Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 3

February 3

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 3, 2025.

Ministry of of Information, Culture, and Tourism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:46, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The extra "of" makes this implausible, and its creation by a pagemove makes it ineligible for R3. Not surprisingly, it gets virtually zero pageviews. Nyttend (talk) 23:34, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kekius Maximus

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 11#Kekius Maximus

MAGA civil war

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Views of Elon Musk#Immigration. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:48, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Civil war of any kind not mentioned in target. I believe this is meant to refer to the dispute over skilled immigration within the right wing recently, where Musk and other right-wing tech executives came out in favor. This isn't discussed on the page either. Rusalkii (talk) 23:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not mentioned at the target. CNC (talk) 23:10, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Appelsina

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:48, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Icelandic word for orange. Not mentioned in target, delete per WP:RLANG as oranges do not have any affinity with Iceland. Rusalkii (talk) 22:54, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nuevo Criollo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:36, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Team in the league. Not mentioned in target. Rusalkii (talk) 22:37, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rojo (baseball)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Also modified the template and other incoming links to pipe to the suggested Rojo (baseball team) instead. Jay 💬 18:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. I'm not sure which of several "Rojo"s associated with Cuban baseball are intended here. Julio Rojo seems like the most obvious, but there's a several other (non-Cuban) "Rojo"s in baseball, as well as a whole basketful of "Rojos"s. Per the tags this is meant to be a baseball team, which I believe was the Los Rojos. Propose to delete or disambiguate. Rusalkii (talk) 22:25, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's talking about the defunct baseball team from Cuba, which is listed in sources as Rojo, not Los Rojos. After the creation of the page, it showed that 44 pages already had links to it, so it is obvious to everyone who the subject of the redirect is. I can disambiguate to Rojo (Cuban baseball team) if that floats your boat. BittersweetParadox (talk) 04:00, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the incoming links are generated from Template:Cuban_League_teams, but I take the point that's being used. I'd prefer a disambiguation that clarifies it's a team (just "baseball team" would be adequate), though that still doesn't resolve the issue of it not being mentioned in the target. Rusalkii (talk) 05:16, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Bear Lake Murders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:48, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target (and shouldn't be). Possibly notable? Rusalkii (talk) 22:19, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mayor in of Niagara Falls, Ontario

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. The redirect was speedily deleted by Pppery per R3. (non-admin closure) Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:28, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"in of" seems like an unlikely error. Rusalkii (talk) 22:13, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i just realized i made this error. i suggest speedy delete. i apologize. Rushtheeditor (talk) 22:15, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged for speedy deletion for you. Duckmather (talk) 01:56, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Anatoly Karlin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Further discussions about the content of the article can be discussed at the article's talk page. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 12:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Author seems to no longer be associated with the website when you attempt to look up him in the author tab. And notability seems to only be supported by like two sources, nothing else. 2601:586:5300:E340:A94A:EF4E:4328:ED81 (talk) 22:02, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This IP is an obvious WP:Sock. Karlin is a well known far-right extremist and anti-Semite blogger. There are 187 pages dedicated to Anatoly Karlin live at the UNZ Review. On the UNZ Review Wikipedia article there is a peer-reviewed paper that mentions Karlin [1] which says he is a "promoter of antisemitic conspiracy theories and associates with alt-right political activist Richard Spencer". So this is well sourced content. Veg Historian (talk) 23:47, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Last post was 2023. You are not addressing whether he is still active on the website. 76.153.136.50 (talk) 23:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Both IPs co-geolocate. Seems to me that significant past activity on the website justifies keeping the redirect, unless the person has repudiated that past activity, and this repudiation is reliably sourced. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:58, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    "Both IPs co-geolocate" I don't use a static ip thank you. 76.153.136.50 (talk) 23:59, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The IP that filed this has been blocked. I am not convinced this was filed in good-faith; the same people behind these drive-by IPs have been at this for a while. Off-site myself and several other users are currently been harassed/targeted by the Human Diversity Foundation and their far-right associates. The WMF know the details about this and it is not something I can talk about here but it looks like this was another WP:Hound attempt to stir drama. Veg Historian (talk) 01:03, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Just to note, the blocked IP that filed this and 76.153 have both been editing this same draft [2]. There is no doubt this is the same person/group behind these IPS, so WP:MEATPUPPETRY is confirmed. It's probably worth closing this. Veg Historian (talk) 01:08, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    First, I left The Unz Review in 2021, not 2023. Second, the anti-Semitism/Richard Spencer claims about me are fictitious and come from an obscure paper by an obscure academic, and are themselves originally sourced from the RationalWiki page on me. That RationalWiki page happens to have been primarily written by this very individual who I am replying to, and who has also engaged in a years-long online harassment campaign against me (I can prove this with links to the relevant investigations on request). This individual is not a disinterested party on this topic. SublimeWik (talk) 22:09, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep until/unless there is consensus to remove Karlin from the target page: notability isn't a requirement for redirects and neither is being currently associated with the target. Rusalkii (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Since Karlin isn't independently notable, but is a possible search term for readers, having a redirect to the notable publication most connected to him makes perfect sense, particularly since it's to the specific section in the article that would be relevant. I see no reason why such a redirect should be deleted. SilverserenC 00:52, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment How do we account for the opinions of User:SublimeWik who claims that they are this individual? Many comments here are casting aspersions to a fellow editor. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The one comment above that you'd be referring to is just quoting from reliable sources. This published academic article states: The Unz Review is a White nationalist website which regularly publishes antisemitic writers who deny the Holocaust (e.g., Striker, 2020), extreme anti-immigration screeds based on racist stereotypes (e.g., Boehm, 2020), and other forms of hate speech (“California Entrepreneur . . .,” 2018; Duehren & Thompson, 2016; Shekhovtsov, 2018; Sixsmith, 2018). Sailer is a political writer who uses the language of IQ and genetics to further a White nationalist political agenda (MacDougald & Willick, 2017; Saini, 2019, pp. 87–91). Karlin is a similar figure who promotes antisemitic conspiracy theories and associates with alt-right political activist Richard Spencer (Murphy, 2019).
The Murphy article it links to further states The article in question, which purports to examine the reasons for the comparative economic disadvantage suffered by African nations, frequently slips into implicit endorsements of eugenics. Arguing against an “egalitarian understanding of humanity”, O’Dwyer Connolly attributes the inability of third-world nations to escape the cycle of poverty to “genetic inheritance”.
More troublingly still, the article credits Anatoly Karlin, a well known member of the Russian far right who has appeared at events alongside American white nationalist Richard Spencer, as the source of many of the ideas expressed in the piece. Its argument is unabashedly racist, and the attribution of the ideas espoused in the piece to Karlin betrays the troubling ideology that now influences the paper’s content and outlook.
It isn't an aspersion to quote from reliable sources as an argument for why it's relevant to keep the redirect, due to the subject's relevance to the article itself. SilverserenC 06:57, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The University Times (Murphy) is a student newspaper of dubious credibility that incidentally mentioned me as part of an ideologized hit piece on another person. The source Murphy used was evidently RationalWiki, since it was the only "publication" to refer to my participation at "events" with Richard Spencer at the time it was written. (In reality, I only met Spencer once and never participated in any joint projects). Its subsequent citation by Jackson Jr., and then the citation of both on RationalWiki and Jackson Jr. on Wikipedia, is a classic example of citogenesis.
Ultimately I do not mind my name redirecting to The Unz Review for the time being but only so long as the article on The Unz Review is rewritten for fairness and balance as I explained here. SublimeWik (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've made this edit at The Unz Review: [3]. That, I think, satisfies the WP:BLP issues raised by SublimeWik, and I think that removes the last barrier raised so far in this discussion, to keeping the redirect. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe it does. As I noted, the article has severe overall issues with balance.
And even your edit included a detail whose notability and relevance I fail to understand ("while noting his "respect and appreciation" for Ron Unz"). SublimeWik (talk) 21:16, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The issue here is whether to keep or delete the redirect. And there seems to be an emerging consensus to keep it. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I think the following observations are germane to this discussion: (1) This redirect was implemented by @Veg Historian on April 22, 2024 a month after I submitted a request to rewrite The Unz Review article for balance and accuracy; (2) It happened a day after @IntoThinAir - the creator of the article - initiated a sockpuppetry investigation, presumably with the aim of getting my one and only account here banned (Veg Historian, then posting as Psychologist_Guy, subsequently joined that discussion thread with personal attacks); (3) The Veg Historian/Psychologist_Guy account has a verified record of editing the RationalWiki article about me, which another Wikipedia editor has acknowledged "is an egregious attack page (as many of their biographies are) that would be swiftly deleted if it were ever created here." Consequently, I submit that the redirect was not something done to improve Wikipedia, but to pursue a well-documented personal vendetta. Otherwise, as noted above, I am open to leaving the redirect, but only on condition that The Unz Review article is rewritten for balance and noteworthiness to substantively address the criticisms I raised on its Talk pages by a credibly neutral third-party editor.
SublimeWik (talk) 14:07, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, they were indefinitely blocked in an Oversight block. But they are not wrong about there being an ongoing feud/dispute, which we have seen going on on in this discussion and on ANI, between the redirect creator and the redirect subject. I think there is a clear COI here but I'm not sure how that is valued at RFD. I've run into this at AFDs but not RFDs. Liz Read! Talk! 06:13, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If the argument is that someone else should have created the redirect, I'll happily assume responsibility for it myself. But I fail to see any logic behind claiming that we should have content about Karlin at the Unz page, but if readers put Karlin's name into the search box, that won't help them find it. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:12, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete "Not discussed with enough substance to warrant a redirect" is probably what I would say in normal times here. And definitely not discussed with enough substance to override WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:04, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    What the BLP subject actually requested, before being blocked for violating the harassment policy, was that the content at The Unz Review reflect the fact that he had broken with the Review, and he says explicitly above that he had no objection to the redirect, if the content at the target were fixed to his liking. After he was blocked, I made changes that, in what I think is an NPOV way, include what he had requested (that he subsequently published comments disagreeing with the positions taken at Unz), and actually goes a step further (by noting his endorsement of Harris over Trump). So, based on what he has told us, there is no longer any BLP issue with the content at the target page, and I think BLPREQUEST no longer applies. He is included in the content at the target page, where there are independent secondary sources cited as indicating his significance to the page subject, and it's the only place readers will find out about him at Wikipedia, so I don't see any BLP value in making it harder for readers to find him. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:12, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Tryptofish's comment. It would appear that the BLP issues that might justify deletion were resolved. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:18, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikiepdia.org

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:49, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While this is technically mentioned in the target (it's the example image), I don't think anyone is entering this search term hoping for information on the concept of typosquatting. Either delete, or retarget to match wikipedia.org. Rusalkii (talk) 21:00, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Wikipedia and tag as {{R from typo}}. I agree with nom, it is very unlikely they are actively looking for the typosquatting article with this redirect, and landing there will provoke WP:ASTONISHment for sure... granted, they'd probably get it after a few seconds of thought if they doublecheck what they typed. But still, they almost certainly want to get to the wikipedia article page. Fieari (talk) 05:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

San Francisco cable car systim

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:49, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Empirically unlikely typo - the full title occurs nowhere on the internet, and "cable car systim" exactly once. e and i are not near each other on the keyboard and "system" is a common word. Rusalkii (talk) 20:46, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bundled several additional related typo redirects. Note that I approved the related San Fransisco cable car system and San Francisco cabel car system, as typos that actually occur in the wild. 20:49, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Centennial High School (Maryland)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep (or, rather, the article was uncontroversially moved to this location making the RFD discussion redundant).  — Amakuru (talk) 22:02, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This Centennial High School in Ellicott City is the only high school in the state. Sparkbean (talk) 17:58, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

US–Canada relations during Trump's second presidency

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Canada–United States relations#Justin Trudeau and Donald Trump (January 2025 – present). ✗plicit 14:21, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is also the current trade war that makes this current target not the full scope of POTUS "relationship" with Canada since it does not include Canada–United States trade relations. Retarget elsewhere. -1ctinus📝🗨 13:22, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Thee Movie011

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 10#Thee Movie011

Can You Feel the Beat: The Lisa Lisa Story

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was turned to article. Jay 💬 14:54, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the redirected page is a made-for-TV film by Lifetime. It redirects to the television channel article; however, the target article has no information/mention about the redirected subject, nor does the target article include a list of its films. The "comprehensive list" linked in the #Films section is the category page of Lifetime films that have Wikipedia articles. This redirect to the TV channel article should be deleted. Pyxis Solitary (yak). Ol' homo. ⚢ 12:10, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a recent film that has some coverage. I just watched and came here to read about it, but saw the redirect message. I would like to create this page. No need for redirect. I will be working on it.
https://www.usmagazine.com/entertainment/news/can-you-feel-the-beat-trailer-details-lisa-lisas-ups-and-downs-watch/
https://deadline.com/2024/10/lisa-lisa-cult-jam-lisa-velez-lifetime-biopic-jearnest-corchado-1236158754/
https://hotchka.com/can-you-feel-the-beat-the-lisa-lisa-story-review
https://www.vulture.com/article/lisa-lisa-lifetime-can-you-feel-the-beat.html Goodboyjj (talk) 07:07, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have completed the page now, so this redirect discussion can be removed and closed. Goodboyjj (talk) 07:28, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Magibon.com

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No mention at the article, and the only provided background links were not RSs. Given the WP:BLP issues in highlighting a stalker's website, deletion is preferred. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:19, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. magibon.com doesn't seem to be an official website. (NPP action) jlwoodwa (talk) 02:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:04, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, not mentioned at the target, nor is any mention of a stalker. (And even if added, it wouldn't be a particularly useful redirect, as a normal search would still catch this, and it's kind of overly specific and unlikely over the main article title anyway). 35.139.154.158 (talk) 14:14, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Melodic rock

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 11#Melodic rock

Sunnyside Park

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 11#Sunnyside Park

Jews did 9/11 + Jews did WTC

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep * Pppery * it has begun... 17:58, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to 9/11 conspiracy theories#Antisemitism in conspiracy theories, as the redirects are about Jewish people, not Israel. 70.19.93.148 (talk) 12:42, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The original nomination was malformed, and I have fixed it. I have no opinion on the redirects up for discussion. mwwv converse∫edits 14:51, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My initial rationale for targeting it to the Israel section instead of the antisemitism one was though I've pointed them at #Israel instead, as that's a section above and covers more conspiracy theories related to Jews. The two sections are short and next to each other; pointing to #Israel allows you to see both sections on screen at the same time. at least on desktop. (This was initially an AFC/R request.) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 19:16, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirects need not be neutral, and these are tagged with {{R from non-neutral name}} with the target being an article on specifically conspiracy theories about 9/11. The redirects get 8 and 10 views a month, respectively. I personally don't see a good argument for deletion. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The September 11 attacks were performed by Muslims, not Jews. style="color #964b00 Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 01:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Skarmory's rationale, above. And yes, it was not done by Jews, but there are antisemetic conspiracy theories regardless (because antisemetism naturally attracts irrational idiocy like this) so if someone is looking for information on it, we should educate them swiftly and thoroughly. Fieari (talk) 04:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:58, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Anti-semitic nonsense. LarryL33k (Contribz) 22:22, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or I guess retarget, no strong feelings about which section it should go to, but deleting redirects for being anti-semetic nonsense just makes it harder for people to find the rebuttal to it. Both of these seem to get the occasional trickle of hits, so they're not useless. Rusalkii (talk) 00:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Unfortunately a very popular phrase, but with an obvious encyclopedic target so WP:RNEUTRAL applies here. Current section seems fine as it's the first of two and the only one that actually has more mentions of alleged Jewish involvement (the other section seems to be mostly about noting that these were rooted in antisemitism). Perhaps merging them and remaining the section might be appropriate as well. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:01, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gray Jedi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic#Alignment system. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:56, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no information about so-called "gray Jedi" in the Jedi article. Such information has been deleted from the article by consensus multiple times due to notability and sourcing concerns. Delete. T.Y. Faltermeyer (talk) 00:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per Jay. This is sort of a fan term, but it has a practical implementation in KOTOR (balancing light/dark gives a character a gray aura), so it makes sense there's a mention there. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:pp

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. This nomination is disruptive. (non-admin closure) Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 16:15, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this sexualized redirect as offensive or abusive. I saw {{pp|small=yes}} at the top of an article and it reminded me of WP:X1 and Wikipedia:Complete bollocks. 173.206.40.108 (talk) 06:34, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

KWHY-TV

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 10#KWHY-TV

Quelle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025_February_3