The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Aptos (typeface)#History. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (u — c) 19:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Grandview (typeface) → DIN 1451  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• Skeena (typeface) → Microsoft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• Seaford (typeface) → Microsoft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

These redirects point to articles where there is no mention of the subject at the target. They are similar to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Tenorite (typeface). My opinion is to delete as Enwiki appears to have no substantive material about them, but the decision should be consistent with the result of the other RfD. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget all to Aptos (typeface)#History, where all three are discussed-- the article tells you what they are, why they were important, what happened to them, and even where you can get them now, which in total is information I'd find substantive. As I mention in the one for Tenorite, an alternative might be to delete as per WP:REDLINK to encourage article creation; however, I'm not sure they're notable enough for their own articles. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per Lunamann. Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 19:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Thryduulf (talk) 13:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Bumping trains → Fare evasion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in the article, nothing in wikt:bumping. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:35, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, potentially add mention: Apparently, this is a decently well-known term for evading train/subway fare. https://www.mylondon.news/lifestyle/travel/london-train-expert-explains-youd-26292881 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:02, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete so long as it isn't mentioned. Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 19:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no mention of the word "bump" or "bumping" at the target article. The redirect has zero valuable history so nothing will be lost upon deletion. The title can always be recreated when material is added, which doesn't even have to happen this year. There is no rush to improve the encyclopedia. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:08, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Question: How do we generally deal with slang terms? I suppose this one evolved out of "to bunk a train" (same meaning), which I can find attested since as early as 2002,[1] and which I'd guess exists since the 1980s or 90s. However, it does not seem like we have any redirects that involve this one. Wiktionary has no mention of this one either, even though it is still in use, as confirmed by a quick google search. I'd even say "to bunk" in this context is much more common than "to bump". -- In the meantime, I lean keep, per Lunamann. It seems to be a popular slang term, in use since the late 2010s,[2][3] and the redirect has been viewed 56 times this year.[4] Renerpho (talk) 06:23, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: it is a synonym. Synonyms do not need mention. Cremastra (u — c) 19:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  But I have added one. Cremastra (u — c) 19:36, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I would have !voted keep without a mention in this case. With a mention, it definitely needs to be kept. Fieari (talk) 07:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Now that the explanation had been added, we can apply WP:CHEAP. --Викидим (talk) 07:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Baseball glove. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (u — c) 19:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Catcher's mitt → Catcher's Mitt  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Originally targeted Baseball glove, but was retargeted without explanation in 2009. Seems a pretty obvious WP:DIFFCAPS case to me; suggest reverting to old target. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe) 08:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:14, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Baseball glove as the clear primary target for this title, and put a hatnote on both. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:13, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 19:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Baseball glove per nom and add a hatnote to Catcher's Mitt (there is already a suitable hatnote at Catcher's Mitt). A7V2 (talk) 00:57, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Baseball glove, add hatnote to current target just in case for our readers --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Baseball glove to avoid WP:ASTONISHment. I would not object to a hatnote. Fieari (talk) 01:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget and hatnote, per above. Note there was already a hatnote on Catcher's Mitt, but it was in the wrong place (under lead) and so was rendering incorrectly on mobile web - I've just fixed that. BugGhost🦗👻 08:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Restore and take to AfD. asilvering (talk) 02:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Mick Armstrong → Socialist Alternative (Australia)#History  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. TarnishedPath^talk 06:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the above and also per the fact that there are no sources that this is a prominent figure with serious connections to the target article. - AndreyKva (talk) 07:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore as a contested WP:BLAR. The article was tagged for notability, but it was well-developed with nine references so it definitely should not be deleted here. Another alternative would be to retarget to Austudy Five where he is mentioned, but really that should be an option presented at AfD if someone wants to take it there. Thryduulf (talk) 10:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Thryduulf, none of the sources at Austudy Five support that he was part of the event. Two of the sources are dead so they might have supported he was, however both of those (Green Left Weekly) are unreliable. The only reliable source on that article is The Age and it doesn't support it. That event itself might not pass WP:GNG as the only reliable sources I can only find are The Age article already in the article and three Crikey articles that look like they might be opinion pieces. TarnishedPath^talk 11:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The proposed target has also been proposed for deletion. Notified of this discussion there as well.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:32, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore for now per Thryduulf. Notability can be discussed at AfD. Felix QW (talk) 16:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore, article content should be considered at AfD Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 19:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore article per Thryduulf. Had many sources and existed for 11 years prior to being BLARed. A7V2 (talk) 00:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore then send to AfD as contested BLAR. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 21:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ronnie Cowan (rugy union) → Ronnie Cowan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This redirect has an interesting history—it was left over from a move to the target's base title back when it was still about the rugby player with that name, then that was moved to the correctly spelled Ronnie Cowan (rugby union) (a plausible title worth keeping) a minute later, and then the page at the base title was converted to a disambiguation page...while this redirect was never picked up and stayed pointing at the disambiguation page. I know pointing readers to a disambiguation page with this misspelled title isn't the right course of action, but I'm not sure what we should do with it—delete it or retarget it to Ronnie Cowan (rugby), or another route? Thoughts? Regards, SONIC678 06:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete since the correct version exists. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no point in misspelled directs while the correctly titled redirect definitely does. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 12:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete implausible typo. Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 19:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to malformed redirect --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Highly implausible misspelling. Partofthemachine (talk) 08:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Implausible typo that hardly anyone will type. Procyon117 (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 21:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Sidepiece (DJs) → Party Favor (DJ)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Music duo containing both Party Favor (DJ) and Nitti Gritti, both of which have articles. We can't have a redirect where two possible targets are the most logical. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, WP:REDYES. Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 19:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Queen of Hearts (and WP:RFD#D10), but if not deleted it would be much better targeted to Nitti Gritti#Biography, or better yet a new subsection, as it contains far more information about the duo than the current target does. A7V2 (talk) 01:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).