Welcome to the assessment department of the Addictions and recovery WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Addictions and recovery articles. The article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

Ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Addictions and recovery}} project banner. Filling in a rating in the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Addictions and recovery}} template on the talk page of an article causes the name of that article to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Addiction and recovery articles by quality, which can then be seen in the #Current status section below.

How can I get an article rated?

Do it yourself or list it in the section for assessment requests below.

On what basis are assessments made?

We have not established project-specific criteria, so we use the scales at Template:Grading scheme and Template:Importance scheme. See also Template:WikiProject Addictions and recovery/doc and the popularity ranking

Who can assess articles?

Any Wikipedia contributor

What if I don't agree with a rating?

Change it or discuss it in the article talk page.

Where are articles needing assessment?

At Category:Unassessed addiction and recovery articles and in the #Requesting an assessment section below.

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new quality rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Note: This is only to rate the article on quality – you may or may not get feedback on the article. If you desire a review, use the peer review process. If you assess an article, please remove it so that other editors will not waste time reviewing the same articles. Thanks!

Articles submitted here will not be rated above 'B'; see Wikipedia:Good articles and Wikipedia:Featured articles for higher assessments.

Edit this section and place request here:

• 1.3% List-Class
• 9.7% Stub-Class
• 37.7% Start-Class
• 36% C-Class
• 13.1% B-Class
• 2.1% GA-Class

The following table is convenient for determining priority articles and overall project coverage, but is maintained by the WP_1.0_bot, which is poorly maintained and updates the table only unreliably.	Articles by Quality and Importance	The following are updated nearly immediately.
	Addiction and recovery articles Importance Refresh  Top   High   Mid   Low   ???  Total Quality  FA 0 0 0 0 0 0  A 0 0 0 0 0 0  GA 0 0 0 0 0 5 B 0 0 0 0 0 31 C 0 0 0 0 0 85 Start 0 0 0 0 0 89 Stub 0 0 0 0 0 23  FL 0 0 0 0 0 0 List 0 0 0 0 0 3 ??? 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 11 34 41 146 5 237	Importance scale  Top   High   Mid   Low   NA   ???  Total  11   34   41   146   97  5   334  Quality scale  FA  A  GA B C Start Stub  FL List NA ??? Total 0 0 5 31 85 89 23 0 3 97 0 333

The logs in this section are generated automatically; please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading or raising an article more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

• Draft:HOW DARE YOU REJECT THIS EXACT ARTICLE! (talk) removed.

• Draft:HOW DARE YOU REJECT THIS EXACT ARTICLE! (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

• Draft:Jenny Tough renamed to Jenny Tough.