Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DavidWood11/Archive
DavidWood11
DavidWood11 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
04 February 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Satdul (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Same idiosyncrasies and same interest around Indian news media. For example, compare Special:Diff/1069308399 with Special:Diff/1049495336 or Special:Diff/1069422692 with Special:Diff/1049512570. Previously block evaded with 14.139.114.213 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) Tayi Arajakate Talk 09:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Girth Summit, just one question. You mean user Lelemera (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), right? Tayi Arajakate Talk 14:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- CU won't allow me to connect this back to DavidWood11, but I suspect it is them from the editing pattern. They are Confirmed them to Lelemer, so this is certainly block evasion. Blocking, closing. Girth Summit (blether) 11:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, shoot - yes, I meant Lelemera. I made the same mistake in the tag too - will fix... Girth Summit (blether) 15:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
02 April 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- LodoVena (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) ( Clerk note: original case name)
- Kichupila (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Same edits at Arvind Kejriwal with the same edit summary. Same topic areas for editing. Both started editing because of The Kashmir Files kerfuffle. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- Well crap. Thanks for the hard work. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 03:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Confirmed plus the following accounts:
- Jikocheni12 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Mouijumo (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Kopumila (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Satdul (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Lelemera (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Satdul and Lelemera were previously blocked as sockpuppets of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DavidWood11. All accounts Blocked and tagged. Clerk assistance requested: Please merge this case under DavidWood11. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:15, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Merged as requested. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
13 April 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Ddd421 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Anatoli eye (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Lelemera (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Lelemera is already blocked as a sock of DavidWood11, but by adding that account to the list, it gets added to Editor Interaction Utility.
Ddd421 is an account created to remove stuff unfavourable to the BJP (the political party of the Indian government). It does not behave like a new account. Its main actions, so far, have been to attempt to get two articles deleted:
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attack on Delhi Chief Minister's house
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tek Fog (2nd nomination)
The first AFD for Tek Fog: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tek Fog was started by Lelemera (confirmed sock of DavidWood11)
Anatoli eye is another new account, which appears to be linked to Ddd421 (though I do not know if they are a sock or a meat puppet). Their first edit was this one to support the AFD of Attack on Delhi Chief Minister's house Even though it is a "new" account, they can cite policies in their first post!
Both Ddd421 and Anatoli eye have collaborated on Draft:Gorakhnath temple attack - revision history -- Toddy1 (talk) 10:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC) -- Toddy1 (talk) 10:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 14:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Confirmed -- RoySmith (talk) 14:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
11 June 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Ghodbunder (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Ipdesign1 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
- talk page behaviour similar to previous socks
- same argument against The Wire as before, misinterpreting the same RSN discussion. Other socks have also extensively tried to litigate The Wire's reliability.
- Similar fast-typing errors - compare this edit and the edit summary from Ghodbunder to older sock's edit and master's edit summary. Hemantha (talk) 13:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Compare this rant from Ipdesign1 to this old one from a sock. Hemantha (talk) 15:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Confirmed No sleepers immediately visible -- RoySmith (talk) 22:00, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
28 June 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Nalasopara (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
- DavidWood11's sock Special:Contributions/Ghodbunder was blocked on 19 June by RoySmith.
- Nalasopara was created on 19 June.
- Both Nalasopara and Ghodbunder vandalized the BLP of opposition politicians in India. A trait also shown by past socks like Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/DavidWood11/Archive#13_April_2022. The new sock Nalasopara is blocked for similar type of WP:NOTHERE behavior.
I can see some more behavior similarities, but I believe this should be enough for CU to establish sockpuppetry and look for other socks by the master. Venkat TL (talk) 10:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you @Abecedare and RoySmith Venkat TL (talk) 13:47, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- The name itself is a dead giveaway. "Ghodbunder" and "Nala Sopara" are two locations in the west Maharashtra and are close to each other. REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 11:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- In progress - -- RoySmith (talk) 13:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Confirmed No sleepers immediately visible -- RoySmith (talk) 13:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
02 July 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Pasthal (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Last confirmed sock was blocked on 28 by RoySmith. This new created on 29. Similar ranting and WP:NOTHERE behavior like all other socks. CU needed for other socks. Venkat TL (talk) 11:03, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Confirmed -- RoySmith (talk) 12:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
06 July 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Talasari (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
New sock, already checked and blocked. This is for archive. Venkat TL (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Pre-archiving note: this was marked as closed by the filer [1]. @Venkat TL: Generally, marking cases as "closed" should only be done by clerks and administrators. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
07 September 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Maduadih (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Created after last sock Talasari was blocked. Continues to obsessively edit Talk:The Wire (India) and NDTV with negative information. Diffs [2] vs [3] Venkat TL (talk) 07:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I do not know whether Maduadih is a sock of DavidWood11, but I think there is enough evidence to justify using checkuser. He/she has similar interests to socks of DavidWood11. There are differences between the kind of edits that DavidWood11's LodoVena sock did to NDTV,[4][5][6] than the kind listed below by a group of editors who all seem to have had exactly the same opinion.
11:28, 4 June 2022 Ipdesign1 confirmed sock of DavidWood11
- 19:43, 10 July 2022 Jainil Prajapati
- 16:00 & 16:02, 16 July 2022 TheGlobalEditor
- 18:10 & 18:13, 16 July 2022 TheGlobalEditor
- 06:26, 6 August 2022 Shivam Kumar 766
- 12:00, 24 August 2022 Maduadih
- 16:01 & 16:08, 24 August 2022 Maduadih
-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- In progress - Girth Summit (blether) 16:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Confirmed to various confirmed socks. No unblocked accounts visible. Closing. Girth Summit (blether) 16:52, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
13 September 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Bommai123 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Though the talk page is different this time but the pattern is same.[7][8] Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 22:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Bommai123 (talk · contribs) is Confirmed to Maduadih (talk · contribs), an account that is already confirmed as a sock of DavidWood11 and blocked under this case. Can a clerk decide whether to tag? EdJohnston (talk) 19:53, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Tagged, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 20:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
23 September 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Bijiigil (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Created a day after block. [9] Personal attacks on me like old socks [10] [11]. Venkat TL (talk) 13:19, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ping @EdJohnston: --Venkat TL (talk) 13:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Bijiigil (talk · contribs) is Unlikely to Maduadih (talk · contribs) based on geolocation (They are editing from different countries). Behavior could be investigated further. Since Bijiigil has made only four edits we don't have much to go on. EdJohnston (talk) 14:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- I wouldn't be surprised if this was a sock of someone but I don't think the technical or behavioural evidence is sufficient to connect them to DavidWood11. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 23:56, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Post archive comment - noting for the record that I just blocked Bijiigil as a confirmed sock of Atheist kerala. Girth Summit (blether) 18:25, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
07 October 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Jinnah47 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
attacking me [12], edit warring [13]. Same as last sock Gidua (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Created after Gidua is blocked. Venkat TL (talk) 09:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- In progress - Girth Summit (blether) 13:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Confirmed to Gidua, amongst others. Also the following sleepers:
- Zingo514 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Kt514 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Zillaadgodda (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Will block etc. Girth Summit (blether) 13:15, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
21 October 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Kenstar1234 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Pelab tohara ke (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
[14] Kenstar1234 continues to attack me. On the same article as his last 3 socks and immediately after the last sock was blocked, yesterday. Venkat TL (talk) 20:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Pelab tohara ke returns to his favourite article Wire. --Venkat TL (talk) 20:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
User:Blablubbs I have not attacked Venkat TL. I have only shown one of his edit difference which is entirely opposing his argument on a poll that is now being reverted by himself. I have no relation with this DavidWood11. I endorse any investigation regarding this.Thanks.Kenstar1234 (talk) 04:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Pelab is Confirmed to Jinnah47 (among others), Blocked and tagged. Kenstar1234 is Possible at best, but arguably less than that. I'd be interested in both behavioural and technical second opinions for that one. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:49, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with Blabb's CU results, and don't see anything in the edit histories that makes me think sock. Closing with no further action. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
22 October 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Mojata12 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
[15] back to his favorite article after recent sock above was blocked. Username similar to previous incarnation Jikocheni12 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Venkat TL (talk) 18:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Mojata12 Confirmed -- RoySmith (talk) 21:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
23 October 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Zubair8547 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
[16] redoing last sock. Venkat TL (talk) 10:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Fairly Likely. No sleepers immediately visible. Blocked and tagged. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
26 October 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Saforraa burger (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Same interest as before [17], created right after last block. Tayi Arajakate Talk 08:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Confirmed. Blocked and tagged. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 08:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
29 October 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
- Alexandria Bucephalous (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Created just 10 days ago.
Calling "The Wire" an unreliable source on Talk:The Wire,[18][19] and making unexplained reverts.[20][21] Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 10:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Somewhere between Possible and Unlikely -- RoySmith (talk) 14:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
30 September 2024
Suspected sockpuppets
- Kittonttoxin (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ND61F (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TheKunda (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- DwilfaStudwell (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- BlackOrchidd (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Pro forma. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Confirmed to each other and to Kt514 from the archive. Blocked and tagged. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
28 November 2024
Suspected sockpuppets
- Rajat Sharma IndiaTV (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- SasuraBAdaPAisawala (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Bajajkunior (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Djano Chained (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dopacane (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dzień dobrry (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Lullipedia (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- MCA1E23P0O12 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Oo Vikram Sampath (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Peluddin mohammad (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Phonomannoba (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TracyVaghmare91 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ZandraBlaese (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Zubehamoreha (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Hemacho328wsa (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Pro forma, see below. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Drmies found most of these, I'm filing because they need a fresh set of tags per Special:Permalink/1260076343#User conduct and that's easier this way. Essentially Confirmed, for the record. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
30 November 2024
Suspected sockpuppets
- Zkty2s67 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
[22]. C F A 19:47, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Now blocked, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 20:40, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
07 December 2024
Suspected sockpuppets
- Upd Edit (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Clearly not a new user, they made their first edits on the talkpage of ANI vs WMF open letter like the last set of socks such as Djano Chained[23], Zubehamoreha [24] and TracyVaghmare91 [25]. Zubehamoreha posted the latest news update in the section 'Note from Jimbo', Upd Edit posted in the same section about a similar news update. [26] and like the last few socks such as Phonomannoba[27], Lullipedia[28] and Dopacane[29] they are also a single purpose account solely dedicated to promoting hindutva narrative on Sambhal Mosque issue [30][31]. They are also involved in a heated content dispute with Aliyiya5903 on Shahi Jama Masjid, DavidWood11's previous sock Lullipedia also reported Aliyiya5903 to ANI [32] after having a content dispute with them on the same issue on 2024 Sambhal Violence. DavidWood11 socks and Upd Edit were previously brought to ANI over socking suspicions [33][34], Same old forumshopping [35][36].- Ratnahastin (talk) 10:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Nonsense. I have no idea about these accounts, my political inclinations are as distant from Hindutva as possible, and I challenge Ratnahastin to find a single edit where I have misrepresented a source. If I had much sympathy for the Hindutva-vadis, I, for certain, won't have bothered to add details about a previous lawsuit where "the witness for the Hindu side were noted to be of a 'poor quality'" or talk about Hindutva-driven persecution of Muslims?
In Indian media (incl. the diaspora), the Wikipedia/GOI tussle and the Sambhal Mosque has drawn / been drawing significant coverage across media. So, new editors are to be expected. That Aliyiya5903 reverted my edits, edit-warred, and opened a spurious ANI thread (where Kautilya3 notes that their edits were so disruptive that he thought about taking them to Arbitration Enforcement Noticeboard but chose to gave them a last chance!) just as they might have done with other editors do not imply that we are socks; else, Aliyiya5903 can go on targeting others and upon being reverted, claim collusion/socking!
Ratnahastin knows the truth as well and is merely hoping to win a content dispute by laying bogus socking charges. And that I am having a favorable editorial interaction with Kautilya3, who was also accused to be my sock at the ANI discussion, requesting him to take a look at this SPI doesn't "forum-shopping" make.Upd Edit (talk) 11:52, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I primarily edit from Ontario and depending on work load, through a workstation premised at a Nordic university. However, while I have spent close to a decade in N.A., I am not a native speaker. Thanks, Upd Edit (talk) 14:14, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Unrelated. I don't think Upd Edit is DavidWood11. They are editing from completely different locations, and while there is some behavioral overlap, I feel that Upd Edit's writing style demonstrates a native understanding of English, whereas the socks of DavidWood11 have frequent spelling/grammatical errors, e.g. [37][38]. Closing without action. Mz7 (talk) 04:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
11 December 2024
Suspected sockpuppets
- Zhwiki2943 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dmitri2025 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Created after the last set of socks were blocked. Similar broken english [39][40], personal attacks [41]. And whitewashing articles related to Indian news organisations [42][43][44] [45][46], making references to 'defamation' [47][48][49][50] - Ratnahastin (talk) 02:12, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Dmitri2025 is a newly registered account that has appeared out of nowhere to support zhwiki's viewpoint on the talkpage [51]. - Ratnahastin (talk) 09:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Zhwiki2943 looks like Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Blaxstocatamazon. Dmitri2025 doesn't have the same indicators as Zhwiki2943 but does have some others that indicate a connection to Blaxstocatamazon. I'll block both, wiki for results + behavior and Dmitri for behavior (meatpuppetry if not plain socking). Izno (talk) 23:11, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe merits a move also, clerk should consider that. (See also the discussion that Zzuuzz has been entertaining by their lonesome currently in the Blaxstocatamazon archives.) Izno (talk) 23:13, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
18 December 2024
Suspected sockpuppets
- Madarsa Chhap (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Posting on the talkpage of Asian News International about the ongoing lawsuit like past socks such as Zubehamoreha , Dzień dobrry [52] [53] - Ratnahastin (talk) 05:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Madarsa Chhap is Confirmed to DIG41201. Found Bakri Lover, also confirmed. Blocked and tagged. Closing. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 17:07, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
20 December 2024
Suspected sockpuppets
- Just another bakri lover (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Same username as the last sock (Bakri Lover) and interest in the same area (ANI vs WMF lawsuit). - Ratnahastin (talk) 14:45, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Already blocked. I did look and they're on the right range to be either DW or Blax. Izno (talk) 18:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC)