Wikipedia:WikiProject Hampshire/Assessment
Assessment progress
Below is a bot-generated table stats are generated automatically every 2-3 days, but they can be updated manually by entering Hampshire into the box here.
Quality scale
The quality of articles is assessed according to the guidelines at WP:ASSESS, which is a common set of criteria used across many Wikiprojects:
Importance scale
The importance of articles is a more local criterion. It mirrors the project-wide importance scheme, but in relation to a publication purely about Hampshire as opposed to a general encyclopaedia. For example, articles on Hampshire's subdivisions and prinicpal settlements might not appear as stand-alone entries in a general print encyclopaedia but would be essential inclusions in an encyclopaedia of Hampshire.
| Top | Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia. |
| High | Subject is exceptionally important. |
| Mid | Subject contributes a depth of knowledge. |
| Low | Subject fills in important details. |
| NA | Subject importance is not applicable. |
Rule of thumb:
| Top | Cities and major towns (Basingstoke), local government districts, grade I listed buildings, scheduled ancient monuments |
| High | Grade II and II* listed buildings; market towns (Aldershot, Andover, Eastleigh, Lyndhurst, Lymington, Romsey, Fareham etc); national parks; motorways and trunk roads; major rivers |
| Mid | Civil parishes, equivalent suburbs and smaller towns; major railway stations; country parks; people who had a significant influence on Hampshire |
| Low | Villages and hamlets within civil parishes; suburban neighbourhoods; local parks; people connected with Hampshire by birth or residence; minor railway stations; everything else that is applicable |
Templates
- Talk page header: {{hants}}
- Userbox: {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Hampshire/userbox}}