• The White House from Faisalabad (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

100% sure this is same user. Just need to run CU —Saqib (talk | contribs) 18:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I suggest this page be renamed to since first account Sheikh Rehan Shahid (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) was blocked back in 2023. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: Since you've asked for behavioural evidence to make a connection between all these accounts, please note that the usernames of these accounts: Sheikh Rehan Shahid (talk · contribs), Sheikh Rehan Shahid Official (talk · contribs) and Sh Rehan Shahid (talk · contribs). Now first, see this and this edits by User:Yoyojojoop. Now see this edit by User:The White House from Faisalabad. Now see this edit by User:Sh Rehan Shahid, see this by User:Sheikh Rehan Shahid. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 13:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ANI#The White House from Faisalabad.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Saqib: Any change to the master should be made after a check has been run.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• These two accounts are  Confirmed to one another. All their edits have come from a narrow range, which doesn't appear to have anyone else using it. Sheikh Rehan Shahid is stale, and while there are some records in the CU logs, all I can say is that they are in the same large country as these two accounts. Behavioural investigation would be needed to make a connection between them. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Close this as stale, it's not worth chasing the specific categorization of socks from 2 months ago. Izno (talk) 17:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• The White House from Faisalabad (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) ( Clerk note: original case name)

• UsernameTalk (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Introducing false information and WP:OR to the BLPs of Pakistani legislators. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Must be Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yoyojojoop. --—Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Closing as blocked. Izno (talk) 17:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• The Washington from Layallpur (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Same editing behaviour. Creating BLPs on lawmakers from Faisalabad - with false information! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Bbb23: Was this account blocked based on CU ? —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Saqib: No.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• And this one. CU isn't necessary for WP:DUCKs. (Meanwhile, AIV is much more responsive to DUCKs so consider reportin there in the future.) Izno (talk) 17:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Christmas or not (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) ( Clerk note: original case name)

• Yoyojojoop (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 2407:D000:405:8578:B128:510B:24C4:991D (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2407:D000:405:3DD8:C9A8:AF0A:47AD:F0B6 (talk ·  · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

The user is back to wreak havoc! Saqib (talk) 08:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - the SPI filed under the wrong title. Master is Yoyojojoop. — Saqib (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So the socks of Yoyojojoop have a pattern of editing pages related to Faisalabad and Pakistani lawmakers. Generally, socks of Yoyojojoop first tend to make minor, unconstructive edits - and do not make outright vandalism - but then they include obvious vandalism as well. In this case, User:Christmas, since the creation of their account, began by editing pages related to Faisalabad and then progressed to making minor edits to BLPs on Pakistani lawmakers. While their current edits are not pure vandalism but unconstructive so I felt it's important to note this account for the record as it could potentially escalate into vandalism sooner or later. Having said that, if a CU yields no connection, the account can remain unblocked, and I will monitor it for any engagement in pure vandalism. However, if it does, it should be promptly blocked to prevent future damage to BLPs and save others time. — Saqib (talk) 12:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IPs editing Draft:Chuadhary Sher Ali, a draft which was created by master account. It's fishy when IPs edit draft on some ROTM politician. IPs also editing pages which were previously edited by master account and/or their socks.Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Hi Girth Summit, Just let me wrap my head around this. What am I being accused of here?

  I have edited many, many pages over a fair bit of time, yes, pages of some past and present lawmakers, many of which, truth be told, were poorly put together, often unsourced and some with typos. I have also edited pages of articles of towns and cities big and small. That is all that I have tried to do.

  If I have changed any pages I have done so only to improve the content and flow and fix typos. Christmas or not (talk) 15:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Christmas or not, Just curious how did you find this SPI ? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  For real, dude? I received all of these comments in my alerts. Christmas or not (talk) 19:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Christmas or not, Exactly. Apparently you've this SPI in your watchlist which is suspicious in itself. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It honestly isn't fair to blame me for these alerts reaching me. I am sure someone at Wikipedia can help explain why this is done. If I am getting this, then I imagine others accused of such things do too.

  The main reason I can think of why these alerts have been shared with me is that Wikipedia wants to ensure transparency, fairness and does want people to be aware if they are accused of something. Christmas or not (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Additional information needed - Saqib, you haven't actually provided any evidence here. I've blocked AqeelWakeel, who is  Confirmed to Yoyojojoop, but to justify running a check on Christmas or not I would need some behavioural evidence, which you haven't presented. I'm not familiar with the case - can you please spell it out? Girth Summit _(blether) 11:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm not blocking Christmas or not, because the behavioral evidence isn't quite strong enough to me. However, while investigating I did catch The White House from Old Faisalabad so I'll block and tag that as a WP:DUCK. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 23:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• The White House from Faisalabad (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) ( Clerk note: original case name)

• The White House from New Faisalabad (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Same username and same editing pattern at Abid Sher Ali. Passes DUCKTEST! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Does it seem logical to approve drafts from socks associated with this one, given that once socking is confirmed, the article will inevitably be deleted under G5. These socks consistently create BLPs that meet NPOL but occasionally include fictitious and unreliable sources, and even WP:OR. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• I agree, this is pretty obvious block evasion, based on the username. I ran a check for sleepers but didn't find any. (The White House from New Faisalabad is  Confirmed to The Washington from Layallpur and UsernameTalk, though.) @Saqib: It's up to you whether you want to approve any drafts from these socks; if you decide to move the draft to mainspace yourself, that could be construed as "substantial edits by others", which would disqualify the page from WP:G5.  Blocked and tagged. Closing. Mz7 (talk) 07:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Mini miniah (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Same editing behaviour. Creating BLPs on lawmakers from Faisalabad - with false information! Passes DUCKTEST! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Endorse the reporter's findings and request prompt action. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:42, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Confirmed. I also found the following account, which is  Likely: Bosspresident (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki).  Blocked and tagged. Closing. Mz7 (talk) 00:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Prp people (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Another sock, same edit, Diff of Mini miniah and Diff of Prp. The same draft was created and deleted multiple times. Although the subject meets WP:NPOL, it still cannot be accepted. GrabUp - Talk 15:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Endorse the reporter's findings, request a prompt action. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Confirmed. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Blocked and tagged. Closing. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Jazba-e-Janoon (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

WP:DUCK, same behavior as previous socks, obsessed with Faisalabad related articles. Keeps pushing for same edits over and over again. I tried to work with them and not report them initially, but it was of no avail. Can we block account creation from their IP block? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 --— Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Confirmed Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Blocked and tagged. Closing. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Sig ma rehan (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Alpha rehan (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Rehan Chairman (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Both accounts are now blocked for adding hoaxes and fake information to BLPs. However, I want to check if they are socks of Yoyojojoop to better understand if they are engaging in this new type of disruptive editing. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 12:43, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• They just created another account few minutes ago, added it to the list. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 17:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Blocked. Izno (talk) 20:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Islamabad White Castle (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

The kid is back to ruin our pages and waste our time. It seems like they have too much free time on their hands, but they need to realize that we don’t. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Izno: You asked for actual evidence, but the issue is that this user is getting clever. Every time they create a new account, their pattern changes. They start with some constructive edits and then gradually introduce unwanted content, leading to WP:DE. --— Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:23, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Confirmed. Please ensure you submit some actual evidence rather than railing at the system. ;) Izno (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• MNA bot (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

They’re back again to disrupt our articles and waste our time with similar edits to what Islamabad White Castle did. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Already blocked, nothing left to do here. RoySmith (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• MPA ff (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Back again! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1) The user created Draft:Mehar Abdul Rasheed, which has been created multiple times by socks of the master account. 2) Their new username is MPA, which is abbreviation of Member of the Provincial Assembly of Pakistan, whereas yesterday their username was MNA bot, which is abbreviation of Member of the National Assembly of Pakistan. --— Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Additional information needed - As Izno said a few days ago, Please ensure you submit some actual evidence. RoySmith (talk) 15:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Confirmed RoySmith (talk) 15:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually, they're only confirmed to MNA bot; I haven't fully traced this back to Yoyojojoop. I'll let somebody else figure out how to handle the tagging, possible G5, etc. RoySmith (talk) 15:57, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• MP, from Capital (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

This account was created after the previous one was blocked and shows the same editing pattern, vandalizing the bios of Pakistani lawmakers. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Confirmed to Alpha rehan and the MNA bot group. Izno (talk) 18:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• MP, from Faisalabad (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

WP:DUCK, MP, from Capital (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), now MP, from Faisalabad. Also, editing pattern is similar to previous socks, Musarrat Asif Khawaja (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) is one of the articles which previous socks are known to edit and they are doing the same. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 15:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So annoying. Is there a permanent solution to this? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Confirmed  No sleepers immediately visible RoySmith (talk) 15:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• MP, from Murree (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Pro-forma filing RoySmith (talk) 16:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

---

• L, from O Block (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

WP:DUCK, MP, from Murree (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), MP, from Faisalabad (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), MP, from Capital (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and now this latest twist, L, from O Block. The new sock is also editing Changez Ahmed Khan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), just like the earlier ones did.[1], [2], [3] MP, from Murree was blocked on 8 November and this new sock was created on 10 November. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:01, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Blocked, didn't see sleepers. Izno (talk) 20:27, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• White House from L (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Their most recently blocked sock was L, from O Block (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and they previously operated one called The White House from Faisalabad (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). White House from L added a picture to Zartaj Gul, and L, from O Block did the same. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Blocked and tagged. Closing. Spicy (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Rehan BeeH (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

There were Alpha rehan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Sig ma rehan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Rehan Chairman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and now this Rehan BeeH. RB added images to Changaiz Ahmed Khan Kakar, similar to what the previously confirmed sock MP, from Capital, had done. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 22:55, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spicy @Izno @RoySmith Sorry to bother you, If anyone of you are available, can you please run a CU as they now started moving pages similar to their previous sock. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:03, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Likely/tallyho to previous/each other
  • Rehan BeeH (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Pakistan Muslim League (N) (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Abid Sher Ali (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  In the future, consider reporting sufficiently obvious disruptive sockpuppetry to AIV rather than pinging people. Izno (talk) 19:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Rehan Shahid Yaseen (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Looks like they are back with similar type username of thirrecently blocked sock named Rehan BeeH with similar interest of editing articles related mostly to Pakistani politics if you look at their contributions [4] and account is created just two days after Rehan BeeH was blocked 202.59.13.82 (talk) 13:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Confirmed. Blocked and tagged. Drmies (talk) 13:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---