners were not searched when they began their sentence, that they could drink beer and wine, and that they could receive visitors in their prison cells.[10] The prisoners did not have to wear prison uniforms in fortress confinement.[1]
The liberal rules of 1923 were revised in 1932, when the new Grundsätze für den Vollzug der Festungshaft (Principles on the Execution of Fortress Confinement) of 9 August 1932 were promulgated in the Reichsgesetzblatt (Reich Law Gazette).[11][3] These rules cut back on some of the liberties prisoners in fortress confinement enjoyed.[10]
Federal Republic of Germany
After the end of World War II, fortress confinement was renamed to Einschließung (confinement) in October 1953, and abolished altogether in April 1970.[2]
Notable prisoners in fortress confinement

The most notable prisoner in fortress confinement was probably Nazi Party leader Adolf Hitler, the later dictator of Nazi Germany. After his failed coup d'état, the 1923 Beer Hall Putsch, he was sentenced for high treason to five years in fortress confinement. The proceedings before the People's Court of Bavaria (Bayrisches Volksgericht) were presided over by Georg Neithardt, who had far-right views and sympathies for the putschists.[13][14]
Hitler started his sentence in Landsberg Prison on 1 April 1924, and was released early – in under nine months – on 20 December 1924.[15] His confidant Ernst Hanfstaengl described the life of the prisoner in lavish terms: "[I] walked into a delicatessen. There was fruit and there were flowers, wine and other alcoholic beverages, ham, sausage, cake, boxes of chocolates and much more."[12] Hitler received more the 300 visitors while in fortress confinement.[13][15] He wrote the first part of Mein Kampf ('My Struggle') while imprisoned in Landsberg.[15]
Other notable prisoners in fortress confinement include:
- Anton Graf von Arco auf Valley (fortress confinement in Landsberg Prison for the murder of Kurt Eisner)[16]
- August Bebel (fortress confinement in Hubertusburg for high treason and lèse-majesté [Leipzig high treason proceedings ])[17]
- Karl Liebknecht (fortress confinement in Hubertusburg for high treason [Leipzig high treason proceedings])[17]
- Erich Mühsam (fortress confinement for his participation in the Bavarian Council Republic)[18]
- Werner von Siemens (fortress confinement in Magdeburg Citadel for being a second in a duel)[19]
- Frank Wedekind (fortress confinement in Königstein Fortress for lèse-majesté)[20]
References
Notes
Citations
- ^ a b King 2017, p. 127.
- ^ a b c d e f g Krause 2008, p. 1556.
- ^ a b c Gebert 1932, p. 688.
- ^ RGBl. 1871 p. 130.
- ^ von Tucher 2021, pp. 386, 389.
- ^ Rath 2025.
- ^ von Tucher 2021, p. 389.
- ^ RGBl. 1923 II p. 263.
- ^ Gebert 1932, p. 689.
- ^ a b Gebert 1932, pp. 689–690.
- ^ RGBl. 1932 I p. 407.
- ^ a b Friedmann 2010.
- ^ a b Springer 2023.
- ^ von Tucher 2021, p. 237.
- ^ a b c Kratzer 2015.
- ^ von Tucher 2021, p. 10.
- ^ a b Ulrich 2022.
- ^ Hirte 2016.
- ^ von Siemens 2008, pp. 65–67.
- ^ Seul 2011.
Sources
- Hirte, Chris (6 September 2016). "Mühsam-Tagebücher Band 10: 1922: Berichte aus der Festungshaft". Deutschlandfunk Kultur (in German).
- Friedmann, Jan (23 June 2010). "Adolf Hitler's Time in Jail: Flowers for the Führer in Landsberg Prison". Der Spiegel.
- Gebert (1932). "Die Neuerungen im Vollzüge der Festungshaft". Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform (in German). 23 (1): 688–690. doi:10.1515/mks-1932-230146. ISSN 2366-1968.
- King, David (2017). The Trial of Adolf Hitler: The Beer Hall Putsch and the rise of Nazi Germany. Macmillan. ISBN 9781447251125.
- Kratzer, Hans (20 December 2015). "Gefängnis in Landsberg: Luxushäftling Hitler". Süddeutsche Zeitung (in German).
- Krause, Thomas (2008). "Festungshaft". Handwörterbuch zur deutschen Rechtsgeschichte (in German) (2 ed.). pp. 1555–1557. ISBN 978-3-503-07912-4.
- Rath, Martin (2 February 2025). "Zuchthaus, Gefängnis oder Festungshaft?". Legal Tribune Online (in German).
- von Siemens, Werner (2008). Lebenserinnerungen (PDF) (in German). Zurich and Munich: Piper. ISBN 978-3-492-05269-6.
- Springer, Christian (8 October 2023). "Hitler-Putsch in München: Über das Schicksalsjahr 1923". Die Tageszeitung (in German).
- von Tucher, Nanette (2021). Der Mord an Kurt Eisner durch Anton Graf von Arco auf Valley (in German). utzverlag GmbH. doi:10.5771/9783831676644. ISBN 978-3-8316-7664-4.
- Ulrich, Bernd (11 March 2022). "Tribunal vor 150 Jahren: Warum die Sozialdemokratie vom Leipziger Hochverratsprozess profitierte". Deutschlandfunk (in German).
Further reading
- "Festungshaft". Meyers Konversations-Lexikon (in German). Vol. 6. 1887. p. 188.
- Baer (1928). "Custodia honesta, ein Mißgriff des Strafgesetzentwurfs". Juristische Rundschau. 1928 (24). doi:10.1515/juru.1928.1928.24.273. ISSN 0022-6920.
- Giesing, G. (1940). Entbehrlichkeit der Festungshaft? (in German). Tübingen.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Jennings, G. (1965). Die custodia honesta (in German). Cologne.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Otto, Wilfried (1938). Die Festungshaft: Ihre Vorläufer, Geschichte und Zukunft. Mit einer rechtsvergleichenden Darstellung des österreichischen und tschechoslowakischen Rechts (in German). Pansa.
- Seul, Jürgen (9 March 2011). "Zum Todestag von Frank Wedekind: Dichter und Bürgerschreck". Legal Tribune Online.
- Sontag, Karl Richard (1872). Die Festungshaft: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des deutschen Strafensystems und zur Erläuterung des Reichsstrafrechts (in German). Winter'sche Verlangsbuchhandlung.