The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Constituency MSP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Constituency MSP1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Constituency MSP Begin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Appears to be a series of templates for a table, but they were never finished or adopted. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge with Members of the Regional Council of Veneto, 2005–10. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Composition of the Regional Council of Veneto, 2005-2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Should be merged with an article if one exists, as these are historical. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:43, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge with Members of the Regional Council of Calabria, 2005–10. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:58, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Composition of the Regional Council of Calabria, 2005-2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Should be merged with an article if one exists, as these are historical. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:43, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ColortableH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No clue what this is for, as there's no documentation. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ColortableF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No clue what this is for, as there's no documentation. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ColPollTable (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, and likely to be WP:NOTSTATS if used. Note that the subtemplates below will need to be speedy deleted once this is deleted.

• {{ColPollTable/1}}
• {{ColPollTable/2}}
• {{ColPollTable/3}}
• {{ColPollTable/4}} ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:BU Rob13, the idea was to merge all of these. So, you would rather selectively delete some of the subtemplates rather than merging all of them into one template? Currently, people use {{ColPollTable/1}} during the first week, then {{ColPollTable/2}} in the second week, ..., up to the final week of the season. This is why the lower numbered ones have no transclusions, but the higher numbered ones do. I would think it would be better to avoid the code duplication and have one template for all 25 weeks. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Plastikspork: Ah, hadn't realized there were more of these out there. Was there ever a merge discussion? Is there consensus already to merge the other templates into the one you created? If not, we should probably hold that discussion instead. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:BU Rob13, there was already consensus to merge them back in 2009. I started to merge them, but ran into template complexity limits and just left them as subpages until I could figure out a work around. But, now that we have LUA, it should be pretty easy to complete the merger (and hopefully include templates like Template:8Col15PollTable). Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Plastikspork: Alright, mind relisting the ones we already have consensus for at WP:TFD/H? I'll close this as withdrawn. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Closedproxy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:39, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is its purpose better served by a different template? – Uanfala (talk) 23:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 27 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Classical Radio Stations in Maine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Classical Radio Stations in Vermont (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Classical Radio Stations in Virginia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Portland Sea Dogs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with just 2 links. Three links go to the team article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:30, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - It provides no useful navigation. NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as fancruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as other information is out there, such as their radio network.Stereorock (talk) 06:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, better to use in-article linking. it's unfortunate that some editors don't like to write prose and think that everything needs a navbox. Frietjes (talk) 20:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Table Tennis in Japan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicates Category:Japanese table tennis players which is automatically kept up-to-date, where this template is either not automatically kept up-to-date or requires some sort of WP:POV sub-selection. Frietjes (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Amarillo Thunderheads roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

General maintenance. Team no longer exists, therefore we no longer need a current roster template, as there is no current roster. Template is unused now. oknazevad (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, defunct. Frietjes (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. Kierzek (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 27 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cclink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cc-by-sa-3.0-us (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused image licensing template. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:32, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cc-by-sa-3.0-de (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused image licensing template. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:32, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cc-by-sa-3.0-br (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused image licensing template. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cc-by-sa-2.5-nl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused image licensing template. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cc-by-sa-2.5-my (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused image licensing template. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 November 27. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cc-by-sa-2.0-be (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused image licensing template. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: It's a permissible license, and it has been used in the past. --Carnildo (talk) 07:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cc-by-layout-works (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused image licensing template. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cc-by-2.5-in (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused image licensing template. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cc-by-2.5-ca (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused image licensing template. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:30, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cc-by-2.5-au (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused image licensing template. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:30, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 27 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Unblock request declined (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Unblock reviewed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 77th ID (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template contains one entry. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, provides little useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not substantial. Kierzek (talk) 14:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 November 27. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Yugoslavia squad - 1967 FIBA World Championship for Women (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 104th JD (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template contains one entry. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not substantial. Kierzek (talk) 14:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 112th ID (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template contains one entry. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not substantial. Kierzek (talk) 14:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Knight's Cross recipients in the Nationale Volksarmee (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template similar to recently deleted template (see TFD:Knight's Cross holders in the Bundeswehr) and is unnecessary cross categorisation. The article on the topic of KC recipients in the armed forces of East Germany does not exist, and this subject has not received attention from sources, as far as I know. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, for same reasons as the one linked. "Unnecessary concoction". Kierzek (talk) 14:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 334th ID (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template contains one entry. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not substantial. Kierzek (talk) 14:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the 262nd ID (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Both articles in the template are redirects to a list. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, this one as not notable for separate listing. I will look at the other two later. Kierzek (talk) 01:38, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).