This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Catholicism WikiProject Catholicism is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism Catholicism task list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see Draft articles Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page) Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Archives

Archive 1: December 2005 – June 2006 Archive 2: July 2006 – August 2006 Archive 3: September 2006 – January 2008 Archive 4: February 2008 – December 2008 Archive 5: January 2009 – December 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Part of a series on the
WikiProject Catholicism
General information Main project page (Talk) Members (Talk) To-do list (Talk) Popular pages (Talk) Assessment (Talk) Quality operations (Talk) Canon law Task Force (Talk) Collaboration (Talk) Strategy (Talk) Terminology (Talk) Articles alerts (Talk) Project category (Talk)
Main templates {{Catholic Church footer}} (talk) {{Catholic Church sidebar}} (talk) {{Holy See}} (talk) {{Papacy}} (talk) {{WikiProject Catholicism}} (talk)
Convention proposals Naming conventions (Catholic Church) (Talk) Manual of Style/Catholic Church (Talk) Naming conventions (Catholicism) (Talk) See also: User:Grabado/List
Essays CC vs. RCC (Talk) Names of the Catholic Church (Talk) Catholic or Roman Catholic? (Talk)
Related WikiProject Christianity (Talk) Portal:Christianity (Talk)
Catholic Church portal (Talk)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Godric#Requested move 12 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 17:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic theology, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RfC for value. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jeaucques Quœure (talk) 03:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Over the past two years, a vast number of articles related to the Trinity, the Arian controversy, and 4th century Church history have been overhauled and/or bloated with material of a decidedly pro-Arian/anti-Trinitarian slant, including Homoousion, Arian controversy, and dozens more. The main user behind this transformation is AndriesvN, an extremely prolific Arian apologist who runs the blog revelationbyjesuschrist.com, one of whose stated purposes is to "oppose the Trinity doctrine." See his contributions for a sense of their scope and character.

While the user in question often adds serious content and cites legitimate scholarly works, it's consistently written in a polemical tone that fails to meet Wikipedia's Neutral POV principle, and often is improperly cited and/or mixed with original research from his blog. He's also shown himself averse to constructive criticism, as seen from his talk page.

While I've attempted to fix some of the more egregious revisions (e.g. to Athanasius of Alexandria), as a Wikipedia rookie and full-time theology student I lack the bandwidth to revise and factcheck all the articles in question, and for this reason I'm appealing for your help, especially those of you who have background in theology/Church history. Your assistance with reviewing, revising and factchecking these articles is greatly appreciated. Thank you!

(And of course, feel free to get any other community involved if you think they could help. I'm about to ask WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy.)

- HieronymusNatalis (talk) 08:38, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: There's now an ANI open on the user in question, recommending a topic ban, in case anyone wants to weigh in: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#AndriesvN_and_Christian_theology_articles

HieronymusNatalis (talk) 11:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: The user in question has been indef blocked as of today for being WP:NOTHERE. However, their numerous edits remain in need of review. See Special:Contributions/AndriesvN for a sense of what pages need work. It's a pretty hefty task. Thanks for any help! -HieronymusNatalis (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Off the project, a few editors have asked me about whether WikiProject Catholicism is still a salient force on the project, most recently yesterday. While the WikiProject's members are definitely active and contributing new articles and content at a prodigious rate, it might be time for us to consider a more organized approach. I'm not super keen on things like Discord, but that could be an option to coordinate efforts. If anyone else has thoughts, please let me know! ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say Pbritti, but I like Discord... ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 20:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Francis W. Kelly ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 00:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a draft for Abigail Favale. The article may be of interest to members of this project. Thriley (talk) 20:26, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For a number of Popes who have been canonised since their deaths (as well as other canonised clergy), there seems to be a disparity between the use of the Saint infobox and the Christian Leader infobox: some place the saint infobox at the top of the article, directly after the Christian leader infobox; others place the saint infobox under the canonisation/veneration section of the article. Is there any established consensus on which is best here? Also, all of the information in the saint infobox tends to be duplicated in the sainthood section of the Christian leader infobox – is it not therefore redundant to use both infoboxes within an article? Vesuvio14 (talk) 00:03, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we should only have one per article, but people love adding them. Johnbod (talk) 02:33, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There should only be one infobox, probably the Christian Leader one for more modern popes at very least; and then using the module attribute to add in the relevant saint sections if any other things are needed. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 13:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Saints Cosmas and Damian#Requested move 9 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Feeglgeef (talk) 19:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please join this discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:13, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand it correctly, the Avignon Papacy is about a line of popes before the Western Schism. If so? I had to de-link at pages of anti-popes during the schism. GoodDay (talk) 21:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you don't understand it correctly. Have you tried reading the first lines of those articles? Johnbod (talk) 21:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox says "1309–1376", with Gregory XI listed as the last pope, which indicates before the Western Schism. Therefore the intro is inconsistent, if the 1378–1417 Schism era is included. To avoid the inconsistencies, the Avignon Papacy page should be split into two pages - Avignon Papacy 1309–1376 & Avignon Papacy 1378–1417. At the very least, the schism info is misplaced. GoodDay (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please head over here Talk:Catholic Church#RfC: Establishing an independent Catholicism article, thank you! Kenneth Kho (talk) 08:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]