Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 31

August 31

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:58, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:57, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; probably replaced by the corresponding navbox. Frietjes (talk) 19:56, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:54, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:52, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; probably replaced by {{MThow banner}} Frietjes (talk) 19:52, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:51, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:15, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:43, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:15, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:15, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:41, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retain the entry because it provides well-sourced knowledge (from the Census Bureau) that every single human being can freely share. Otherwise, this knowledge would be only in the hands of people who might not share it. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:15, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 19:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Singapore libraries. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:19, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Singapore NLB libraries with Template:Singapore libraries.
Identical content. -- AquaDTRS (talk) 19:35, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

single-use templates which can be easily merged with the corresponding article. Frietjes (talk) 18:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no longer needed after the "squad number suppression" feature was added to the main templates Frietjes (talk) 17:12, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kayne West album track list templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 8. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

rarely used, can be replaced with other more common squad templates (e.g., {{Fb si player}}) Frietjes (talk) 16:06, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

rarely used and redundant to {{fb ss player}}/{{fb ss header}}. if there is a particular reason that we need to have the nationality after the name, we can add an option for that to the main templates. Frietjes (talk) 15:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:57, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no longer needed after being replaced by Module:sports rbr table Frietjes (talk) 15:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting. As File:Flag of Hezbollah.svg is a copyrighted image (and indeed, can theoretically only be added to "pages for which it is specifically allowed") it needs a fair use rationale for every article its used in. As the only use of this template is to provide a tiny icon next to the word Hezbollah in an infobox or similar, there's really no justification for its use, making this template completely redundant. 2.124.101.219 (talk) 16:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose: This Template is used across 45 pages. It would be simpler to substitute the image with the non-copyrighted File:InfoboxHez.PNG 217.100.32.162 (talk) 07:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Noting that the template uses File:InfoboxHez.PNG and did so at the time of nomination too
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:43, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Orders, decorations, and medals of Australia. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Australian royal honours with Template:Orders, decorations, and medals of Australia.
While generally tmeplates should avoid to be that large, consistently this subject has offered a significant exception to that rule for better overview purposes. Chicbyaccident (talk) 10:52, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have no issue with a merger. The Australian royal honours template was made due to a desire by other editors to keep the Orders, decorations, and medals of Australia template for purely Australian established awards. Although some royal honours have drifted onto the Orders, decorations, and medals of Australia template. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 22:11, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:36, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Navigates only 3 topics. Izno (talk) 00:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox which misses the cut for WP:NENAN and which doesn't have a reasonable hope of future expansion. Izno (talk) 01:38, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still researching Takeru (Sur De Wave), and their games. For Cocoron, it was developed by "K2" (""K2 Multi Creative Team"). The staff all overlaps with Takeru, so it appears to be just a sub-set of Takeru. Almost all,or all of them, worked on Nostalgia 1907. And K2 only worked on one game. Thus it appears that K2 is not a real company per se, but a team led by Akira Kitamura in Takeru. Most sources just attribute it to Takeru.

The template could be expanded in a number of ways. Takeru made other games, including NEC PC98 and FM Towns titles "Presence", Dennou Shoujo Rejection", and possibly others. They had several cancelled titles, like "Pop'n Land", that got a lot of attention (several issues of Beep! magazine, several English and French mags).

There's also the fact that most of the staff went to the Mitchell corporation, so that could be added as related. And the key staff are Kouichi Yotsui (Strider), Akira Kitamura (Mega Man and Mega Man 2), Shinichi Yoshimoto (Ghouls 'n Ghosts), and Utata Kiyoshi (Metal Storm). With more research, I could make pages for them. Harizotoh9 (talk) 03:46, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:19, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 8. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).