I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: the page is still too rough. Almost all of the Description is unsourced, and as currently written is original research WP:Opinion which is not allowed. Also a section "Secondary sources" is not standard in the English Wikipedia, they should all be inline. Indeed, secondary sources are strongly preferred.

Ldm1954 (talk) 19:42, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have been away for some time.

Now I wanted to check our past conversation and cannot find the messages except one.

Is this the only message left visible?

Could you give me the two references to your own Wikipedia pages?

Could you please clarify what you mean with "unsourced"? I added several references to scientific journals.

Should I understand that these are unacceptable? Should all references be Open Access only?

Bests,

Thomas Ozzwah (talk) 16:33, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]