Eddie891 (talk ·  · contribs · global contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · user creation · block user · block log · count · total · logs · summary · email | lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · spi · socks | rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp | current rights · rights log (local) · rights log (global/meta) | rights · renames · blocks · protects · deletions · rollback · admin · logs | UHx · AfD · UtHx · )

I think this is the most comprehensive such template.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  12:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Eddie891 § General comments

 – Mz7 (talk) 22:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an issue with the vote counter? Showing 1 Neutral comment, however none have been posted. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RickinBaltimore, seems to be that there is a # symbol in the Neutral section. epicgenius (talk) 15:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberpower678: This edit made the bot start counting a neutral vote. It looks like a small bug in the code, but I can't read this particular code well enough to be sure. QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Although, oddly, when I checked earlier there was also one in the oppose section, and it wasn't generating a false oppose. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When there are general comments but no neutrals, the bot reads it as there being one neutral. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed. This is a longstanding bug in the tally bot—removing the hash sign (#) in the neutral section fixes the issue. See also Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Cullen328#Glitch in the automated tally?. Mz7 (talk) 22:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]