This is a page for working on arbitration decisions. The arbitrators, parties to the case, and other editors may draft proposals and post them to this page for review and comments. Proposals may include proposed general principles, findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement provisions—the same format as is used in Arbitration Committee decisions. The bottom of the page may be used for overall analysis of the /Evidence and for general discussion of the case.

Any user may edit this workshop page. Please sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they believe should be part of the final decision on the /Proposed decision page, which only arbitrators may edit, for voting.

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

2)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

3)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

2)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

3)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

4)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

1) Wikipedia users are expected to behave reasonably in their dealings with other users and to observe the principles of assuming good faith, civility, and the writers' rules of engagement. If disputes arise, users are expected to use dispute resolution procedures instead of making personal attacks.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed. MaxSem 06:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2) Editing in a manner so as to intentionally provoke other editors is a form of trolling and goes against established Wikipedia policies, as well as the spirit of Wikipedia and the will of its editors.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Note. Kirill Lokshin 19:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

why is this proposed in that RfA? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by others:

3) Use of Wikipedia to harass other editors is prohibited. Harassment is an ongoing pattern of participation with no legitimate editorial purpose that intimidates another user or seeks to drive another user away from the project.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Note. Kirill Lokshin 19:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

why is this proposed in that RfA? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by others:

4) Wikipedia users are expected to behave reasonably and calmly in their dealings with other users. Insulting and intimidating other users harms the community by creating a hostile environment. Personal attacks are not acceptable.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Note. Kirill Lokshin 19:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

why is this proposed in that RfA? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by others:

5) Otherwise valuable users who engage in sustained patterns of disruptive behavior may be briefly banned for each incident.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 19:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

why shall someone get blocked for disrupting admin right abuses? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by others:

6) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

7) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

1) Tobias_Conradi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Tobias_Conradi (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

2) Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Tobias Conradi, Wikipedia:Community_sanction_noticeboard/Archive7#User:Tobias_Conradi, Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive82#Tobias_Conradi, deleted user page Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tobias Conradi. Earlier material Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tobias Conradi/admin right abuse, [1]

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 19:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

3) There has been an ongoing controversy regarding Tobias_Conradi's moves, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Tobias_Conradi/Evidence#Controversial_moves_without_first_seeking_consensus Examination of the moves show them to be generally well founded; however, there is often resistance to his choices [2]. With respect to that particular edit, see poll and discussion of move and reversion, note the acrimonious tone. Giano, 2005.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 19:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

4) Moves, especially when disambiguation pages are used rather than simple redirects, may result in many broken links. Tobias Conradi has been rather obtuse regarding this problem, insisting that clearing up such problem are not his responsibility [3]. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Tobias_Conradi/Evidence#Editors_asking_Tobias_to_fix_the_wiki_links_broken_by_him_moving_pages_around.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 18:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

please show where I left any "broken links". If there are one or two cases out of 1000 where I did not fix double redirects, I am sorry for this. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 17:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by others:

5) According to Tobias Conradi, "There is a whole culture of corruption and admin rights abuse.", see Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Tobias_Conradi/admin_right_abuse and the contents of the deleted page, User:Tobias Conradi/admin right abuse.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 18:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

6) Tobias Conradi is sometimes quite rude. Called on his behavior, he habitually responds with a rejoinder of some sort, see Talk:Jambi and Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Tobias_Conradi/Evidence#Incivility, a particularly egregious example.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 17:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

7) User talk:Tobias Conradi/RfA

Comment by Arbitrators:

Note Fred Bauder 18:34, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

8) At times Tobias Conradi adopts a posture of not being aware of common Wikipedia conventions [4].

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 18:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

9) Tobias Conradi has engaged in edit warring over trivial matters [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. His position was apparently that it was the responsibility of other editors to "fix" the page title.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 18:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

Completely nonsense. Sorry Fred. "His position was apparently that it was the responsibility of other editors to "fix" the page title." how do yu come to htis conclusion? I did insert a redirect with possibilites. That's it. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by others:

8) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

8) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

8) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

v

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

1) Tobia Conradi may be blocked up to an hour by any administrator for any personal attack or violation of civility. Blocks need not be logged.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 19:00, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

2) Tobias Conradi is limited to one revert per week on any article.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 19:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

why is this proposed? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by others:

3) Tobias Conradi is prohibited from maintaining laundry lists of grievance.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 19:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

Tobias never had "Laundry lists of grievances". He only made admin actions transparent . Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by others:

5) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

6) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

7) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

8) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

9) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

1) Should Tobias Conradi violate any ban or prohibition imposed by this decision, he may be blocked by any administrator for up to one hour. Blocks need not be logged.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Proposed Fred Bauder 19:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

3) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

4) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

5) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

Tobias_Conradi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Tobias_Conradi (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[10] [11]

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Wikipedia:Community_sanction_noticeboard/Archive7#User:Tobias_Conradi Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive82#Tobias_Conradi

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

deleted user page Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tobias Conradi. Earlier material Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tobias Conradi/admin right abuse [12]

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Tobias Conradi

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others: