Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 May 18

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2014, and doesn't actually use Wikidata to get information, so it is not usable without significant development. Someone would be better off copying a working /Wikidata template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion in a discussion page. Content was incorporated into the main template in 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Other templates presumably do the job. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. No incoming links from discussions. Created in April 2021. Could be useful, but it appears to be an abandoned experiment at this time. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to have been abandoned in favor of {{Infobox Pro hockey team}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2009. Any uses of this have presumably been merged into a more comprehensive auto racing season infobox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed after the parent template was merged in 2014 (see link in section below). I have copied all of the content of this page to Template:Infobox baseball biography/testcases in case any of the testcases demonstrate something helpful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:18, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed, per this 2014 TFD. May be eligible for speedy deletion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years out of date, and transcluded only in the creator's user space. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 26. plicit 03:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 25. Izno (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 25. Izno (talk) 19:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 19:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think this was created a little too early, as it does not meet the criteria at WP:NAVBOX. It has too few links in it's current state. Also, the articles in the second section seem to (or will) link to the same articles in the first section, which seems kinda superfluous. – JuneGloom07 Talk 17:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in August 2021 for unclear reasons. No incoming links from discussions or anywhere else. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2017. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would love for this template to be useful, but it has no transclusions. Created in 2015. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2020. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no real documentation. Created in 2020. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This misnamed sidebar template was kept in a 2020 TFD, but it no longer has any transclusions. If it was used at that time, I suspect that it was replaced by links in navboxes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2019. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2014. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page has been userfied and can be deleted until it is needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. I suspect that relevant articles use a more general infobox template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Relevant articles, like Triyuga Municipality, use {{infobox settlement}} and appear to work just fine. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Relevant articles appear to use the more general {{infobox basketball club}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, nearly two years after creation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2009. Either some other template meets the need for this one, or articles for individual team seasons have not passed the notability threshold. Most articles on GAA teams/clubs, even the senior clubs, are pretty short. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 25. Izno (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in May 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2007. It appears that some other template may be meeting the need for this one. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 25. Izno (talk) 19:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox proposed in 2015 but not adopted. Subst and delete, or move to subpage of the talk page maybe. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in one editor's sandbox, which was last edited in 2009. Violates MOS:FONTSIZE accessibility guideline. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions on en.WP. This template is used on Commons and was discussed on en.WP as possibly usable here, but it is not currently in use six years after that discussion. I suggest moving the two photos that link to it to Commons and deleting this template on en.WP. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No documentation or categories. Used only on one editor's user subpage, last edited in 2006. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sidebar template with no transclusions in article space. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hockey team flag template with no transclusions, created in 2011. Either this is not useful or other templates do the same job. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Football team flag template with no transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox whose main article was deleted in 2021. Used in one editor's draft article. Userfy until that draft makes it to article space. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IT really should be deleted. I just forgot all about the template.Whoisjohngalt (talk) 13:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replace with {{icon|dga}} in the same way as done by this 2010 TFD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Replace and Delete per nom. Barely used wrapper template that saves no text compared to the template it is wrapping. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 12:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This template appears to have been replaced by the more general {{Sportname at the YYYY Winter Olympics category}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. I haven't dug through the discussions, but it appears that this functionality has been merged into {{NHLPlayoffs}} and {{Infobox ice hockey game}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep now that the code has been fixed Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used and misused in the series of articles about European sailing championships. The template, as inserted, creates a sea of red links for non-existent events, such as Germany at the 2015 Summer Olympics and Netherlands at the 2010 Summer Olympics, and thus one could question its outright utility in presenting information in a manner that is not misleading if not its capacity of being used correctly.  Ohc revolution of our times 05:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction made! The template FlagIOC is no longer used. Thus the incorrect links to non existing Olympic games no longer exist.Dragon Genoa (talk) 18:16, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 08:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep and fix the code. although this hack does technically work, it's not the best solution since it eliminates the good linking for Olympics pages. perhaps the best solution is to have the template read the page title and act appropriately (now implemented). Frietjes (talk) 23:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 01:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused hurricane templates. Note that Template:HurricaneActive and Template:HurricaneActive2 were deleted years ago but these were probably still used somewhere until recently. Gonnym (talk) 07:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 01:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/TER Bretagne. Gonnym (talk) 07:18, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 01:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Milan Metro. Gonnym (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-pro basketball roster used on only one page. With notability for individual seasons not especially likely, this can be subst'd and deleted. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to be redundant to {{ISO date}} with |class=dtend, but I could be missing something. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in late 2020, does not appear to have been adopted yet. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created almost two years ago. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 01:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2009. Appears that it was never adopted or is no longer useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roster template for a defunct semi-pro basketball team. It is only linked on one page, and with the team no longer in existence, it is highly unlikely that this template will ever find a use elsewhere. Subst and delete. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:11, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2013, appears that is has not proved useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 25. Izno (talk) 05:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 01:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2009. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links. Created in 2014. Does not appear to have found a use. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Unused, silly and unencyclopedic message (Labelling files as "Huge" seems to have completely the wrong tone), the issue this is supposed to tag is not something that can be resolved with clean-up so an inline clean-up tag is not appropriate, what classifies a file as "Huge" is completely subjective and depends upon the device and internet connection used to access it, in previous discussions about these style of "bandwidth warnings" templates they have been felt to violate the spirit of WP:No disclaimers, e.g. Template:Many images. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 11:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:37, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2014. Nay. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used only on one editor's draft article, not edited by them since 2011. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I have forgotten about it, but I see no reason it cannot be applied to all articles within Category:Honorverse (counting articles on individual books we have over two dozen). The intent for this is identical to that for Template:Memory Alpha. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions of the navbox exist in article space. Its function is better served by the more comprehensive {{Football in Hong Kong}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created as an apparent experiment, used only on two of that user's pages. Does not appear to be useful elsewhere. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used in a single editor's page for formatting. Userfy as a subpage of that editor's user page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used in one user subpage, last edited by that editor in 2009. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template was proposed in 2010 as a solution to a niche problem, but it has not been adopted. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Player2. Izno (talk) 05:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:MPBL player with Template:Player2.
MPBL player seems to be essentially identical to Player2, except the latter is used on FAR more pages than the former is. Seeing as how Player2 is for basically any professional basketball player, there's no reason to think a separate template for players of a semi-professional league would be necessary to convey additional information. fuzzy510 (talk) 03:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox for members of a semi-professional championship basketball team. As they did not play professionally, most are likely to not be notable enough for inclusion. fuzzy510 (talk) 03:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused meaningfully, would basically be equivalent to Template:high traffic if it were noticeable and basically not meaningful if not. Izno (talk) 03:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_May_17#Template:14HighValue. This one transcludes multiple paragraphs directly onto articles, making it difficult to edit and any edit would have to be made to all transclusions. This isn't what templates are used for. Subst and delete.

This one has a bit of a long history with TFD - two discussions in 2009 and a 2017 discussion that was closed as no consensus apparently without any comments Hog Farm Talk 02:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. --Izno (talk) 03:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete. Looking at the discussion history on this one, it was closed as keep in June 2009, closed as subst and delete in September 2009 and then a deletion review in November 2009 confirmed the deletion decision. The only reason the template is still here is that the September 2009 closing decision had the caveat, "substitute and delete after consensus is reached regarding the precise wording of the text." As there was no formal mechanism to confirm consensus was reached, the deletion decision was never enforced. If consensus of the wording hasn't been agreed after 13 years, I think it is best to place the text back in the articles and leave it to individual article consensus to resolve any required variation. From Hill To Shore (talk) 07:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete, per previous discussions. Articles may then be edited individually as normal to resolve any supposed issues with the text. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete as above, particularly per FHTS. Parsecboy (talk) 11:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).