The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 18:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Edifiying The Ed-Ventures → Ed, Edd n Eddy#Merchandise  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Nominating this redirect for deletion as an implausible typo. — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 23:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Well it's not a typo, so much as an extraneous "The". Per Special:PageHistory/Edifying Ed-Ventures (DVD) (which is from before moves appeared in page histories), the page's creator corrected this error about 90 minutes after they made it. No one else seems to have ever made this exact mistake, so delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 01:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's specific enough of a title that I would think a search would be able to bring it up, or the automated suggestions list would do just fine. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 08:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong venue. @Hiroizmeh: You should file a Requested move. If there is consensus to move, the redirect will be deleted as a matter of course. If this were a noncontroversial request I would just action it for you right now, but David notMD's comment at Talk:Carotenosis makes clear that this is potentially controversial, and thus an RM is needed. Sorry for the bureaucracy. (non-admin closure) -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 03:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Carotenemia → Carotenosis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Need previously-edited redirect page "Carotenemia" deleted to move "Carotenoderma" to "Carotenemia" per:

"Carotenemia is the much more common name used to refer to the subject. In references, 'carotenemia' is used in the title 4/6 times, and in the text of the sources 95% of the time (100% of times in refs 1, 5, 6, 9; 29/38 times in ref 8, 13/14 times in ref 12), compared 'carotenoderma' being 4%, 'xanthoderma' being 17%, and 'carotenodermia' being 1%" Hiroizmeh (Talk | Contributions) 23:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Hiroizmeh: Carotenemia and Carotenoderma are both redirects to Carotenosis. Why should one redirect be moved to where the other is? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 01:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Oh, my mistake. I meant "Carotenosis" as in moving that to "Carotenemia" (first deleting the existing redirect page "Carotenemia" to make way for the page move). Hiroizmeh (Talk | Contributions) 01:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• January 18, 2008 (film) → Cloverfield  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I couldn't find information about it being a working title or alike. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 23:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unlikely for a film to be referenced by the day of its release, and other films were also released on the same day so somewhat WP:UNDUE. Bonoahx (talk) 23:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Bonoahx, this seems to be the only redirect of its kind ([release date] (film)) from what I've searched. Regards, SONIC678 02:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Stellar population#Population III stars. MBisanz ^talk 01:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Supermassive star → List of most massive stars  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Supermassive stars are a specific type of star theorised in recent years to have existed in the early universe (e.g. [1] ) which should have a page of their own; the wiki-link should not simply redirect to the list of *current* most massive stars observed Fig (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to supermassive black hole, and tag as {{r with possibilities}}. Supermassive stars have been discussed for decades as the source for quasars and supermassive black holes, so they are clearly a subtopic. Paradoctor (talk) 21:11, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • That'd be a bad idea. They are mostly unrelated. It should just go to those stars themselves, the Population III stars -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to stellar population#Population III star which is what this is referring to (the stars of the early universe) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. and WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 20:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It was WP:BLAR'd, then you'd need to revert to the time it was an article, and proceed from there -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not familiar with the topic, but looking at the original article it might be that this is the same thing as Population III star, but I note that the term isn't mentioned there. If it can be mentioned at stellar population#Population III star, then redirect there, otherwise restore and AfD. I will put a note on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. A7V2 (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Stellar_population#Population_III_stars. This hypothetical type of star can become far more massive because they have zero metallicity. They are (probably) unrelated to supermassive black holes, though have been proposed as a source of intermediate mass black holes that may have seeded the early growth of SMBHs. Modest Genius ^talk 15:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: So can we get a consensus to retarget to Stellar population#Population III stars?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Quasi-star, or retarget to Stellar population#Population III stars and tag as {{R with no mention}}. Jay (talk) 17:14, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Istory of rugby union matches between New Zealand and Wales → History of rugby union matches between New Zealand and Wales  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete. Unambiguously created in error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Someone who gets that far in typing it after skipping a keystroke will either have found in the dropdown menu of suggestions or can find it near the top of the first page of search results. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 08:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Looks accidentally created. Gusfriend (talk) 02:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Elete. Nobody is going to type this. HotdogPi 16:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate at Paradise Mall. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) Слава Україні! 14:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Paradise mall → Heng Fa Chuen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Paradise Mall → Heng Fa Chuen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

Maybe disambiguate because of Paradise Center in Sofia and Surfer's Paradise. There are probably other malls called that too. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 18:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate at Paradise Mall (added to nomination). Move that lemma's edit history to Paradise Mall (Hong Kong) in case anyone ever wants to try writing an article for it again. Potential entries: Paradise Mall, Heng Fa Chuen, Hong Kong; Paradise Mall, Shivaji Place, West Delhi, India; Paradise Mall (film) [de], a 1999 German film; and "Paradise Mall", a 1975 episode of Police Woman. Put Paradise Centre, Sofia, Bulgaria; and Paradise Centre, Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia in the WP:DABSEEALSO section. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 21:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Drafted at Draft:Paradise Mall (disambiguation). 61.239.39.90 (talk) 00:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate: Create list of pages that are related to Paradise mall in some way like the Surfers Paradise Mall. Gusfriend (talk) 02:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 18:13, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Raj Kumar (processor) → Raj Kumar (professor)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This is borderline G6 as unambiguously created in error, but it's been around a few years so I thought better to take it here. Moved from "neurosurgeon" to "processor" 4:38, 29 January 2019. Moved from "processor" to "professor" 4:39, 29 January 2019. Clearly not a plausible disambiguator, as Mr. Kumar is not any of the things that might be referred to as a processor. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 17:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: a clear error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Seems like an accident and suitable for deletion. Gusfriend (talk) 02:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 16:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Philosophy and myth → Polytheistic myth as psychology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I'm not sure why this redirect has this target, but since I didn't believe it was R3-worthy, I thought it'd be best that we have a discussion. This may be a notable topic in the future suo jure or perhaps can be used to target a book, Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx, but since both do not exist I think it would be best to keep it as a redlink (by which I mean delete). Sdrqaz (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC); Clarification made 09:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No (sensible) target. @Sdrqaz: I assume you meant "delete"? To "keep as a redlink" makes no sense. Paradoctor (talk) 05:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  That's correct, yes. I meant it in the sense of making it a redlink (i.e. deleting it). I've inserted a clarification above. Sdrqaz (talk) 09:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Simon Hatt → The Suicide Squad (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete because (a) Simon Hatt is a wheelchair tennis player who is mentioned in several articles, but has no article himself, and (b) the redirect applies to Simon Hatt, a producer on the film The Suicide Squad, who has no article, and no links, and isn't even mentioned in the redirect target article The Suicide Squad (film). Colonies Chris (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete to allow uninhibited use of Search, which reveals 3 mentions (of the wheelchair tennis player). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Shades of gray. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Dark Grey → X11 color names  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The page should be redirected to gray. Q28 (talk) 05:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Generally supportive as an obvious change, though the redirect isn't protected and there's no history of discussion or edit warring, and this isn't the sort of change one would expect to generate much controversy, so I'm not entirely sure why you didn't just WP:BOLD it. Nonetheless, here it is listed now, and we should wait until the discussion is resolved before doing anything. --HarJIT (talk) 10:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Shades of gray, which includes several colors named or described as dark gray. - Eureka Lott 18:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, that's a better suggestion. --HarJIT (talk) 17:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget as per Eureka Lott. Makes perfect sense, unlike being thrown into X11. --R. S. Shaw (talk) 19:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Shades of gray Gusfriend (talk) 02:27, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Genio → Quidgest#Genio  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in article Muhandes (talk) 09:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow the March 6th log page to be closed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete to facilitate uninhibited Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.